Bears Team Philosophy

ILoveDick

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 19, 2014
Posts:
19,713
Liked Posts:
11,017
If this is their system you can almost count on it being a joke in a year or two. The Bears' approach is guys pretending to be data scientists using analytics.

:cutty:
 

Hawkeye OG

Formerly Hawkeye
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Mar 1, 2015
Posts:
34,322
Liked Posts:
36,126
Fair enough but soon Poles will need to decide if he is going to exercise JF's 5th year option, and giving him an at least competent O-Line to work behind would help. And if it doesn't fit your "scheme", change your scheme. Because what ever "scheme" they trotted out on the field last year was a massive fail. Can you imagine how anemic the Bears O is, if JF's isn't a scrambling fool?
I get what you're saying - Bears should be doing everything in their power to build around Fields so they can actually assess him. Because, as you said, we know he can run.

I disagree with the fact that you're acting like this is some 11th hour crisis for the Bears like a Daniel Jones type situation. Fields just finished his 2nd year lol. Personally, think Poles with have his answer on Fields at the end of 2023.
 

ILoveDick

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 19, 2014
Posts:
19,713
Liked Posts:
11,017
Keep in mind, the common complaint about Nagy was not adjusting his scheme to fit his players...so now we're excited about only finding players that fit our scheme? Seems like a lot of talent would be instantly excluded.

Sorry, putting scheme over talent seems like a loser to me.
 

Nelly

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 13, 2018
Posts:
7,895
Liked Posts:
9,310
No, Davis is a solid pickup that perfectly matches the scheme. Again, not every team can suck year after year, allowing them to get top 10 players every single year, most often top 5. Sometimes, solid is good enough.
Imagine thinking that a guard signed for $10 mil per year isn't an upgrade to one of the worst lines in football last year.
 

Nelly

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 13, 2018
Posts:
7,895
Liked Posts:
9,310
Keep in mind, the common complaint about Nagy was not adjusting his scheme to fit his players...so now we're excited about only finding players that fit our scheme? Seems like a lot of talent would be instantly excluded.

Sorry, putting scheme over talent seems like a loser to me.
Fair point, but it's not the entire offensive scheme, just the blocking scheme. Nagy refused to use Fields' running ability, and at a time, did the same with Trubisky. Getsy used that to his advantage and we all saw the results, even with a shitty line.
 

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
20,540
Liked Posts:
4,871
Fair point, but it's not the entire offensive scheme, just the blocking scheme. Nagy refused to use Fields' running ability, and at a time, did the same with Trubisky. Getsy used that to his advantage and we all saw the results, even with a shitty line.
Yes, when nothing else worked, Getsy let JF run.
Brilliant!!
As a result, what do we know about Justin Fields the passer?
Not much.
Newsflash Luke, this isn't Aaron Rodgers your working with, you actually have to "develop" JF.
I am not sure how running for his life is part of his development.
 

Nelly

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 13, 2018
Posts:
7,895
Liked Posts:
9,310
Yes, when nothing else worked, Getsy let JF run.
Brilliant!!
As a result, what do we know about Justin Fields the passer?
Not much.
Newsflash Luke, this isn't Aaron Rodgers your working with, you actually have to "develop" JF.
I am not sure how running for his life is part of his development.
Have you ever said anything worthwhile?
 

Nelly

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 13, 2018
Posts:
7,895
Liked Posts:
9,310
Fair point, but it's not the entire offensive scheme, just the blocking scheme. Nagy refused to use Fields' running ability, and at a time, did the same with Trubisky. Getsy used that to his advantage and we all saw the results, even with a shitty line.
Adding to this: the outside zone blocking scheme would mean you're looking for more of a specific type of back as well, which is perhaps one reason we let Montgomery go in favor of a guy like Foreman.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
64,946
Liked Posts:
41,734
I dig this as well. Its a smart way to use analytics in football as pertains to the team.

Honestly, it highlights one of the biggest beefs I have with 3rd party analytics in football, trying to grade players etc.

Sure, there's some positions that can work well - sacks for a defensive lineman for instance.


But the analytics for Offensive linemen are pure atrocity. And there's good reason for it - as much as fans and analysts want to simplify it, there are different types of offensive lines all across the NFL, playing different schemes and if even in the same scheme might have a variety of assignments.

The analytics on offensive line play, by my eye, take NONE of that into account and simply seem to grade it by whether or not a member of the defense whom the 3rd party THINKS you were supposed to block got by you - and if you get in between them and the QB, even if you get pushed back 50 yards and into the quarterback, they still grade it as "successful" - which is how we got such a high grade for Charles Leno Jr a few years ago when most of us watching knew he was ass, and it was also how Braxton Jones got such a high grade despite getting bullrushed all the time and needing help all season.

Sorry, got off topic there.


Point I am making, is that the analytics are specialized to every team, and I love the way Poles has gone about maximizing it.

Except of course the Bears metrics on Jones seems to be aligned with what 3rd party sites say as they are content with him starting.

Of course teams will have their own analytics and data but the reality is most of the team these guys are never as bad as fans claim. Fans tend to turn on players and then imagine everything they do is bad. Case in point Leno still is finding work and is considered an adequate LT in NFL circles.
 
Joined:
Aug 6, 2020
Posts:
2,011
Liked Posts:
2,897
Yes, when nothing else worked, Getsy let JF run.
Brilliant!!
As a result, what do we know about Justin Fields the passer?
Not much.
Newsflash Luke, this isn't Aaron Rodgers your working with, you actually have to "develop" JF.
I am not sure how running for his life is part of his development.
you're*
 

Mighty Joe Young

Living in Troll's Heads Rent-Free for Decades
Joined:
Feb 8, 2021
Posts:
11,993
Liked Posts:
10,038
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Bears
Except of course the Bears metrics on Jones seems to be aligned with what 3rd party sites say as they are content with him starting.

Of course teams will have their own analytics and data but the reality is most of the team these guys are never as bad as fans claim. Fans tend to turn on players and then imagine everything they do is bad. Case in point Leno still is finding work and is considered an adequate LT in NFL circles.

We will see. You say they are content with him starting. Let's see how that pans out - not just this season, but next as well.

I bet he's a swing tackle by the start of the 2024 regular season.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
64,946
Liked Posts:
41,734
Keep in mind, the common complaint about Nagy was not adjusting his scheme to fit his players...so now we're excited about only finding players that fit our scheme? Seems like a lot of talent would be instantly excluded.

Sorry, putting scheme over talent seems like a loser to me.

Changing a scheme for your franchise QB is very different than doing so for a single OL that has to work in tandem with 4 other OL.

Further, most of the time the plays are already part of a scheme and it is just a question of calling plays that fit what a QB does best.

So you go away from the outside zone to accomodate Brown but then the other 4 OL are better in an outside zone so how is that going to work? Makes no sense.
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
41,045
Liked Posts:
38,401
Location:
Cumming
If's but's and nuts. To date, the Bears O-line is not any better than it was in 2022. The point is, it should have been a focus, not paying top dollar for a LB'er.
Sorry but it is better.
 

bamainatlanta

You wake him up, you keep him up
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Aug 10, 2013
Posts:
41,045
Liked Posts:
38,401
Location:
Cumming
Keep in mind, the common complaint about Nagy was not adjusting his scheme to fit his players...so now we're excited about only finding players that fit our scheme? Seems like a lot of talent would be instantly excluded.

Sorry, putting scheme over talent seems like a loser to me.
I’m pretty sure that this is the exact opposite of Belichik and his system. He’s always going to find guys that fit his system.
 

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
20,540
Liked Posts:
4,871
We ended up with the No 1 pick and 100m in cap.
And you pissed away both......
Last time Bears had the #9 pick, they drafted Leonard Floyd. Did not make it to a second contract. Then again, not many Bears first rounders do. You got a very good, not great WR.
 

Top