Blackhawks to rely on Kane to be #2 Center

Status
Not open for further replies.

DMelt36

Bolland > You
Joined:
May 27, 2010
Posts:
13,969
Liked Posts:
8,434
Not happening, especially with his cap hit

This.

I'd like to see more out of him in the postseason, but there are a ton of Hawks players in that boat right now.

My God, if he could ever find hands that could catch up with his feet, he'd be electric on offense. But that's been said about him for a long time.
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
This.

I'd like to see more out of him in the postseason, but there are a ton of Hawks players in that boat right now.

My God, if he could ever find hands that could catch up with his feet, he'd be electric on offense. But that's been said about him for a long time.

we have been saying that for 2 years now. lol

20 goal scorers at under a million dollars is not someone you trade...

if he demands a large payout next summer when his contract is up, then you let him go
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
if it helps bring in a #1 goalie or a big badass defenseman, you absolutely do.

exactly.

people are saying just to ditch him, but unless you get an immediate upgrade, you dont move him

if someone offers a defenseman or goalie that would help us immediately, you throw stalberg in that deal


i was talking more about just dumping him for a lateral type player or picks
 

Everyday I'm Byfuglien

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Oct 8, 2010
Posts:
3,194
Liked Posts:
1,463
oh I didn't know people wanted him gone just to have him gone. I assumed it was a "trade him while his value is high" thing.
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
oh I didn't know people wanted him gone just to have him gone. I assumed it was a "trade him while his value is high" thing.

but what were people expecting for him when they said that?


Trade stalberg if we can improve at a position
 

HawkWriter

New member
Joined:
Aug 18, 2011
Posts:
3,491
Liked Posts:
1,341
Stalberg is the perfect person to potentially trade at the trade deadline for a super star. He is exactly the type of player a team with a superstar would want to get back in the deal (along with other pieces).

Trading him in the offseason wouldn't bring nearly as much as trading him at the deadline.

If we are talking about trading him of course, trading for the sake of trading isn't smart especially with his cap hit and what he brings for it.
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
Stalberg is the perfect person to potentially trade at the trade deadline for a super star. He is exactly the type of player a team with a superstar would want to get back in the deal (along with other pieces).

Trading him in the offseason wouldn't bring nearly as much as trading him at the deadline.

If we are talking about trading him of course, trading for the sake of trading isn't smart especially with his cap hit and what he brings for it.

thats all im saying
 

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
Stalberg is the perfect person to potentially trade at the trade deadline for a super star. He is exactly the type of player a team with a superstar would want to get back in the deal (along with other pieces).

Trading him in the offseason wouldn't bring nearly as much as trading him at the deadline.

If we are talking about trading him of course, trading for the sake of trading isn't smart especially with his cap hit and what he brings for it.

we are all on the same page

i love you all.



especially icehog

Homers united :troll:
 

DMelt36

Bolland > You
Joined:
May 27, 2010
Posts:
13,969
Liked Posts:
8,434
Stalberg is the perfect person to potentially trade at the trade deadline for a super star. He is exactly the type of player a team with a superstar would want to get back in the deal (along with other pieces).

Trading him in the offseason wouldn't bring nearly as much as trading him at the deadline.

If we are talking about trading him of course, trading for the sake of trading isn't smart especially with his cap hit and what he brings for it.

:clap:

Never believed a trade just for the sake of a trade has EVER been a good idea.
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
Trading just to trade is dumb, unless it is Marlon Byrd.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
this notion that teams "trade to just trade" is more or less something the fans came up with, most teams that make a trade that is questionable in all of pro sports is about change, shaking things up. GMs dont trade just so they make a trade.
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
this notion that teams "trade to just trade" is more or less something the fans came up with, most teams that make a trade that is questionable in all of pro sports is about change, shaking things up. GMs dont trade just so they make a trade.
What is the difference in making a trade to make a trade and making a trade to shake things up?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top