[A] Blackhawks (29-18-7) @ Sharks (29-16-6) - 02/10 - 9:30 PM

PatrickSharpRules

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
1,986
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Southside, Chicago
We lose. We wont win until we play columbus, so expect another week worth of Shithawks. Fire Q!

You still would have to show me a video of you celebrating the cup for me not to believe that you weren't pissed that is wasn't in 5 games.
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
so wait, not Morrison is a winger?? What the **** is Q doing with that third line??



and Why isn't Stalberg on the first line with Toews and Kane, like he was when they were winning games, where he has CHEMISTRY!



the guy has been good in 2012, and he gets paid back by putting him on the third line??



Morrison-Kruger-Stalberg



jesus fucking christ



oh, and the D looks Special person. gotta love that the entire second D pairing are rookies.



Lepisto-O'Donnell looks fucking dumb too. God I wish I wasn't going to watch this shit.
 

CLWolf81

Fan Captain
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,107
Liked Posts:
96
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
..........



Even now I'm on the "Fire Q" bandwagon now. Giving up 2 PP goals in the first period alone????



God......
 

Chief Walking Stick

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
47,956
Liked Posts:
26,435
**** this fucking game.... hope they get fucking blown out and continue to get blown out til the fucktard coach is out of town.



Fucking embarrassment take your stupid fucking shit gimmick mustache and RIDE IT OUT OF TOWN.
 

CLWolf81

Fan Captain
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,107
Liked Posts:
96
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
3 PP so far. ZERO shots on goal!!!!!



I think I'm gonna hurl.



It's quite obvious. This team isn't responding to Q anymore.... I certainly wouldn't with these musical lines and crap.... Its rather noticeable now, too.



Bye Q! Thanks for 2010!!!
 

DBQHawkFan

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
210
Liked Posts:
0
My Squirt team could get a f'n shot on goal in 3 PP. Whatever you are doing is not working.
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
The awesome Kitchen "Triangle + 1" strikes again. 2/3 baby!



**** this coaching staff.
 

the canadian dream

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
6,402
Liked Posts:
14
Nice 1st period hawks. Great way to start a game.



You guys let me know how those 2 pk goals by the sharks were qs fault. Would love to hear that spin.



While you are at it let me know how q is responsible for krugers inability to shoot away from the goalie and Keiths inability to hit the net. Also how he is responsible for Crawford coming off his post so slow and sloppy passing.



Im not seeing much q responsibility so far. What Im seeing is a lazy penalty to start the game...a mind fart by hossa (who has been horrible this trip) and some very sloppy puck decisions and bad shooting. Sorry period one is all on the guys on the ice.



Nice try though guys. This q shit has really become the only scapegoat goat now. Its becoming old and its keeping you all from seeing other issues.



I want q gone also but come on now.



Ps Eddie is Fucking dumb as nails.
 

the canadian dream

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
6,402
Liked Posts:
14
Better start to the second. Showing some desperation is always good.



Big points for kruger this period. Getting into the dirty. Love that.



Bickells still useless
 

CLWolf81

Fan Captain
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,107
Liked Posts:
96
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
Hmmmm.... 2-2..... Thats a way to shut us all up.
 

CLWolf81

Fan Captain
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,107
Liked Posts:
96
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
Nice turnover....had to be the Snail Line, didn't it? -.-
 

PatrickShart

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
4,782
Liked Posts:
452
Crawford is pathetic/slow as a snail.



Wait....I mean Waite isn't teaching him, and Q sucks for putting him in net, and Kitchen too.
 

PatrickShart

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
4,782
Liked Posts:
452
Anytime Frolik wants to skate in between the dots anywhere on the ice, is fine by me.



That guy is scared to skate ANYWHERE near the net or contact.
 

CLWolf81

Fan Captain
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,107
Liked Posts:
96
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
I dont blame Dylan at all for the reaction time on that.... That was all Craw and that turnover with that line.
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
Nice 1st period hawks. Great way to start a game.



You guys let me know how those 2 pk goals by the sharks were qs fault. Would love to hear that spin.



While you are at it let me know how q is responsible for krugers inability to shoot away from the goalie and Keiths inability to hit the net. Also how he is responsible for Crawford coming off his post so slow and sloppy passing.



Im not seeing much q responsibility so far. What Im seeing is a lazy penalty to start the game...a mind fart by hossa (who has been horrible this trip) and some very sloppy puck decisions and bad shooting. Sorry period one is all on the guys on the ice.



Nice try though guys. This q shit has really become the only scapegoat goat now. Its becoming old and its keeping you all from seeing other issues.



I want q gone also but come on now.



Ps Eddie is Fucking dumb as nails.



I'm sorry, but did you somehow miss the triangle + 1 PK at work in the first period? Also, you must have witnessed three Hawk PPs with zero shots on goal? How does the coaching staff not get blamed for the special teams?
 

PatrickShart

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
4,782
Liked Posts:
452
Pez...I don't like that set up either



However...how slow was Crawford going post to post? Why in gods name did he look over his left shoulder at the puck carrier behind the net - pulling himself further out? The Hawks had 3 guys down low as they should...but Crawford gave a 4x6



I thought the PP rotations and puck movement has looked good tonite...at least better. Need results though.



Personally...I knew once the Hawks tied it....one scoring chance was going in vs Crawford.
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
Pez...I don't like that set up either



However...how slow was Crawford going post to post? Why in gods name did he look over his left shoulder at the puck carrier behind the net - pulling himself further out? The Hawks had 3 guys down low as they should...but Crawford gave a 4x6



I thought the PP rotations and puck movement has looked good tonite...at least better. Need results though.



Personally...I knew once the Hawks tied it....one scoring chance was going in vs Crawford.



Crawford still sucks. No argument there. But that PK setup is just so idiotic.
 

PatrickShart

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
4,782
Liked Posts:
452
I'm definitely not a fan - but the players were at least in position to make plays - they need to start making them/have some sort of accountability



This period...watch Frolik - he will never ever skate in the dots anywhere on the ice. It's like he treats it like the 3 second rule in basketball,lol



If he ever went near the net - he'd make an impact. This idea that he hustles or has an effect on the game, is complete bullshit. He does absolutely nothing productive out there (not that you support him either...it just baffles me watching him do absolutely nothing when on the ice)



He has 1 goal in the last 36 games. (Ok..2 - but one was an empty netter)
 

Top