Blackhawks (29-20-7) @ Predators (32-18-6) - 02/14 - 7:00 PM

[Ton]

Looks like Q has flipped his lid with the line-up.

 

[Tater]

Looks like Q has flipped his lid with the line-up.

WTF?!?!?!?



Seabs paired with OD? Kruger as 2C over Bolland?



I know the lines/pairing won't even last through the first 10 minutes, but......

 

[Rex]

so Q has officially lost his mind.



is Morrison a scratch?? lol

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

Morrison and Frolik were scratched... Scott in at forward lmao! And he will certainly be in the lineup against the Rangers who are the most physical team in the league.

 

[Rex]

Brunette as the second line wing, Stalberg is third line.



O'Donnell-Seabrook





WOW!

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

Lol that's a nasty fourth line... Shaw-Mayers-Scott

 

[Rex]

too bad the first three lines is softer than a satin pillow.



The D pairs has me scratching my head though.

 

[supraman]

we lose. Those lines=no winning allowed. Good Bai Q good bai

 

[Rex]

we lose. Those lines=no winning allowed. Good Bai Q good bai

but it's not Q's fault!! It's Tallon!!

 

[klemmer]

Wow. Who made up that mess? Scooter? McD?

 

[MassHavoc]

I guess he really wants to go out guns a blazing and show how bad it can really get.



At least i agree with one line, here is where I go...



10-19-88

65-36-81

25-16-67

15-17-22 (I prefer 15-22-32 but I feel if those are the lines that Q won't play it with Scott there and then it becomes worthless)



2-7

8-20

34-6 (or 32)

 

[Rex]

what's wrong with 25-19-88? The three showed chemistry for a month, and to repay 25 for his work, he is demoted to the third line lol



is that Scooter telling Q that it's a contract year, and if he hits 20 goals, he will cost more?

 

[supraman]

what's wrong with 25-19-88? The three showed chemistry for a month, and to repay 25 for his work, he is demoted to the third line lol



is that Scooter telling Q that it's a contract year, and if he hits 20 goals, he will cost more?

It isn't 10-19-88

 

[MassHavoc]

If you aren't going to play Sharp at center. Then he needs to be no where other than the top line. Period. Obviosly people are going to feel otherwise.

 

[Rex]

It isn't 10-19-88

touche

 

[Rex]

If you aren't going to play Sharp at center. Then he needs to be no where other than the top line. Period. Obviosly people are going to feel otherwise.

sorry, I like spreading depth.

 

[supraman]

sorry, I like spreading depth.

We spread it plenty with STK



Let me introduce you to some of their fellow hawks Hossa and Bolland,Put those on the 2nd line and bam wealth spread. Hey McDick gimme a call I'll coach for you. Even tell you what you want to hear.

 

[MassHavoc]

sorry, I like spreading depth.

There is plenty of depth, I'm worried about chemistry. You still have Bolland and Hossa and whoever else you want on the 2nd for depth. And I like the 4th line, i have all year. As I've mentioned I'm a big fan of Mayers and what he's done on that line. So it may not be the greatest but it's a solid 4th. It's the third that I feel is the liability and well it is what it is. You can be about depth but that only plays into my other part of the equation, if he's not on the top he needs to be at Center. So it's not like I'm saying he only needs to be there. I think those are the two positions that would help this team the most. If you aren't going to fucking play bollie on the second then sharp needs to be the center there if he's not playing with Toews and Kane.

 

[Pez68]

Those lines.....

 

[R K]

How can I tell you to "go **** yourself" when you post gems like that. LOL!