- Joined:
- Aug 29, 2012
- Posts:
- 23,269
- Liked Posts:
- 27,060
If they've got to deal him, there's not really a better time than now. They could take that deal from San Francisco and then take Pitts/Chase at #3, which would be pretty funny cause they've seemingly refused to draft pass catchers for Rodgers.Aaron Rodgers does not want to play for the Packers, just reported by Schefter on ESPN. Rodgers is not budging.
That would be funny. He is gone. Looks like Rodgers is set on not playing for the Packers no matter what.If they've got to deal him, there's not really a better time than now. They could take that deal from San Francisco and then take Pitts/Chase at #3, which would be pretty funny cause they've seemingly refused to draft pass catchers for Rodgers.
Trading a hof qb to draft a te wouldn’t give me good feels if I was a pack fan. I guess you have to get pass the idea they already drafted their new franchise qb last year. But man Rodgers for a te lolIf they've got to deal him, there's not really a better time than now. They could take that deal from San Francisco and then take Pitts/Chase at #3, which would be pretty funny cause they've seemingly refused to draft pass catchers for Rodgers.
Well yea but ideally you'd never be in position to have to make that trade. If Rodgers is going to force their hand then you might as well make the most of a bad situation. Pitts is a unique talent and they'd get more than just that one pick.Trading a hof qb to draft a te wouldn’t give me good feels if I was a pack fan. I guess you have to get pass the idea they already drafted their new franchise qb last year. But man Rodgers for a te lol
Would they be bold enough and say f love we like the qb options at 3 pick overall better like cardinals did a few years ago when they selected Murray?Well yea but ideally you'd never be in position to have to make that trade. If Rodgers is going to force their hand then you might as well make the most of a bad situation. Pitts is a unique talent and they'd get more than just that one pick.
Who are you liking there? You're picking from Fields, Lance and Jones... all of which would probably be about on equal footing with Jordan Love who has a year learning behind a HOF'er under his belt. If you're trading away Rodgers then I would think you'd want to set your new QB up to succeed as best possible, and drafting an elite pass catcher sure helps there. They're already returning their good ground game led by Aaron Jones and they'd still have their first rounder.Would they be bold enough and say f love we like the qb options at 3 pick overall better like cardinals did a few years ago when they selected Murray?
looks like itSo Lynch was Patriot-fleeced?
do they even have next years first?Who are you liking there? You're picking from Fields, Lance and Jones... all of which would probably be about on equal footing with Jordan Love who has a year learning behind a HOF'er under his belt. If you're trading away Rodgers then I would think you'd want to set your new QB up to succeed as best possible, and drafting an elite pass catcher sure helps there. They're already returning their good ground game led by Aaron Jones and they'd still have their first rounder.
San Fran would give up the farm for him which would include at least next year's first as well.
get it done pace
Yuck. I’d rather root for the Packers than see Rodgers in a Bears uniform...and I’ll NEVER root for the Packers!get it done pace
Good point. They probably traded it to move up to #3?do they even have next years first?
Yuck. I’d rather root for the Packers than see Rodgers in a Bears uniform...and I’ll NEVER root for the Packers!