[A] The Bowman Effect

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
With the deadline looming, Blackhawks GM Stan Bowman has the equivalent of nearly $15 million in cap space that is growing in size every single day.



Two and a half years after being hired in place of Dale Tallon, perhaps we can go back and piece together the puzzle that Bowman is attempting to put together. Adding Brendan Morrison last week only built Bowmans trade résumé, adding another clue to the search, but once you put all of it together the picture starts to become a little more clear that the direction Bowman may be taking could have provided enough smoke and mirrors to get away with a state of rebuilding.



(Listings are in order of time completion)



2010 TRADES



Cam Barker ⇛ Nick Leddy

Kris Versteeg ⇛ Viktor Stalberg, Philippe Paradis, Chris DiDomenico

Dustin Byfuglien, Ben Eager, Brent Sopel ⇛ Jeremy Morin, Kevin Hayes, Justin Holl

Colin Fraser ⇛ Mirko Hoefflin

30th pick 2010 to NYI ⇛ Ludvig Rensfeldt, Kent Simpson

32nd pick 2010 to TOR ⇛ Brandon Saad, Michael Paliotta

43rd pick 2010 to TOR ⇛ Jimmy Hayes

Andrew Ladd ⇛ Adam Clendening



2011 TRADES



Jack Skille, Hugh Jessiman, David Pacan ⇛ Michael Frolik, Alexander Salak

Troy Brouwer ⇛ Philip Danault

Brian Campbell ⇛ Cap Space, err Rostislav Olesz

Tomas Kopecky ⇛ Steve Montador *

Brian Connelly ⇛ Brendan Morrison



*In sending the negotiating rights of Tomas Kopecky to Florida for a conditional 7th round pick, the Blackhawks flipped the same pick to Buffalo for the negotiating rights to Steve Montador. In a nutshell, that pick was integral in both deals, connecting them together.



WAIVER WIRE



No additions that remain in the organization



FREE AGENTS (UFA, RFA)



Patrick Kane, Jonathan Toews, Duncan Keith, John Scott, Niklas Hjalmarsson, Bryan Bickell, Nick Leddy, Brandon Pirri, Dylan Olsen, Brent Seabrook, Jimmy Hayes, Corey Crawford, Byron Froese, David Gilbert, Alexander Salak, Steve Montador, Jamal Mayers, Sean O'Donnell, Andrew Brunette, Dan Carcillo, Viktor Stalberg, Sami Lepisto, Michael Frolik, Patrick Sharp, Ray Emery, Mark McNeill, Philip Danault, Andrew Shaw



Of course, the definition of rebuild is a loose term. No, I am not suggesting Bowman is going to dismantle this team or any sort of ridiculous notion that he will even remotely entertain the thought of trading any of his core players. However, it's clear to me that during most of his tenure, Stan has been in rebuild mode in a different sense. He's acquiring band-aids to fill the gaps until "his" players are ready to fit in the line-up. "His" players being all the youth he has acquired through the trade market. Luckily for him, unlike Dale Tallon, he has a fantastic core to hold the fort while these players develop and become NHL-ready.



The acquisition of Brendan Morrison was far from confusing when looking at his track record. Even last year with limited cap space, Bowman was able to swing a few deals to acquire Michael Frolik, Ryan Johnson, and Chris Campoli at the deadline in an effort to provide depth to the roster. Unfortunately, it didn't work, and Bowmans band-aid scheme failed for the first season. Given his circumstances, he was given a pass due to the contract demands of the prior summer forcing him to ship key players.



Over the summer, he continued the trend, signing 6 UFA's to 1-year deals. Perhaps further proof of Bowman's plan unfolding before our very eyes--almost eerily similar to Dale Tallon's approach during his first couple seasons. This time things would be different through the fan perception, the Blackhawks had plenty of cap space and the depth seemed to be stronger. I don't want to say it was wrong to think that, because the deadline has not passed yet and anything can happen. But all indications point to Bowman once again filling important roles with another band-aid instead of a solid solution.



Is it wrong? No. Does it give the Blackhawks the best chance to win right now? Probably not. But at some point the game has to change for Bowman, no longer should he be looking for deals to improve the future while patching up the present moment but shift the philosophy in realizing his window of opportunity might be starting as early as right now.



Perhaps this year is the wrong time for that change, maybe next year when Saad, Shaw, Hayes, Olsen, Smith, Pirri, Morin, are all ready to fill the shoes left behind by the old-timers will be the moment Stan changes his philosophy from "rebuild" to "this is the year". Because, lets be honest, if that is his plan then perhaps that truly is the best route to take if the Blackhawks want to carry the Cup through Chicago again. This isn't to say this year is lost, because it isn't. But perhaps more of an acceptance of what Bowman is trying to accomplish. The writing is on the wall, it's just a matter of perception.



Click here to view the article
 

Mach29

New member
Joined:
Nov 27, 2011
Posts:
163
Liked Posts:
0
Sounds good on paper - I'm glad there's a plan to what's turning a little frustrating and ugly lately. Would be better if it was more from Bowman.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
Spot on.



This goes hand in hand with my article on letting the youth develop. Jimmy Hayes obviously could play on this team and I bet next year he gets a shot for top 6 minutes or even 3rd line. I'd like to see Olsen eventually take Hammer's minutes away, but that depends on the rest of this season.



Sharp-Toews-Kane

LW- Prospect or Bolland-Hossa



To me next season we have openings at LW and Center for the top two lines. If Stalberg keeps up his momentum and consitency, then he could be the LW. Hell, Saad might be too good for juniors next year.



Tha's how I see it.
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
I agree Trev. While it's frustrating to see old band-aids like Brunette, Morrison, and O'Donnell in the line-up right now... you just have to remember what is waiting in the pipe-line.



To me, it's pretty clear Bowman wants his guys to develop. I truly believe Bowman thinks that next year will start our window of opportunity. Similar to how Tallon had a window of about 2 years to win the Cup with that team. After that, those young kids will demand big contracts and he'll start the process all over again. This isn't to say we won't be competitive during his rebuilds, because we have a great core, but it's quite obvious that the Salary Cap era is going to be about capitalizing on the low contracts of good, young players. The problem is timing--he has to let them develop and hope a good chunk of them can produce around the same time while their contracts are still low.
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
Spot on.



This goes hand in hand with my article on letting the youth develop. Jimmy Hayes obviously could play on this team and I bet next year he gets a shot for top 6 minutes or even 3rd line. I'd like to see Olsen eventually take Hammer's minutes away, but that depends on the rest of this season.



Sharp-Toews-Kane

LW- Prospect or Bolland-Hossa



To me next season we have openings at LW and Center for the top two lines. If Stalberg keeps up his momentum and consitency, then he could be the LW. Hell, Saad might be too good for juniors next year.



Tha's how I see it.



if Q got his head out of his ass, the top six is already chosen, and signed for the next 4+ years



Stalberg-Toews-Kane

Sharp-Bolland-Hossa



all those guys are locked up except Stalberg. It's the bottom six that is worrisome.
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
oh, and the Ladd deal was for Vishnevskiy and a second (Clandening) I think the worst thing is, Ladd was the biggest player we lost that season (at least to me) and we got basically nothing for him.
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
I know that, but I only included players that are still in the organization to show what we've gained out of each deal. For example, Barker didn't just land us Leddy, and technically Kopecky was not traded for Montador. It's pretty much cut to the bottom line of what we received for each deal.



I'm not sure we got "nothing" for Ladd yet, Clendening looks very promising.
 

CLWolf81

Fan Captain
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,107
Liked Posts:
96
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
I know that, but I only included players that are still in the organization to show what we've gained out of each deal. For example, Barker didn't just land us Leddy, and technically Kopecky was not traded for Montador. It's pretty much cut to the bottom line of what we received for each deal.



I'm not sure we got "nothing" for Ladd yet, Clendening looks very promising.



Prospects Camp proved that. He looked good from what I saw. Liking that kid. On the bright side, he's a D-man, and he looks like a decently balanced d-man... we don't have many of those around. He'd make a great 3 or 4 someday.
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
Prospects Camp proved that. He looked good from what I saw. Liking that kid. On the bright side, he's a D-man, and he looks like a decently balanced d-man... we don't have many of those around. He'd make a great 3 or 4 someday.



Allow me to retort, We didn't get nearly as much for a player of Ladd's calibre as I would have liked. Another Russian who fled to the KHL because he didn't make the team right away. **** him AND Makarov. If you want something, you gotta earn it.
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
oh, and the Ladd deal was for Vishnevskiy and a second (Clandening) I think the worst thing is, Ladd was the biggest player we lost that season (at least to me) and we got basically nothing for him.



That's because the organization completely undervalued Ladd. I recall several of us asking several times why Ladd was never used on the PP or PK with this club, when it was obvious he would be successful doing either. Q seemed completely opposed to giving him a chance aside from the shutdown line.
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
That's because the organization completely undervalued Ladd. I recall several of us asking several times why Ladd was never used on the PP or PK with this club, when it was obvious he would be successful doing either. Q seemed completely opposed to giving him a chance aside from the shutdown line.



Scary to think about when Bolland is being toyed with in a similar way.
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
Bingo.



Except I heard the lines at practice were as follows so maybe he's finally fucking getting it with Bolland:



65-19-88

10-36-81

16-17-25

29-22-67



Way to reward Stalberg by demoting him though. If Kruger isn't going to play center, there's no reason for him to be up here.
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
They aren't playing Kruger at center because he's terrible at faceoffs. Not sure why Shaw is on the 1st line, he's better suited on line 3 or 4.
 

Pez68

Fire Waldron
Joined:
Oct 31, 2014
Posts:
5,020
Liked Posts:
838
I know that, but there are better winger options in Rockford for the bottom six. If Kruger isn't up here to play center, he shouldn't be up here. He really contributes that little.
 

ericthered

New member
Joined:
May 19, 2010
Posts:
43
Liked Posts:
0
More details/minutia from the Bowman ledger:



The pick Bowman sent to Ottawa for Chris Campoli (Bowman also got a conditional 2012 7th rd pick) , ended up in Detroit via a trade (they moved out of the 1st rd to get a 2nd rd pick); and they used it to select in the 2nd rd 2011 Draft: #48 D Xavier Ouellet



Potulny playing in Ottawa this season is the condition for the Hawks to get this 7th rd. pick, so it's unlikely as he's currently in the Caps org. Hershey Bears AHL. However if Washington somehow trades him to Ottawa (and Ottawa suits him up for 1 game...bring on that 7th rd. pick).



The #32 pick that CHI gave Tor for the 2010 Draft was in a roundabout way connected to the Phil Kessel Boston trade and the Hawks trade of Robert Lang (to MTL).



Tor used that pick to select #32 C Jared Knight



The Hawks traded their first-round pick 2010 Draft to the NYI on June 25, 2010 that sent a pair of second round picks (#35 and #58 overall) to Chicago in exchange for this pick.



Hawks used those second round picks (as you noted Ton) on:

#35 was Ludvig Rensfeldt

#58 was Kent Simpson



NYI used that first round pick on: #30 (last pick of the first round) C Brock Nelson



In the 2nd round the Hawks traded with Tor for Jimmy Hayes (that pick sent to Toronto was from the Rene Bourque deal with Calgary that Dale Tallon made).



43rd pick in the 2010 draft (the Jimmy Hayes trade) netted Toronto LW Brad Ross.
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
I know that, but there are better winger options in Rockford for the bottom six. If Kruger isn't up here to play center, he shouldn't be up here. He really contributes that little.



couldn't fucking agree more. Kruger should be in Rockford if there isn't a center spot for him. The third line wingers should be Shaw and Hayes, with Stalberg on the top line with Toews and Kane.
 

Maiden

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
1,148
Liked Posts:
0
They aren't playing Kruger at center because he's terrible at faceoffs. Not sure why Shaw is on the 1st line, he's better suited on line 3 or 4.



Just because you're listed as the center doesnt mean you have to take face offs. There's plenty of center men who don't.
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,845
Liked Posts:
2,551
More details/minutia from the Bowman ledger:



The pick Bowman sent to Ottawa for Chris Campoli (Bowman also got a conditional 2012 7th rd pick) , ended up in Detroit via a trade (they moved out of the 1st rd to get a 2nd rd pick); and they used it to select in the 2nd rd 2011 Draft: #48 D Xavier Ouellet



Potulny playing in Ottawa this season is the condition for the Hawks to get this 7th rd. pick, so it's unlikely as he's currently in the Caps org. Hershey Bears AHL. However if Washington somehow trades him to Ottawa (and Ottawa suits him up for 1 game...bring on that 7th rd. pick).



The #32 pick that CHI gave Tor for the 2010 Draft was in a roundabout way connected to the Phil Kessel Boston trade and the Hawks trade of Robert Lang (to MTL).



Tor used that pick to select #32 C Jared Knight



The Hawks traded their first-round pick 2010 Draft to the NYI on June 25, 2010 that sent a pair of second round picks (#35 and #58 overall) to Chicago in exchange for this pick.



Hawks used those second round picks (as you noted Ton) on:

#35 was Ludvig Rensfeldt

#58 was Kent Simpson



NYI used that first round pick on: #30 (last pick of the first round) C Brock Nelson



In the 2nd round the Hawks traded with Tor for Jimmy Hayes (that pick sent to Toronto was from the Rene Bourque deal with Calgary that Dale Tallon made).



43rd pick in the 2010 draft (the Jimmy Hayes trade) netted Toronto LW Brad Ross.
Sweet jesus I don't know how you guys keep track of all this stuff.
 

Ton

New member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
3,991
Liked Posts:
124
Location:
Park Ridge, IL
Just because you're listed as the center doesnt mean you have to take face offs. There's plenty of center men who don't.



Name one.
 

Top