[A] Western Conference Quarterfinals - Game 1: CHI @ PHX

PatrickSharpRules

New member
Joined:
May 16, 2010
Posts:
1,986
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
Southside, Chicago
18417359.jpg
 

mikita's helmet

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
7,876
Liked Posts:
1,107
Location:
Anacortes, WA via Glenview, IL
PSR said:
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica">
18417359.jpg
</p>



Couldn't have said it better!
<
 

Rex

Chief Blackcock
Joined:
Jul 17, 2010
Posts:
3,447
Liked Posts:
449
Location:
Grimson's Sweet Ass
What's to like? And don't give me the, all our best players are on the same line bullshit...



um, because our best player is back, and Q didn't have to **** up our very productive 2nd and 3rd line to make it work?



What do you honestly dislike about it?
 

chasman

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
960
Liked Posts:
0
Location:
323 row 1 seats 1 and 2
would rather have olsen in there instead of o'donnell
 

CLWolf81

Fan Captain
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,107
Liked Posts:
96
Location:
Chicago, Illinois
The Q Mustache line generator wasn't used tonight?



Saw OD there in the lineup, so I assumed this. Why's he in there, anyway?
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,852
Liked Posts:
2,553
So far OD hasn't been noticable, which is a good thing. Bick had a good first period I feel. Which is good.
 

the canadian dream

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
6,402
Liked Posts:
14
That first yotes goal was a cluster **** of slop.



Was a nice missed to many men also but what the **** was hammer doing that shift? Jesus ****.



Sharp is also playing like garbage.
 

the canadian dream

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
6,402
Liked Posts:
14
So if hossa isnt going to do anything on the rw then why play kane on the lw where he rarely is as productive?



Never liked kane on lw esp when hossa goes invisible.
 

the canadian dream

New member
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
6,402
Liked Posts:
14
Hawks getting outhit 33-13 in first two periods.



Losing 2-1.



i think the faceoff, blocked shots and give away stats so far through 2 periods are more impactfull than the hits. Not that i disagree being more physical never hurts.



Really should never have counted that pyatt goal but teams gotta show its ability to play against adversity like they have in the past. There are going to be controversial goals...there always are.



Win some faceoffs and keep the god damn give aways down in the third and its still winable.



Get kane off the left side also and someone slap sharp awake.
 

roshinaya

fnord
Donator
Joined:
May 15, 2010
Posts:
3,533
Liked Posts:
440
Must be good to know that you can take as many penalties as you want knowing that the Hawks can't do shit with them. It's like no one on the PP unit knows how to enter the zone and once there they have no idea what they are supposed to do. Keep on bombing from the point, if it doesn't hit someone on the way towards the goal it's going wide anyways. And in the defensive zone they keep doing dumb shit as it's going out of fashion. Forcing plays, not going for the simple play and just plain brainfarts. In one of the PK's Seabs had the puck with a chance to clear it, but instead he passes to someone on the board who goes on to lose it and Phoenix keeps it in the zone. C'mon.
 

Variable

New member
Joined:
Jul 24, 2010
Posts:
3,023
Liked Posts:
122
Haha, well both teams share the same colors, what can you do? Didn't the Hawks have white rally towels or something the Cup year? Waving the white flag.
 

Top