Are The Bulls Better Without Derrick Rose?

Status
Not open for further replies.

FirstTimer

v. 2.0: Fully Modded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
May 4, 2010
Posts:
27,077
Liked Posts:
15,145
I think it's a stupid fucking idea.

No the Bulls are not better without their best player and one of the top 5-10 players in the NBA
 

FirstTimer

v. 2.0: Fully Modded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
May 4, 2010
Posts:
27,077
Liked Posts:
15,145
Like I said read it before you freak out

It's not wroth reading because the initial question is stupid.



It's a not as if I read that question and say to myself...."Hmm I wonder if they are....?" Interesting premise. Let's find out more!
 

Utahbullsfan

New member
Joined:
May 11, 2011
Posts:
1,468
Liked Posts:
178
It's not wroth reading because the initial question is stupid.



It's a not as if I read that question and say to myself...."Hmm I wonder if they are....?" Interesting premise. Let's find out more!

Cool story bro...

Its just an article in response to fans around the NBA saying the Bulls were better without Drose... Not actually saying they are
 

FirstTimer

v. 2.0: Fully Modded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
May 4, 2010
Posts:
27,077
Liked Posts:
15,145
Cool story bro...

Its just an article in response to fans around the NBA saying the Bulls were better without Drose... Not actually saying they are

NO WAI!!?!?!?!?

You posted this and asked me what I thought. I've told you what I thought.

Don't like it? Quit posting shit and asking what people think.
 

Scoot26

Administrator
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
41,341
Liked Posts:
28,437
No, we're not better without Derrick Rose. See our offense go stagnant last night? Yeah, thats us without Derrick Rose.
 

FirstTimer

v. 2.0: Fully Modded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
May 4, 2010
Posts:
27,077
Liked Posts:
15,145
No, we're not better without Derrick Rose. See our offense go stagnant last night? Yeah, thats us without Derrick Rose.

Very true.

Thank God UtahBullsFan wrote an article clearing this up.
 

Utahbullsfan

New member
Joined:
May 11, 2011
Posts:
1,468
Liked Posts:
178
No, we're not better without Derrick Rose. See our offense go stagnant last night? Yeah, thats us without Derrick Rose.

Exactly what I said in the article, but I did write it like a week ago when everyone was actually saying that the Bulls are better without him.
 

inactiveuser1

The Legend
Donator
Joined:
Sep 11, 2011
Posts:
8,250
Liked Posts:
2,804
No way were better without Rose but it was interesting to read.

I have three people who posted in this thread on ignore and I guarantee all they did was rip on utahbullsfan. Way to make the forum look like a nice place :clap:
 

MRubio52

New member
Joined:
Apr 4, 2012
Posts:
1,693
Liked Posts:
385
Location:
Chicago
Without reading anything in this thread...No.

Stop following Skip Bayless, go talk to Rick Bayless, he's more interesting and he'll feed you really well.
 

Uman85

Oh Yeah.
Donator
Joined:
Apr 10, 2011
Posts:
16,341
Liked Posts:
5,990
The bench has stepped up well in Rose's absence, but that's more of a one or two game high for them. These guys couldn't sustain it for a whole season without Rose. He is the glue guy on this team and one of the league's best players. No team will benefit long-term without their top player.
 

Bear06

New member
Joined:
Nov 26, 2011
Posts:
3,371
Liked Posts:
577
Location:
Chicago, IL
Without reading anything in this thread...No.

Stop following Skip Bayless, go talk to Rick Bayless, he's more interesting and he'll feed you really well.

Lulz Yessir!
 

Axl Rose

and I knew the silence of the world
Joined:
Oct 11, 2011
Posts:
12,246
Liked Posts:
4,405
yup we are

shoulda drafted Beasley
 

Utahbullsfan

New member
Joined:
May 11, 2011
Posts:
1,468
Liked Posts:
178
The bench has stepped up well in Rose's absence, but that's more of a one or two game high for them. These guys couldn't sustain it for a whole season without Rose. He is the glue guy on this team and one of the league's best players. No team will benefit long-term without their top player.

THIS! :beer:
 

DCguy

Active member
Joined:
Dec 2, 2010
Posts:
1,791
Liked Posts:
262
Location:
Washington, DC
The team isn't better without Rose. They just gained some confidence that they can hold the fort while Rose is out. But that should translate into them being better with Rose rather than being better without Rose. But time will tell if that will be the case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top