brett05
867-5309
- Joined:
- Apr 28, 2009
- Posts:
- 27,226
- Liked Posts:
- 4,579
- Location:
- Hell
Longevity is an elite standard to me. Guys that stink don't play long
Lee Smith has no business in the hall of fame, IMO.
The Hall has become, for many, a reward for staying healthy and accumulating stats.
He was a good closer who pitched a long time. But at no time was he a shut down closer who you knew would get the save. He was durable, and accumulated a lot of saves. But he was nowhere near the caliber of the closers in the HOF.
Longevity is an elite standard to me. Guys that stink don't play long
The announcement of immortality will come for some later this afternoon at 2PM. If your vote counted, who would you be inducting today for the Hall?
My ballot:
Randy Johnson
Pedro Martinez
Craig Biggio
John Smoltz
Tim Raines
Jeff Bagwell
Mike Piazza
Roger Clemens
Barry Bonds
Curt Schilling
Guys who I left off but feel are deserving of strong consideration. Again, the ballot limit is 10 inductees.
Gary Sheffield
Mike Mussina
Edgar Martinez
Jeff Kent
There are hundreds of players who played 15+ years that aren't in the HOF.
Yes, you have to be major league quality for a long time in order to stick. That doesn't mean HOF quality.
You cringe at a guy getting into the Hall with over 3000 hits and you don't understand the difference between Kent and Biggio? Kent is Hall of Very Good.Watching baseball guys discuss the HOF, it seems to me there are so many who want every player to get in. But I admit this year's ballot had a lot of guys who should at least get serious consideration.
Congrats to the 4 who were elected. (I cringe at Biggio as HOF'er, but will relent)
It is odd how some guys are almost slam dunks and other, very comparable players barely get any consideration. Biggio just missed 1st ballot election, and got in easily this year, yet Jeff Kent never gets close and Kent was every bit as good as Biggio.
There are hundreds of players who played 15+ years that aren't in the HOF.
Yes, you have to be major league quality for a long time in order to stick. That doesn't mean HOF quality.
You cringe at a guy getting into the Hall with over 3000 hits and you don't understand the difference between Kent and Biggio? Kent is Hall of Very Good.
With Santo In Dick Allen should be in. Contemporary who is better
You cringe at a guy getting into the Hall with over 3000 hits and you don't understand the difference between Kent and Biggio? Kent is Hall of Very Good.
Biggio is in because he's more "famous."
Btw, I just looked it up and Biggio only hit .300 four times.
No, but that is the first mark that separates the wheat from the chaff.
The increase in power couldn't have anything to do with playing in a pitchers park at home and then moving into a hitter friendly park with closer fences later in his career? Tony Gwynn got a bit of a power surge toward the end of his career for a couple of seasons and much of it he credited to a conversation he had with Ted Williams in the off-season. We should just assume it was roids, right?Biggio also displayed little power over his first ten years, then suddenly, at age 35, started hitting HR's in the middle of the steroid era.
Biggio also displayed little power over his first ten years, then suddenly, at age 35, started hitting HR's in the middle of the steroid era.
Wasn't Jeff Bagwell a roid guy? Or am I confusing him with Buff Bagwell?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The increase in power couldn't have anything to do with playing in a pitchers park at home and then moving into a hitter friendly park with closer fences later in his career? Tony Gwynn got a bit of a power surge toward the end of his career for a couple of seasons and much of it he credited to a conversation he had with Ted Williams in the off-season. We should just assume it was roids, right?
That's BuffWasn't Jeff Bagwell a roid guy? Or am I confusing him with Buff Bagwell?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bryant got snubbed
Sent from My 1998 Palm Pilot Using Tapatalk