Teddy KGB
Cultural Icon
- Joined:
- Apr 25, 2011
- Posts:
- 7,801
- Liked Posts:
- 4,642
I'm not sure how this is in any way comparable to the Bears' situation. You make it sound like the Bears can simply "decide" to emulate the Patriots success by copying their philosophy. The Patriots can plug in whomever on offense because they have arguably the greatest QB in NFL history. They can plug in whomever on defense because they have arguably the greatest defensive coach in NFL history. They draft well, so they can (usually) replace the players they lose in free agency.
Yeah, once the Bears have the best QB of all-time, the best Head Coach of all-time, and have a foundation of several good drafts...then they can operate under the Patriots philosophy.
If the Bears continue to lose productive players and not replace them, then they will never make it to a Super Bowl (again?).
I don't think you understand. We are not saying the Bears are directly copying the Patriots. They aren't.
What we are saying is that the Bears now, like the Pats, have established a football philosophy that they want players to buy into, or they will be gone, which is just what the Pats do.
They could be very different philosophies, for all we know. But it will give not only the Bears team, but the whole organization an identity and a culture that can breed success.
Now obviously, it all depends on how successful they end up being. A culture of failure is not a culture worth keeping. But the thing is, John Fox has rebuilt 2 other teams into Superbowl contenders. There's a track record there. So if you WERE going to go this route, you at least have someone with that track record at the helm.
Hence why we're all just along for the ride and waiting to see what comes of this. But I am not opposed to the Bears cutting people who don't fit their vision or undermine their culture for the sake of talent - such things can end up being a distraction and even ruining the culture they are trying to implement on a locker room level. Impatience doesn't breed success.