- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 21,599
- Liked Posts:
- 26,656
- Location:
- Mountains to Sea
My favorite teams
This is a very funny place after losses.
Totally agree with these 2. I don't think we need to run much more like Remy says but we are a bit lower as a % than we should be and need to run more early along with those attempts to open things up. We abandon the run early in the game because it's not working, mainly because we aren't stretching the field. I'd like to see Wilson active and get him out there for just a few plays even if he's a one trick pony or decoy for now. Was nice seeing Wooton inside. I'd have used Peppers instead but it seems Corey was stout enough to make a difference.1. Play Jon Bostic
Our LBs can't cover anyone anyways at least put someone in at MLB who has some dynamic play making ability and punch.
2. Go Deep Earlier
Things seem to open up the minute we get a pass downfield. Until we do the defense cheats up takes away the short stuff.
Seems to be a bit subjective, no? QBs usually don't move toward a DE to avoid a sack, unless they are Rob Johnson or Blaine Gabbert, so I would assume "stepping up in the pocket" would be a pretty standard procedure. I didn't realize every time a QB stepped up in the pocket, he was being forced to throw the ball sooner than he wanted, per your lenghty-yet-repetitive definition of "QB hurry". I guess if you are telling me that every 21 times Cutler steps up in the pocket (i.e. "hurried") he is hit 3 times, that would sound pretty normal. I guess I never thought of the 18 non-hit step up in the pocket plays as hurries.
That must be a revolutionary concept. The NFL's passing pocket used to be like a left paranthesis: (
The tackles hold firm at the ends, while the interior line sags backwards. This new "reverse pocket" model of Kromer's where the tackles drop back and the interior line holds firm is amazing, yet also incredibly logical! I assume most NFL teams will be copying Kromer's model in the near future!
Totally agree with these 2. I don't think we need to run much more like Remy says but we are a bit lower as a % than we should be and need to run more early along with those attempts to open things up. We abandon the run early in the game because it's not working, mainly because we aren't stretching the field. I'd like to see Wilson active and get him out there for just a few plays even if he's a one trick pony or decoy for now. Was nice seeing Wooton inside. I'd have used Peppers instead but it seems Corey was stout enough to make a difference.
One thing I really like about earlier games was that we ran more consistently as a percentage throughout the game so if that's part of what Remy means, I agree. The # of runs is less important though I do think we need to keep closer to 40/60 run pass than we have lately.
One thing I learned from yesterday - if Cutler plays well in the 2nd half then DO NOT AND I MEAN DO NOT criticize the offense which includes him for a dismal 1st half. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FINAL SCORE OF THE GAME. YOU ARE IGNORANT IF YOU THINK THAT. SHUT UP. WHY? JUST BECAUSE. OKAY? GOOD. MEL TUCKER IS TO BLAME FOR OUR INABILITY TO CONVERT A 3RD DOWN AND SCORE POINTS ON OFFENSE IN THE FIRST HALF. RON RIVERA WILL FIX THAT.
Yes, if a DE rushes the QB and forces the QB to have to move away from him to avoid a sack, I am pretty sure it counts as a QB Hurry and has always counted as a QB hurry since the statistic was first created. A QB hurry is by definition when you pressure the QB without hitting him as if you hit him it is not a QB hurry but a QB hit. So I am not sure your confusion here. You do realize teams were tracking this before PFF came around right?
Kromer is known for building his offensive line inside out ie ensuring the inside is stout so that the QB has a pocket to step up into. I thought that was fairly common knowledge.
I thought you gave the three instances in which a "QB hurry" would take place in lieu of a "QB hit"...
I took this to mean that a QB stepping up in the pocket is the result of a "QB hurry"...I guess I interpreted this wrong.
No, that wasn't the issue. And I don't know how I could have possibly proposed that Mills is better than Free when Free's name had yet to be mentioned. I thought the issue was that Mills was rated the 68th best OT out of 70. Thought that was interesting, considering he's given up 0 sacks and 3 QB hits. Mills is on pace to play an entire season without allowing a QB sack...yet is the 68th best OT out of 70. Its just interesting how Mills excels at the tangible outcomes of sacks and hits, but is graded poorly with "QB hurries".
I think football people call it a pocket and most passes are thrown from the pocket. It's where the throwing lanes are at. The tackles are to keep engaged and take the DE to the outside to leave the middle open to have the throwing lanes develop.
Really? Wow!
remydat, serious question...would one of the improvements the Bears could make be the immediate benching of Mills and the possible benching of Bushrod? If not, why?
Those are potential reasons why a QB hurry does not result in a QB hit or sack. A DE puts pressure on a QB but sometimes that QB is able to step up in the pocket, get rid of the ball quickly, or escape the rush and scramble. So again, I did not define a QB hurry. A QB hurry was defined by others as pressure on a QB that does not result in a sack or hit. That has nothing to do with me.
But your definition of a hurry is an expected play by a tackle. So I'm confused at how Jay stepping up in the pocket to throw, constitutes a hurry?Yes and yet despite everyone having this same concept of a pocket, Frees has given up only 4 hurries while Mills has given up 21. The top 10 ranked Tackles have all given up 10 or less hurries. The top 58 tackles have all given up 15 or less hurries. The numbers are what they are.
Like I said, if you don't want to put a lot of stock into the QB hurry numbers then you don't have to but what do you want me to do? Pretend that those numbers don't have Mills giving up the 2nd most QB hurries at the tackle position in the entire NFL?
So it counts as a hurry if the tackle does his job perfectly like you just described?
But your definition of a hurry is an expected play by a tackle. So I'm confused at how Jay stepping up in the pocket to throw, constitutes a hurry?
Whoa...everyone has the same concept of a pocket? I honestly thought you said the pocket was invented by Kromer, that a QB stepping up in the pocket was something specific to a Kromer offense, because of the emphasis Kromer puts on the interior line.
Anyways, the best OT has given up 2 sacks, while the 68th best OT has given up zero sacks. Amazing. That would be like the best closer in baseball having 2 blown saves early in the year, while the 68th best closer in baseball had converted every save opportunity.
No, I thought that concept was invented by Lovie Smith...much like how the passing pocket was invented by Aaron Kromer. Before Lovie, teams would crash their DEs inside the tackles in passing situations. Lovie Smith was the first guy to have the DEs rush to the outside. The reason for this is because Lovie believed in a strong interior pass rush from the DTs. Its incredibly how many trendsetters the Bears coaching staff has had over the years. Ralph Jones, Clark Shaughnessy, George Allen, Buddy Ryan....Aaron Kromer, Lovie Smith.
YES! THATS THE WHOLE POINT! You can't even describe what a "QB Hurry" is...the 'stat' itself is completely subjective...yet you expect people to think there is some sort of regular standard when it comes to applying this vague concept.
Seems to be a bit subjective, no? QBs usually don't move toward a DE to avoid a sack, unless they are Rob Johnson or Blaine Gabbert, so I would assume "stepping up in the pocket" would be a pretty standard procedure. I didn't realize every time a QB stepped up in the pocket, he was being forced to throw the ball sooner than he wanted, per your lenghty-yet-repetitive definition of "QB hurry". I guess if you are telling me that every 21 times Cutler steps up in the pocket (i.e. "hurried") he is hit 3 times, that would sound pretty normal. I guess I never thought of the 18 non-hit step up in the pocket plays as hurries.
That must be a revolutionary concept. The NFL's passing pocket used to be like a left paranthesis: (
The tackles hold firm at the ends, while the interior line sags backwards. This new "reverse pocket" model of Kromer's where the tackles drop back and the interior line holds firm is amazing, yet also incredibly logical! I assume most NFL teams will be copying Kromer's model in the near future!
Great analogy. What if Romo is better at moving in the pocket than Cutler, so Romo avoids the dreaded-yet-superfluous "QB Hurry" situation whereas Cutler makes it appear that Mills' man is (literally) always one step away from a sack or a QB hit?
I'm just amazed at how an outcome can be dependent on other people, but only at times and in ways that you want it to be.
WHAT?Well if you honestly thought that it probably hints at a reading comprehension problem.
If the 68th best closer in baseball converted every save opportunity but 21 times his outfielders robbed a hitter of a game winning home run then would you say he was better than the best closer who blew two saves despite blowing away the other team all the other times?
If you can't understand that the outcome is dependent on people other than the closer or the tackle then again, must be a comprehension problem.