CSF77
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2013
- Posts:
- 18,664
- Liked Posts:
- 2,845
- Location:
- San Diego
So isn't Liriano up for FA this year? He would be a pitcher I would look into this offseason.
I would almost argue against signing Milkey. 53 mil is a little rich and with more depth 1-2 years away it would be unwise.
I would keep Coghlan in as the lead off still. He gets on base. At least for next year until Alcantara adapts to the league 100%.
I was thinking:
Coghlan LF
Castro SS. (Pump up trade value with more ab's.)
Rizzo 1B
Soler RF
Olt 3B
Baez 2B (Maybe Valbuena here and Baez in AAA if needed.)
Alcantara CF
Castillo C
at least until Alcantara looks the lead off part. I'm expecting Bryant in Iowa until they get another year of control. If Olt is hitting he becomes good trade bait then.
I don't think you sign him. Also, Soler is a 2 hitter. Castro the 6, imho. I like Coghlan. I don't think there is any need to sign another bat with Bryant coming up very early next season. If Olt is getting better swings, keep and figure out who goes to LF.
Castro is not a placeholder and not getting traded imho.This off season there will be a few 3B on the market. It is a bad time to sell Olt. Now in June if he is producing and a team has a need sure.
I see Olt and Castro sold next year. Also I see Russell as a 2 hitter. Castro is a place holder but with more AB's and his .340 ish OBA he is an asset there.
I don't think you sign him. Also, Soler is a 2 hitter. Castro the 6, imho. I like Coghlan. I don't think there is any need to sign another bat with Bryant coming up very early next season. If Olt is getting better swings, keep and figure out who goes to LF.
Dont think Olt is in their long term plan, he most likely comes north to play 3B til bryant comes up.There most certainly is. You can't have mostly newbies in the line-up hoping they will figure it out. There is too much risk involved, and as we have seen already, players do not hit the ground running like you want them to.
You need to have a proven bat. Even if Bryant joins the team, what kind of struggles is he going to have? Too many question marks, not enough veteran presence IMO. Take some the heat off of the young kids and let them develop instead of thrusting the success of the team on their shoulders.
CF Alcantara/Coghlan
LF Cabrera
3B Bryant
1B Rizzo
RF Soler
SS Castro
2B Baez
C Castillo
Does that line-up not look a lot better than having Olt playing everyday which adds another strikeout machine into an already strikeout riddled team? You don't want to go through another year of trying to figure out what sticks and what doesn't do you? If he is good enough, let him battle it out for 3rd base, or be the power hitting bench player and spot starter that all teams need.
Cabrera averages about 65 strikeouts a year with a good average and OBP skill, and has the pop to have 15-20 HR's to boot. This is exactly what the Cubs need.
Olt is plan "D" for me. There are other scenarios that make the Cubs a better with a lot less risk involved, and I don't want to see another season tossed out of the window when seemingly a few things are looking very positive. They are a couple of players away from making some noise in the Central division, and lateral movements are not going to get them anywhere.
There is too much risk involved, and as we have seen already, players do not hit the ground running like you want them to.
The main thing for the Cubs to do this offseason is decide what position they want to play Bryant at. That will change the entire direction of the offseason. I would not mind having Valbuena or Olt, man 3B with Bryant in LF. I think this sets them up best long-term. They also need to figure out their plans for Castro. I would prefer that we held onto him but I'm not sure that will be the case.
So they are trying to win? Come on now. If they were willing to spend big on a champ then they would have made an investment.
That said the bats this off season are looking thin. Cab is looking at 53 mil and I doubt they will go there.
Ideal situation is if they trade with Philly with Jackson and Brown and hope he bounces back.
I see them investing into a arm and I believe they will try to trade for a needed bat. But they need a LH bat over a RH bat.
Dark horse would be Headley. GG 3B hoping he bounces back. Then push Bryant out to LF. That is a big reach but would be cost effective.
If they end up pulling that trade and bring in Brown for LF and then send Jackson and cash over to Philly. Then they sign Lester this off season would be a success.
Why all of the dark horses? You still have to pay Headly, and I don't want another "WHAT IF" or a "HOPE TO". Get the proven bat that you need, and paying Cabrera 52 million for 4 years isn't breaking any bank versusu what someone like Elsbury received.
He is a table setter, left handed (primarily) which would allow blockage for Alcantara at 1st base to swipe bags, or a batter simply to pull the ball and advance him at worst if Alcantara doubles. He doesn't strikeout much , and knows how to work the count. He would be instrumental in helping in the developmental process for the young kids along with Rizzo.
Do we really need another full year of getting one pitcher and letting the kids HOPEFULLY mature? You can do that and have Valbuena, Olt, and Coghlan on the bench just in case it doesn't go as planned. That is how teams win. They don't win resting on their laurels.
And for what it's worth, figure up what a TOR pitcher and Cabrera would add to the payroll considering Cabrera would be 5-6 million less per year than Soriano. I think the Cubs can more than afford both with the payroll flexibility that they will now have.