2021-2022 IGT Masterthread

RamiTheBullsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
9,505
Liked Posts:
1,733
Except the numbers say Lonzo is also a better 3 point shooter and has a higher true shooting % than Lamelo.

Add that to being a better defender and just as good of a passer, and it’s fair to say Lamelo and Lonzo are pretty equal in terms of overall value. Again, the roles an individual roster needs plays into the preference of which you’d want IMO
True shooting percentage isn't exactly a great stat to measure valuability when it comes to scoring. Lonzo takes a lot of spot-up three-point shots. Lamelo draws a lot more attention from the defense. Unlike his brother, he can make a contested lay up. And create his shot off the dribble. I think that he's a better passer than his brother as well. And rebounder.
 

RamiTheBullsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
9,505
Liked Posts:
1,733
I think I tend to agree with Rami on this argument for the most part.

But, we can all certainly agree to disagree on it. It's a bit subjective.
It's always subjective when you're trying to weigh a player's value to a specific team and hypothesize on how that same player would do in a different role. And try to rank them based on that. Lonzo Ball has been a very valuable player for the Bulls this season. And Caruso has too. Never been more happy about the NBA tampering rules being broken in my life.
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,601
Liked Posts:
7,413
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Brogdon is a really good player, but is he having a better season than ball? Not really. He’s shooting about 28% from 3 on almost 6 attempts per game. Taking that many and missing on that many isn’t helping your team win games. He does do some other things well, I’ll grant you that…but he’s not the defender Lonzo is either.

And the record has little to do with it
So if Brogdon "regresses to the mean" as they say and shoots 38% from 3, which is his career percentage, instead of 28%, would you then say that he is helping his team win games? At a glance he's otherwise pretty similar to Trae Young in that he's scoring at a pretty high rate, assisting at a pretty high rate, at shooting (overall) at a pretty respectable rate (46.5% FG%). And yes he's not as good as Lonzo defensively, but he's a better defender than Trae Young I'd say. But you have Young in the "at least as good as Lonzo" category but not Brogdon, so I'm a little confused where the cutoff is.

And just for kicks, Hawks and Pacers have the same record so record indeed should have little to do with it.
 

knoxville7

I have the stride of a gazelle
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Jul 12, 2013
Posts:
20,219
Liked Posts:
14,141
Location:
The sewers
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Tennessee Volunteers
So if Brogdon "regresses to the mean" as they say and shoots 38% from 3, which is his career percentage, instead of 28%, would you then say that he is helping his team win games? At a glance he's otherwise pretty similar to Trae Young in that he's scoring at a pretty high rate, assisting at a pretty high rate, at shooting (overall) at a pretty respectable rate (46.5% FG%). And yes he's not as good as Lonzo defensively, but he's a better defender than Trae Young I'd say. But you have Young in the "at least as good as Lonzo" category but not Brogdon, so I'm a little confused where the cutoff is.

And just for kicks, Hawks and Pacers have the same record so record indeed should have little to do with it.
If he starts shooting 38% from 3 again and continues to play well in the other areas like he has been, I have no qualms with putting him in or above Lonzos category

Again, my stipulation was THIS season only. The fact he’s a career good 3 point shooter doesn’t matter. I think people are thinking a bit too much about players past performances when thinking about this, as to be expected…it’s hard for people to separate it. Not saying you are, but there’s others commenting as well
 

Scoot26

Administrator
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
41,333
Liked Posts:
28,433
Lonzo is good that's all that matters yo.
giphy.gif
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,601
Liked Posts:
7,413
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
If he starts shooting 38% from 3 again and continues to play well in the other areas like he has been, I have no qualms with putting him in or above Lonzos category

Again, my stipulation was THIS season only. The fact he’s a career good 3 point shooter doesn’t matter. I think people are thinking a bit too much about players past performances when thinking about this, as to be expected…it’s hard for people to separate it. Not saying you are, but there’s others commenting as well
Yeah I'm just saying that as an example that Brogdon is not a bad shooter at all, as his first 10 game numbers might suggest. Indeed a few players did have rough starts to the season shooting the ball including Luka and Steph in their first few games. Brogdon has been out a few games already as well (which if anything I would say that is the reason he would not be helping his team win vs taking 6 3s a game). Other names like Donovan Mitchell and Duncan Robinson had slow starts to the year shooting the ball, as well as the aforementioned Damian Lillard.

But considering the holistic view of the player, I am willing to give Brogdon some slack on the 3pt shooting with knowledge that he is likely to improve and has still been contributing in other ways. Much in the same way that I do not fault Lonzo for shooting what is likely a bad percentage from midrange because he too contributes in other ways. Mind you while Lonzo is shooting a very admirable 44% from 3 he is shooting closer to 41% overall on FGs which means his 2pt% is probably as bad as Brogdon's 3pt to start the season. Stuff like that is what makes it hard for me to consider Lonzo definitively better through this early part of the season.
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,601
Liked Posts:
7,413
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
I should also like to say I am glad that we are even breathing Lonzo's name in these conversations because he has been playing pretty well and so has the team. Haven't had this much excitement in a decade it seems like
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,841
Liked Posts:
2,548
Ended up missing the last half of 3rd Q and 4th Q.. but doesn't seem I missed much as far as the game as it didn't exactly get closer after that.

Great game by the trio. Bench besides DJ Jr was garbage. Coby White definitely gonna take a lot of time to get up to speed.
Did you miss the Anthony Davis ejection, man that kid should have had a career night and they frustrated him all game.
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,841
Liked Posts:
2,548
I should also like to say I am glad that we are even breathing Lonzo's name in these conversations because he has been playing pretty well and so has the team. Haven't had this much excitement in a decade it seems like
He may not be better statistically than a lot of PGs on the list, but he is a better passer than some, he's better defender than some, has better size than some, better IQ than some, and it works the other way. But he's much better on THIS team than many of those names better than him. On this team as it's setup, it works. Looking down through the list of PG better than him, it's true, but I think the bigger argument is how many of those are better on THIS team. He's the perfect plug in combination of skill that they need. High IQ, good size to guard, excellent hands to defend, much improved shooting to create that triple threat, really skilled passer to hit the two main scorers. It doesn't matter if he's top 10 in the league, I think he's top 10 fit on this team probably, at least for the money. Which I know is still substantial.

On a side note, and i don't want to distract anything here. I hope the plan here in bringing in DeMarvelous is to groom Patrick Williams in his image. I know he's not anywhere near there, but he is still so young it would be great if he could figure out that role as DD gets older. He's got two more years at least to see how the master does it.
 

Axl Rose

and I knew the silence of the world
Joined:
Oct 11, 2011
Posts:
12,243
Liked Posts:
4,403
Did you miss the Anthony Davis ejection, man that kid should have had a career night and they frustrated him all game.

That was a BS ejection really. Ref must have figured the game was over anyway.
 

clonetrooper264

Retired Bandwagon Mod
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 11, 2009
Posts:
23,601
Liked Posts:
7,413
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  2. Golden State Warriors
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
He may not be better statistically than a lot of PGs on the list, but he is a better passer than some, he's better defender than some, has better size than some, better IQ than some, and it works the other way. But he's much better on THIS team than many of those names better than him. On this team as it's setup, it works. Looking down through the list of PG better than him, it's true, but I think the bigger argument is how many of those are better on THIS team. He's the perfect plug in combination of skill that they need. High IQ, good size to guard, excellent hands to defend, much improved shooting to create that triple threat, really skilled passer to hit the two main scorers. It doesn't matter if he's top 10 in the league, I think he's top 10 fit on this team probably, at least for the money. Which I know is still substantial.

On a side note, and i don't want to distract anything here. I hope the plan here in bringing in DeMarvelous is to groom Patrick Williams in his image. I know he's not anywhere near there, but he is still so young it would be great if he could figure out that role as DD gets older. He's got two more years at least to see how the master does it.
I agree. I didn't think it when we acquired him, but Lonzo was indeed the PG we needed for this team and he is excelling in his role. I credit the FO and BD for putting him where he shines.

If DeMar can teach PWill anything about how to score that would be so amazing. Dude has to be willing to actually shoot first though lol.
 

Raskolnikov

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
22,524
Liked Posts:
7,552
Location:
Enemy Territory via southern C
Lonzo just sealed this one up. He’s been dominant tonight

not sure who the 10 point guards are that are better than him right now
Yeah, I came here to say he came with an ice pick to this one.

It was a revenge game and was icey hot start to finish. Poker face.

His passes zip. Definitely some special qualities as a passer.

Get these guys a wicked 3 and D stretch 4. **** I think Mirotic would have been perfect for this team.
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,288
Liked Posts:
10,091
Yeah, I came here to say he came with an ice pick to this one.

It was a revenge game and was icey hot start to finish. Poker face.

His passes zip. Definitely some special qualities as a passer.

Get these guys a wicked 3 and D stretch 4. **** I think Mirotic would have been perfect for this team.
Harrison Barnes, OG Anunoby, Miles Bridges, Jerami Grant would all be perfect.

I think Barnes and Grant can be had. Harrison would fit like a goddamn glove though. If the bulls wanted to push all their chips in this year and make a run of it…Williams/Coby/TBJ can probably get it done
 
Last edited:

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,841
Liked Posts:
2,548
That was a BS ejection really. Ref must have figured the game was over anyway.
I don't disagree. But that was an accumulation ejection. He was a little ***** all night cause he wasn't getting the embid treatment
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,841
Liked Posts:
2,548
I agree. I didn't think it when we acquired him, but Lonzo was indeed the PG we needed for this team and he is excelling in his role. I credit the FO and BD for putting him where he shines.

If DeMar can teach PWill anything about how to score that would be so amazing. Dude has to be willing to actually shoot first though lol.
I think that's exactly it. He's so young and is dripping with potential but nooooo confidence or aggression. Has always been asked to defer and never be the guy. I'm praying DD has 2 more years to transform it.
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,288
Liked Posts:
10,091
I think that's exactly it. He's so young and is dripping with potential but nooooo confidence or aggression. Has always been asked to defer and never be the guy. I'm praying DD has 2 more years to transform it.
Lack of aggression on offense is only part of it. That can be fixed. My bigger concern is his overall listless demeanor on the court and lack of testicular fortitude. Similar to Markkanenn in that regard. He’s still young so he could find himself, but that’s my biggest concern. That can’t really be taught or coached.
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,841
Liked Posts:
2,548
Lack of aggression on offense is only part of it. That can be fixed. My bigger concern is his overall listless demeanor on the court and lack of testicular fortitude. Similar to Markkanenn in that regard. He’s still young so he could find himself, but that’s my biggest concern. That can’t really be taught or coached.
I think you are confusing quiet or reserved with lack of testicular fortitude. He doesn't have a big personality but I've seen him absolutely throw down on people at times last year. Enough that I hated the pick but I came around a bit. I've seen enough moments of aggressiveness to feel confident he has it, Laurie I thought just sucked more than he thought he did and it ruined him. Plus he had no coach who could develop talent.
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,288
Liked Posts:
10,091
I think you are confusing quiet or reserved with lack of testicular fortitude. He doesn't have a big personality but I've seen him absolutely throw down on people at times last year. Enough that I hated the pick but I came around a bit. I've seen enough moments of aggressiveness to feel confident he has it, Laurie I thought just sucked more than he thought he did and it ruined him. Plus he had no coach who could develop talent.
Not confusing anything. He is overall very timid and somewhat mentally absent far too often. There will be occasional plays of aggression, but they’re few and far between. He does not play with energy, aggression, or toughness. There’s a lack of grit without question. Not saying he’s a lost cause or can’t improve, but have to call it how I see it
 

RacerX

Silicon Valley CA Bears H
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
10,029
Liked Posts:
8,601
Location:
Silicon Valley, CA
Lack of aggression on offense is only part of it. That can be fixed. My bigger concern is his overall listless demeanor on the court and lack of testicular fortitude. Similar to Markkanenn in that regard. He’s still young so he could find himself, but that’s my biggest concern. That can’t really be taught or coached.
I recognize his potential like everyone else, and yet I would ship his ass out right-fast. I don’t see his potential ever intersecting with production, he reminds me of me playing pickup hoops each Saturday morning, i.e., the energy and drive of a Boomer.
 

Top