LordKOTL
Scratched for Vorobiev
- Joined:
- Dec 8, 2014
- Posts:
- 8,701
- Liked Posts:
- 3,062
- Location:
- PacNW
My favorite teams
Ducks win and we've fully tanked out.
Hopefully Columbus gets a point in their last gameDucks are losing, and will probably keep last place. It's up to the ping pong balls now.
Let's remember, Bedard isn't the only potential franchise player out there; and I'm too lazy to google it, but I'm sure there were many that were picked within the top 10 and especially the top 5. Toews was 3rd off the top of my head.There is no silver lining if they don’t land a franchise player
One thing to consider is that we have 2 1st round picks this year, next year, and the following year. This year's draft is very deep, which is a good point, but we have 6 bites at the 1st round apple over the next 3 drafts. Even if the unthinkable happens and Tampa Bay tanks out next season, worse case we have 2 1st rounder this year, 1 next year, and 3 in 2025.We all know the Blackhawks will pick 5th by now and pass on Benson and blow this.
I think top 3 is hard to mess up, but 4th or 5th could be alot easier to trick yourself glancing down the board due to Benson/Russian size issues.
1ABedard
1B Fantilli/Caarlson
4 Benson
5 Russian (2026 issue)
Thats how I rank em. Benson is very young and highly productive. The Rus and Caarlson have Pro experience.
I think Caarlson and Fantilli are sure things due to versatility, overall contributions and size, but the other 3 can score, and thats what our farm looks like it needs.
If we pick 5 and adventure off this mini-board of elites its for physical traits and character projecting development like Smith(strength/speed) etc.
But that means a Dach like risk scenario where you are passing on the Zegras type again.
Oddly the hawks lost 8 in a row 3 times this year. They would have lost 17 straight but somehow they beat the rangers on the road out of nowhere. Like you said that's a lot of games to not accidentally win one.imo, its about having a great Goalie....can't really think of a championship team without one....there may have been one......
i would love getting Bedard, but its about strong goalie, D-men and 2-way playing Centers who win face-offs, especially in your own zone at the beginning of a PK. I do find it odd that the Glucks lost their last 13 games of the season.... seems to me to lose 13 in a row in the NHL you would have to do it on purpose. The odds seem astronomical for 13 teams in a row having a good night and you having 13 bad ones in a row. idk...maybe its just my dislike for the Glucks.
Oddly the hawks lost 8 in a row 3 times this year. They would have lost 17 straight but somehow they beat the rangers on the road out of nowhere. Like you said that's a lot of games to not accidentally win one.
Well, I'm going to give my current thoughts right now on the draft;
Bedard
Carlsson
Fantilli
Michkov
Smith
Danielson
Reinbacher
If KD gets one of those guys I'm happy. I'd go so far as to say this draft has a big 5 with the things Smith is doing right now. It wouldn't shock me if Smith goes top three. Smith is destroying the U18 the same way Bedard destroyed the world's.
Reinbacher has blown up as of late and is head and shoulders the best defenseman prospect in this draft.
And please, stop sleeping on Michkov. He's on the same tier as Bedard and it wouldn't shock me if he went second. He won't, but I wouldn't be surprised if he did. Don't believe any of that Russian factor bullshit. The best Russian prospect since Ovechkin isn't going to be stuck in Russia, and when he gets here he will be polished.
2010 didn't have a great goalie.imo, its about having a great Goalie....can't really think of a championship team without one....there may have been one......
i would love getting Bedard, but its about strong goalie, D-men and 2-way playing Centers who win face-offs, especially in your own zone at the beginning of a PK. I do find it odd that the Glucks lost their last 13 games of the season.... seems to me to lose 13 in a row in the NHL you would have to do it on purpose. The odds seem astronomical for 13 teams in a row having a good night and you having 13 bad ones in a row. idk...maybe its just my dislike for the Glucks.
I agree with you for the most part, but to say Niemi was only good is an understatement and we will have to agree to disagree on that.... I'll say a notch below great.2010 didn't have a great goalie.
Niemi was good, not great. Huet was Meh. In fact: after 2010 some hockey "pundits" were claiming that the age of the great goalie was over. Come 2011 Tim Thomas posted the best goaltender year in hockey history and won Boston a cup.
I have said this elsewhere: I don't believe that there's is a specific gameplan to a cup. What you need is:
I think the major issue with the 'hawks was that they did have an excellent gameplan and buy-in from 2009-2015, but after that they lacked the critical mass of personnel playing above their cap hit, and as core members and depth players aged out and replacements came in, they were shoehorned into the same gameplan that won them the cup even though they couldn't play that gameplan effectively. That caused some buy-in issues. Since Bowman the Beancouter refused to deviate and adapt his gameplan from the cup-winning model and lacked the scouting ability (or just refused to listen to his scouts), he kept trying to fit square pegs into round holes instead of looking at the next gen.
- A game plan that fits the personnel you have
- Complete buy-in from every member of the team into said gameplan
- A critical mass of players playing at a level over their cap hit
- A lot of luck--there are 31 other teams out there with the same goal.
Assuming that the KD/LR regime lasts a few years, their gameplan looks to be a lot more chippy than our last regime--even the cup-winning regime. There does seem to be some buy-in as well. That bodes well--especicially if the current batch of prospects (i.e. Allan/Korch), and the ones we'll be acquiring over the next few seasons can fit in, or the gameplan can be tweaked a bit to accommodate their games. Plus, it does seem like KD/LR are more on the same page than Bowman/Q ever were, and LR did better with the tablescraps he got dealt than JC/King ever did. That does bode well.
Further, we do have some decent goalie prospects in the pool, so I think we're okay there as long as one develops right. If the D is excellent they don't have to be world-beating, they just have to be "good enough", like Niemi was.
2010 didn't have a great goalie.
Niemi was good, not great. Huet was Meh. In fact: after 2010 some hockey "pundits" were claiming that the age of the great goalie was over. Come 2011 Tim Thomas posted the best goaltender year in hockey history and won Boston a cup.
I have said this elsewhere: I don't believe that there's is a specific gameplan to a cup. What you need is:
I think the major issue with the 'hawks was that they did have an excellent gameplan and buy-in from 2009-2015, but after that they lacked the critical mass of personnel playing above their cap hit, and as core members and depth players aged out and replacements came in, they were shoehorned into the same gameplan that won them the cup even though they couldn't play that gameplan effectively. That caused some buy-in issues. Since Bowman the Beancouter refused to deviate and adapt his gameplan from the cup-winning model and lacked the scouting ability (or just refused to listen to his scouts), he kept trying to fit square pegs into round holes instead of looking at the next gen.
- A game plan that fits the personnel you have
- Complete buy-in from every member of the team into said gameplan
- A critical mass of players playing at a level over their cap hit
- A lot of luck--there are 31 other teams out there with the same goal.
Assuming that the KD/LR regime lasts a few years, their gameplan looks to be a lot more chippy than our last regime--even the cup-winning regime. There does seem to be some buy-in as well. That bodes well--especicially if the current batch of prospects (i.e. Allan/Korch), and the ones we'll be acquiring over the next few seasons can fit in, or the gameplan can be tweaked a bit to accommodate their games. Plus, it does seem like KD/LR are more on the same page than Bowman/Q ever were, and LR did better with the tablescraps he got dealt than JC/King ever did. That does bode well.
Further, we do have some decent goalie prospects in the pool, so I think we're okay there as long as one develops right. If the D is excellent they don't have to be world-beating, they just have to be "good enough", like Niemi was.
I agree with you for the most part, but to say Niemi was only good is an understatement and we will have to agree to disagree on that.... I'll say a notch below great.
Benson's skating is going to make him drop.We see things almost the same except on 17 year old Benson. I have the same belief in Michkov...but he has a knock for struggling at the pro level with his first team, and the eligibility and war issue.
I will listen to you and put Benson 5th.
But bottom line....is we really want to be picking 4th and not 5th to get into the sure thing franchise category in this draft.
Bedard
Caarlson/Fantilli (only 2 because they are sure things)
Michkov only 4 because of size/contract issues
There is alot more guess work after the top 4.
Lord this is a great post, however one thing that needs to be considered, the Hawks have not been very successful in the last few years at the draft, where as in 2002- Mike Smith was at the helm and he had a lot to do with the Hawks great picks and the success they endured, but all those picks dont amount to anything if Pat Kane and Toews aren’t drafted. This years pick is extremely important as it sets a precedent for the Hawks moving forward. With the amount of cap room and picks Hawks should not have to wait another 3 years to make there mark. 2025 draft should be used to build a stronger team, added pieces per say. Drafting a guy like Fantilli would be spectacular, the team needs its next young leader to take place, nothing again Benson(he will be a good player) but not on a team that is screaming for talent, I feel he would turn into a Kyle Calder or Bell or Arnason which didn’t amount to anything. If Michkov is there and the top 3 have been picked when it’s time for the Hawks to draft, I would take a swing at him even with all the issues surrounding him, because after him there is nothing saying that picks 5 and up are not just supplementary players for teams that already have some sort of talent unlike the Hawks who have zero.One thing to consider is that we have 2 1st round picks this year, next year, and the following year. This year's draft is very deep, which is a good point, but we have 6 bites at the 1st round apple over the next 3 drafts. Even if the unthinkable happens and Tampa Bay tanks out next season, worse case we have 2 1st rounder this year, 1 next year, and 3 in 2025.
We have options and we should use them over the next 3 seasons. I don't think out future 100% hinges on this draft--and especially the 1st pick we get. Remember, the previous core was build starting with the 2002 draft, and our first rounder was a swing-and-a-miss by picking up Babchuk. Our 2nd rounder was a grand slam in Duncan Keith, not to mention. in 2003 we hit homer in the 1st round (Seabrook), 2nd round (Crawford), and in round 8 (Buff). Further in 2004 we had a swing-and-a-miss in Cam Barker in the 1st round, but we got homers in the 2nd with Bolland and Bickell (both instrumental in the 2013 finals and Bolland as well in 2010). You could even add Brower into that draft as well.
I'm not glib enough to dismiss our 1st pick this summer as something we can mess up; we can't. KD has to do his due diligence on it. But, he also has to do his due diligence on the late 1st rounder we get from Tampa, as well as our 4 2nd round picks this year, not to mention next season and the following 2 years where we have 2 picks in each of the 1st three rounds.
Yeah got to agree on Niemi. That year, in those playoffs, Niemi was incredible. I mean, there's a reason why dipshit Wilson snatched him up after OS'ing Hammer. What he did against SJ alone that year was stellar. I remember how pissed I -- and a lot of Hawk fans -- were when we lost Niemi that off-season.I agree with you for the most part, but to say Niemi was only good is an understatement and we will have to agree to disagree on that.... I'll say a notch below great.