LordKOTL
Scratched for Vorobiev
- Joined:
- Dec 8, 2014
- Posts:
- 8,671
- Liked Posts:
- 3,041
- Location:
- PacNW
My favorite teams
[quote name="PatrickSharpRules"]
[quote name="IceHogsFan"]If I am not mistaken owning a handgun in the city limits is illegal but not a shotgun
or rifle if appropriately registered. Is that true? If so, it is the reason why it is a big
deal and also the reason why the ban in Chicago is going before the Supreme Court.
This has incredible timing.[/quote]
I still think this guys handgun was completely legal under the grandfather clause, my dads friend has his gun/guns legally under the same one.
And I still don't see the need for handguns, sure the handgun helped this guy and his wife, but a shotgun would have done the job, and it would have been a way better headline. "80 year old Vet blows off intruders head to save wife".....assuming the press would embellish the story.[/quote]
Forgive my contrary nature, but I don't see the reason to NOT have them.
Yes, the main beef is that they can be concealed, but if you think about it--a rifle or a shotgun can be long, and in an englosed space, like a hallway, it can be difficult to manoeuver (why do you think Samurai/Ninjas carried around Tanto as well as Katana/Wakazashi?).
My belief is that the citizenry should be able to keep the same or better weaponry than the government--after all, it's not like criminals won't and you can't always trust the government to bail your ass out when needed
[quote name="IceHogsFan"]If I am not mistaken owning a handgun in the city limits is illegal but not a shotgun
or rifle if appropriately registered. Is that true? If so, it is the reason why it is a big
deal and also the reason why the ban in Chicago is going before the Supreme Court.
This has incredible timing.[/quote]
I still think this guys handgun was completely legal under the grandfather clause, my dads friend has his gun/guns legally under the same one.
And I still don't see the need for handguns, sure the handgun helped this guy and his wife, but a shotgun would have done the job, and it would have been a way better headline. "80 year old Vet blows off intruders head to save wife".....assuming the press would embellish the story.[/quote]
Forgive my contrary nature, but I don't see the reason to NOT have them.
Yes, the main beef is that they can be concealed, but if you think about it--a rifle or a shotgun can be long, and in an englosed space, like a hallway, it can be difficult to manoeuver (why do you think Samurai/Ninjas carried around Tanto as well as Katana/Wakazashi?).
My belief is that the citizenry should be able to keep the same or better weaponry than the government--after all, it's not like criminals won't and you can't always trust the government to bail your ass out when needed