[A] Brink of Elimination: CHI 2, PHX 3 (OT)

PatrickShart

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
4,782
Liked Posts:
452
Leddy recovered (catching a pretty quick Boedker) and didn't even allow a shot on that breakaway.



Kane had 2pts in gm 1 (setting up the tying goal) 7 SOG



GM2..set up the tying goal to send it to OT (again)



Gm 3...yes, had an assist on a deflection, but I think that still counts as creating offense?



So he had 4pts on the teams first 7 goals...but a non factor?
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
Leddy recovered (catching a pretty quick Boedker) and didn't even allow a shot on that breakaway.



Kane had 2pts in gm 1 (setting up the tying goal) 7 SOG



GM2..set up the tying goal to send it to OT (again)



Gm 3...yes, had an assist on a deflection, but I think that still counts as creating offense?



So he had 4pts on the teams first 7 goals...but a non factor?



Hey you know you cant use facts when arguing about Kane, you have to just make shit up
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,852
Liked Posts:
2,553
2 things then i'm done and moving on.



1.) I fucking hate Q right now. It's one thing to juggle lines constantly in a game to make adjustments. Fine I can deal with that, but to continue to juggle the lineup with bonehead moves that a 10 year old can see... what the ****. OD, Morrison, and Brunette all in the lineup at the same time? NO MAYERS? I hope to god their was a reason and he wasn't a health scratch. Talk about fucking handicapping your team off the top. Those three shouldn't see the ice in the playoffs, I don't care if Morrison happen to get a lucky break.



2.) I never like to blame the refs for much considering it's a 60 minutes game that is usually filled with ample opportunity for making up for any poor reffing. I can understand a bad call... or even two. And in the playoffs with everything turned up a notch, maybe three, in a SINGLE game. But I have never seen such a gross incompetence of reffing throughout an entire series. It's not even 1 bad one a game, it's 3+ per game like clockwork. And it only fuels the conspiracy theories as they have completely take over control of the game. It would be one thing for them to miss stuff going both ways which shows they are just a bad crew, but they miss 3x more calls on Phoenix than they do on Chicago. The problem is you can't complain about it without being brushed off as a homer fanboy. It's impossible short of video showing each and every penalty on both teams that was and wasn't called. And then even when something is called somehow the hawks get the short end. IE Toews in the box to start a period when multiple infractions could have easily been called.



I'm done. Go Hawks, it ain't over, you've done it before, Win in 7.
 

R K

Guest
Tell me, again, Ron, how great Kane is....umm....let's see....ummm....two SOG, with the last one in the second period.



Now, don't get me wrong, there's plenty of blame to spread around -- Crawford, Sharp, Toews, Keith, Oduya, O'Donnell, Leddy -- the list goes on. But for you jackwads to keep insisting how great Kane has been is ridiculous. He has completely disappeared in this series. And, NO, he didn't score that goal in the third game. He fired it, but it was deflected. Yeah, call me a Kane-hater, but I'm just a realist. I'm not defending their other stars because they're just as much to blame for this imminent elimination from the playoffs.



you just call me a jack wad you **** sucker?



Kane has not disappeared you idiot. He leads the fucking team in points. Again he can not do it on his own. Disappeared, yea.
 

R K

Guest
Leddy recovered (catching a pretty quick Boedker) and didn't even allow a shot on that breakaway.



Kane had 2pts in gm 1 (setting up the tying goal) 7 SOG



GM2..set up the tying goal to send it to OT (again)



Gm 3...yes, had an assist on a deflection, but I think that still counts as creating offense?



So he had 4pts on the teams first 7 goals...but a non factor?



Disappeared she says!
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
I still cannot believe Crawford let in that goal. It was actually worse than the game three goal, seeing as the guy never even took a shot. If you don't think shit goals like that affect the team's play, you're insane. I would be angry if our beer league goalie let that shit in. To have that happen to your team two games in a row? Hawks have to be demoralized. To think both goalies are coming back next season makes me sick.



Oh, and maybe the big guns for the Hawks could get going if the lineup made sense. How were Toews, Sharp, Stalberg, or Kane supposed to produce last night when every other shift they are on the ice with Morrison or Brunette or OD? Wow.
 

R K

Guest





I talked to most of them last night after the game. Cowards and Guttless would be two words I wouldn't use. Then again they'd embarass anyone on this board on thier worst day on the ice. Every ONE of them.



Oduya's game sure has changed in the past three games though, but the Coyote forcheck is amazing at times.
 

supraman

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
8,024
Liked Posts:
196
Location:
St.Pete, FL
I love Panger last night praising the Coyotes for drafting Turris. No where did I read they FUCKED HIM UP in the process!



**** the Yotes classless hacks
 

Tim

New member
Joined:
May 22, 2010
Posts:
197
Liked Posts:
0
I'm still trying to figure out what a Jack wad is..... I know what a jako beast is...

1. JACK WAD

A person containing the attributes of both a "Jack ass" and a "Dick wad". Having a inept attitude or ignorance.

Larry is such a JACK WAD for stealing my car.

2. Jack Wad

The term Jack Wad is used to describe an uneducated, moronic, Special person, with absolutaly no regard for any onther person. This term is mostly used to describe a law breaker or other low life drain on society.
 

howcho

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
774
Liked Posts:
40
Location:
Abbotsford, British Columbia
I was pissed with the non-call on the high sticking against Sharp while we were on the PP. It should have been a double minor giving us apporx 1.5minutes of 5-3 and another 5-4 after that. The non-call on the Bickle trip was brutal as well.
 

howcho

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
774
Liked Posts:
40
Location:
Abbotsford, British Columbia
Oh and Crawford Sucks
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
I still cannot believe Crawford let in that goal. It was actually worse than the game three goal, seeing as the guy never even took a shot. If you don't think shit goals like that affect the team's play, you're insane. I would be angry if our beer league goalie let that shit in. To have that happen to your team two games in a row? Hawks have to be demoralized. To think both goalies are coming back next season makes me sick.



Oh, and maybe the big guns for the Hawks could get going if the lineup made sense. How were Toews, Sharp, Stalberg, or Kane supposed to produce last night when every other shift they are on the ice with Morrison or Brunette or OD? Wow.



It was the OT goal bad goal? Sounds like it. I missed the goal and when I heard it turned off the TV right away (as I always do with OT Goals. I still haven't fully seen the game 7 Burrows goal from last year in it's entirety) but everyone says it\s a bad goal and I won't disagree.



Demoralizing though? It was the last goal of the game. I won't allow that to be the excuse for mailing in the first 14 minutes of the third period after dominating the game.
 

Mach29

New member
Joined:
Nov 27, 2011
Posts:
163
Liked Posts:
0
Down but not out.



Oduya is our #3 D man, and his game sucks. Haven't seen Sharp for awhile.Crawford loses his cool on a D mistake then compounds it himself.



I hope we can put up a better fight than last year, really didn't think we would need two trips back to Dogpatch.
 

Tim

New member
Joined:
May 22, 2010
Posts:
197
Liked Posts:
0
Putting all the Jack Wadding aside I am puzzled how the Hawks have scored with the man advantage in the waning seconds of the games pulling their goalie with their backs against the wall, and yet fail so miserably in their powerplay.



As for gutless, is that Q's coaching? Is he holding them back?The team has to many offensive weapons to be reigned in.



Finally, why are the Hawks letting Phoenix the lesser talented team establish a Phoenix style game? In other words why aren't the boys going balls out offensively ? Again is it Q holding them back?



This series is more frustrating than last years.
 

Top