- Joined:
- Jun 25, 2010
- Posts:
- 20,012
- Liked Posts:
- 9,558
- Location:
- Next to the beef gristle mill
My favorite teams
It has never worked. I hate pulling the circle logic out, but trust me here. You said you went to Hubbard, I lived in the area. I know where you're coming from. Not completely, and I'm not saying I know what it's like to be you, but I am saying I can relate. I also lived in shitty places for most of my life, and again, been to many shitty combat zones on the front lines. I know violence and I know force, and it just doesn't work. It's the flaws of the Broken Window Fallacy.
Broken Window Fallacy basically states that if you destroy something, it gets rebuild better than it was before.
If I go to a shop owners ugly window, throw a rock through it, then that shop owner is forced to replace it with a new window. Sounds good right?
Well no, the resources that went into putting in the new window was already in motion to go towards more beneficial goods and services.
If the Broken Window Fallacy actually actually true, then the places with the most violence and destruction would benefit the most, but in fact, they never benefit from destruction and violence. These people cause a traumatic domino effect that takes away freedom over time.
Of course, there are many people who have explained the Broken Window Fallacy better than I, and I tried to grab a clip off youtube, but most of the authors for those videos are pushing some agenda that spins the basic idea to prove their arguments on politicians, but they also don't get it. Because they want to destroy people through forms of media, they are contradicting their argument. This one isn't too bad.
