Of course the right teams "scare" me
- The Dodgers have an equally good rotation 1-4 as the Cubs do while having a few very good hitters that can be the difference in a low scoring game. Kershaw has historically struggled in the playoffs but if he hasn't thrown 230+ innings this time, it might be different.
- The Nationals have the potential to be dangerous in a short series with Scherzer/Strasburg if those guys are healthy
- The Cubs don't have a "typical" lineup so if guys struggle in games 1 and 2, how do you balance natural moving of guys without making it seem like a panic?
- Every starting pitcher on the team has a drastically lower ERA compared to FIP; what if that normalizes in a short series and your pitching goes from "drastically better" to "about equal"? The Cubs ERA for starters at 2.90 is much lower than the next four (Nationals 3.50, Mets at 3.61, Giants at 3.83, Dodgers at 3.99) but in terms of FIP, it's much closer (Nationals and Mets are tied at the best with 3.59, Dodgers next at 3.65, then Cubs at 3.77, then Giants at 3.84). Also, teams in the playoffs start bad starters less so the potential to win isn't the same as it is during the regular season
Cubs W/L with Arrieta/Lester/Hendricks: 57-26, .686 winning percentage
Dodgers W/L with Maeda/Kershaw/Hill/Urias: 43-18, .705 winning percentage
If the Cubs lose to the Dodgers, it would not surprise me. If they lost to a healthy Nationals team, it would not surprise me. Losing to anyone else in the NL would surprise me.