Probie2429
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Nov 20, 2013
- Posts:
- 3,852
- Liked Posts:
- 2,476
Said a week ago or so, Nelson at 8. Whitehair to RT. Long sticks at RG. Sitton and Massie cut. Use those dollars to sign an actually center in FA.
Ok, this proves that there is no such thing as a sure thing."Chance Warmack from Alabama, I think, is the best football player I saw on tape this year, and Jonathan Cooper from North Carolina is just a tiny notch behind him - matter of fact, Cooper is probably a better athlete," Mayock said. "If either of those players is on the board at 10, I'd jump all over them."
I would have no hesitation taking Chance Warmack at 10, and to be honest with you, if I was one-through-nine, I wouldn't have any hesitation of taking him either. I think (the Titans are) in a good place to get one of those two players."
Multiple analysts have complimented Warmack's power and Cooper's effectiveness on the move. Mayock reiterated his belief in Warmack and Cooper by placing them in the conversation of players (along with tackles Luke Joeckel and Eric Fisher) that Kansas City should consider with the No. 1 overall pick.
Whitehair didn’t have a snap issue after the bye week if I can recall?
Whitehair is really good. I don’t want to move him unless an elite C falls into our laps.
Whitehair didn’t have a snap issue after the bye week if I can recall?
Whitehair is really good. I don’t want to move him unless an elite C falls into our laps.
Ok, this proves that there is no such thing as a sure thing.
"Chance Warmack from Alabama, I think, is the best football player I saw on tape this year, and Jonathan Cooper from North Carolina is just a tiny notch behind him - matter of fact, Cooper is probably a better athlete," Mayock said. "If either of those players is on the board at 10, I'd jump all over them."
I would have no hesitation taking Chance Warmack at 10, and to be honest with you, if I was one-through-nine, I wouldn't have any hesitation of taking him either. I think (the Titans are) in a good place to get one of those two players."
Multiple analysts have complimented Warmack's power and Cooper's effectiveness on the move. Mayock reiterated his belief in Warmack and Cooper by placing them in the conversation of players (along with tackles Luke Joeckel and Eric Fisher) that Kansas City should consider with the No. 1 overall pick.
You can say this shit about any potential draft pick, at any position, by simply quoting pre-draft predictions on players who turned out to be busts. If you advocated for taking a WR at 8, all I would have to say is-"Kevin White!?" So I guess we shouldn't ever pick a WR in the 1st round again?
You obviously don't think we should use our #8 pick on a G. I get it. And you probably have some valid points (current needs, positional value, etc). But don't try to strengthen your argument by putting out bullshit straw-men arguments. Q. Nelson is almost unanimously regarded as being the top OL prospect this year, and he is one of the best Guards coming out that i have ever seen.
I've read your posts, and enjoy them. Well thought-out. You're better than this.
What I am trying to convey is that Nelson is not a can’t miss prospect because there is no such thing. Everyone on this board thinks he’s an all pro lock.
Which is why I said I trust in Heistand. If he says take em, I don't have any problems with it.
You can say this shit about any potential draft pick, at any position, by simply quoting pre-draft predictions on players who turned out to be busts. If you advocated for taking a WR at 8, all I would have to say is-"Kevin White!?" So I guess we shouldn't ever pick a WR in the 1st round again?
You obviously don't think we should use our #8 pick on a G. I get it. And you probably have some valid points (current needs, positional value, etc). But don't try to strengthen your argument by putting out bullshit straw-men arguments. Q. Nelson is almost unanimously regarded as being the top OL prospect this year, and he is one of the best Guards coming out that i have ever seen.
I've read your posts, and enjoy them. Well thought-out. You're better than this.
In the very early draft process, many players have been mentioned as worthy or unworthy of the #8 position. One of those players that has been discussed is guard from Notre Dame Quenton Nelson.
Some of the positives are:
1. he might just be a generational guard prospect.
Would you give up the #8 pick for the next Logan Mankins?
2. With Sitton getting old while also having injury problems and Long looking at 3 surgeries, at the minimum, during the off-season, the Bears could use Nelson to fill one of their guard positions in 2018 and for the next decade or so. It would also allow for the Bears to fill their other guard position and have a good backup with Sitton and Long.
The negative comment for drafting Nelson is that drafting a guard at 8 is not a fashionable pick. Skill positions are always more well-received by the general public.
One positive reason for drafting Nelson is that it makes Sitton more valuable ... as a backup center (or even starter).
To be honest, Whitehair has not looked that good playing center with lots of question marks with his snapping. The reason that Whitehair played center is because we did not have anyone who was better. If the Bears can draft a center in the 4th round or pickup an ok center (get rid of Grasu, of course). Sitton did a good job playing center when he had to play the position. Moreover, with his loss of the little athleticism that he had, he is ideal for center where pulling is extremely rare for a center.
Why take Whitehair away from center? Besides his problems with the snap, he would be much more valuable as our starting RT. He already has experience playing LT in college. People did not see him as LT material in the NFL because they thought that he was not athletic enough to play LT in the NFL which is perfect for a RT where the position does not require as much athleticism.
Imagine a line of Leno Nelson Sitton Long Whitehair.
I could get excited with that line.
Adi if you had to choose between drafting Nelson or McGinchley to play RT, who would you choose?
I think it's an interesting decision that incorporates your positional value argument. You could keep Sitton a year and draft McGinchley to play RT or let Sitton go, draft Nelson and sign a RT.
Personally, I think I would rather go with McGinchley when I look at it like that. He has experience at RT and he might be an elite player at that position who could fill in at LT if anything happened to Leno.