Is that what I said? I know that isn't what I said. You really need to gain some reading comprehension skills. You can throw around your smileys all you want, but they mean nothing when you are basically making up what you are talking about because it isn't something I have said before.
First off, when talking about St. Louis it was in comparison to Malkin and the MVP race. I said that St. Louis improves Stamkos' stats and helps make Stamkos run, where Malkin is the type of player that makes everyone around him better more so than Stamkos does. St. Louis is very underrated in my eyes and Mike Babcock seems to have the same idea in many ways. I said that Stamkos isn't the type of player to make things happen on his own and usually needs to find the soft spot in the ice and then be a complete snipe show. Did you see Stamkos' two goals last night? For those two goals, he probably controlled the puck for under 1 second before lighting up Thomas, nothing wrong with that at all but it does feed into what I have been saying about Stamkos and finding those soft areas. Stamkos is still an amazing player and easily a top 10 talent in the NHL.
Reading comprehension.
