[A] Blackhawks (12-4-3) vs Flames (7-9-1) - 11/18 - 8:00 PM

[dlrob315]

Leg two of the circus trip and the Hawks will be looking to extend their longest winning streak of the season. Hawks will take on the struggling Flames after coming off an impressive win over the Canucks Wednesday night.

[1] Blackhawks (12-4-3) 27 pts @ [15] Flames (7-9-1) 15 pts



Last 10: Chicago 7-2-1, Calgary 5-5-0



Friday - 11.18.2011 - 8:00 PM



Live On: CSN (HD) - Radio: WGN 720​

Click here to view the article

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

Nice graphic!!!!



hawks 3-1

 

[howcho]

Hawks win win this one again. Looking forward to seeing Sutter's contorted face as we pants his defence.



Power play will continue to improve. That is all

 

[roshinaya]

You got outdated stats in your fancy pic.



Just win. Keep it simple and play their own game and they should do well. The first PP unit ought to get some more results.

 

[the canadian dream]

I need bit points again from Leddy, Keith, Kane and Craw (if he sees action this game).



I ma 10 points behind my fantasy opponent this week so I need some healthy numbers in this game.





Oh yah this is about the Hawks not me......Flames suck...should be able to beat them if the lines stay as is. That's pretty much it.

 

[dlrob315]

You got outdated stats in your fancy pic.



Just win. Keep it simple and play their own game and they should do well. The first PP unit ought to get some more results.

What graphics are outdated? I have two graphics put up. Let me know so I can fix.



edit: found and fixed.

 

[Tater]

Hawks win win this one again. Looking forward to seeing Sutter's contorted face as we pants his defence.



Power play will continue to improve. That is all

LMAO

 

[CLWolf81]

Where the hell are the clowns damnit? I miss those stupid ugly clowns to show we're on the Circus Trip, LOL



Anyways, I've been watching the Flamers all year... They don't look too hot, and their fans look like a hot mess. Bourque looks decent at least, but beyond that, they can be beaten.



My only worry is getting Karlsson in net for the Flamers. He's actually pretty decent back there for a backup. But, because we're one of the top teams so far in the standings, I see us getting the honor of Kipper's presence tonight... I can see him getting peppered with shots, some of which will go in. Yeah we've been getting some garbage goals too, lately, so let the fun continue!

I see us going 2-0 on this trip with a 4-1 Hawks win. I can see Monty getting one for the hell of it, and Stalberg gets one to spite us, LOL

 

[tvltre]

Garbage goals? Nope...don't agree. Bounces are going the Hawks way again and hopefully that continues.



The D needs to stop letting some many goals against. The Hawks are 11th in the conference in GA with 53. need to step up a bit in their zone.



Offense should be the same and PP hopefully continues to improve. Hawks win 6-2

 

[LordKOTL]

Only way I see us losing this is if we mail it in or take the Flames too lightly.

 

[Ton]

Frolik out, Smith in

 

[howcho]

Happy to see Smith up for a game, sorry to see it is at the expense of Frolik's injury.

 

[Rex]

I'd still like to see Bolland on the third line, and Bickell in the pressbox. Kruger has earned the minutes though, so it's hard to complain.

 

[Ton]

Leddy will also be paired with Keith, Montador with Hammer, Lepisto and Scott.

 

[Rex]

why change the D lines? they have been working!

 

[Ton]

why change the D lines? they have been working!

I don't get it either.

 

[PatrickSharpRules]

Will miss this game cause I'm going to see Furthur at Allstate but I miss it with a lot of confidence that we win pretty easy. The Flames are just wasting away this seasons it seems, that and even when we really sucked we still be the good Flames teams.



Still a good sign to see Seabrook traveling with the team and not being placed on IR.

 

[Ashor-redtribe]

hopefully we can put the flames out tonight before I go to bed.

 

[the canadian dream]

BEN SMITH!!!!!

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

BEN SMITH!!!!!

I refuse to acknowledge that I know what you're talking about.