Can this Autocracy have a Democratic element?

[MikeDitkaPolishSausage]

yeah, ban people for posting opinions on a opinion forum.

your parents donated a ton of stupid to you

Did you make a poo poo in your diaper again? Click your life alert button so someone can help you out.

 

[Bearly]

What a dicksmoking asshole. Advocating the banning of all you dont like Are you 11 years old? Hope you arent responsible for raising children

1-6 denier prefers fascism over the will of the people. With that sig, I can understand the trepidation.

 

[Bearly]

Dumb ideal. But it would be the democratic thing to do. Ban opposing opinions.

It takes more than a majority. It takes and outright win. We all know given opinions (unless you're bad at math or logic) would not come into play in this format. It would always take a dicklicker, troll, or devout contrarian to win this vote. Maybe a guy that negs out of spite instead of content. Only special could win. Good participation would even prevent faction directed bans. You gotta vote to be heard.

 

[Bearly]

Do you have pictures of Unicorns and Rainbows in your room?

Says the guy obsessed with a Bears board. Do you have pictures of Fields and Mooney in your room? I think there's a Lions board somewhere.

Been sleeping off Covid and was curious if it got moved or deleted? Didn't even post in that thread. Didn't see it so though I'd throw up something that wasn't a call out or member specific.

I doubt this takes effect but maybe we can have least desirable votes without consequence periodically, just like we have best poster ones.

 

[Bearly]

Speaking of ban vote....

That cuckold "Aaronitout" bet me that Jordan Love would outperform Fields this year. Since that clearly won't happen, is he banned for a year?

Premature. Something could happen to both of the starters. Obvious results are never obvious on Football.

 

[dabears70]

It takes more than a majority. It takes and outright win. We all know given opinions (unless you're bad at math or logic) would not come into play in this format . It would always take a dicklicker, troll, or devout contrarian to win this vote. Maybe a guy that negs out of spite instead of content. Good participation would even prevent faction directed bans. You gotta vote to be heard.

So you would agree to vote to ban @Anytime23, @Chicagosports89, @MDB111™, @MikeDitkaPolishSausage, @JesusHalasChrist, @ThatGuyRyan? Because i can show you many many posts that they disliked out of spite instead of content. I can show you thousands just from @Anytime23 and @Chicagosports89.

Let me know

 

[MikeDitkaPolishSausage]

So you would agree to vote to ban @Anytime23, @Chicagosports89, @MDB111™, @MikeDitkaPolishSausage, @JesusHalasChrist, @ThatGuyRyan? Because i can show you many many posts that they disliked out of spite instead of content. I can show you thousands just from @Anytime23 and @Chicagosports89.

Let me know

I dislike posts because I don’t like the content. Specifically the CCS written articles posted here because they are copying information from other writers or posters on here. But I guess I’m happy to be living in your head rent free as you would say.

 

[Bearly]

Again, you'd have to piss off A LOT of people to be the one person banned for a month. It takes more than a general dislike by most here to champion this. Bunch of complaining usual suspects are clearly not actuaries.

 

[Bearly]

So you would agree to vote to ban @Anytime23, @Chicagosports89, @MDB111™, @MikeDitkaPolishSausage, @JesusHalasChrist, @ThatGuyRyan? Because i can show you many many posts that they disliked out of spite instead of content. I can show you thousands just from @Anytime23 and @Chicagosports89.

Let me know

Please keep members names out of this thread. Yes, I know that you're not the 1st but that was by far the most problematic and likely to get my thread tossed. Had to dislike it.

 

[Anytime23]

So you would agree to vote to ban @Anytime23, @Chicagosports89, @MDB111™, @MikeDitkaPolishSausage, @JesusHalasChrist, @ThatGuyRyan? Because i can show you many many posts that they disliked out of spite instead of content. I can show you thousands just from @Anytime23 and @Chicagosports89.

Let me know

I couldn't imagine being elderly and crying over n3gs, holy shit. Dude, over time you've n3gged me thousands and thousands of times and i never whined about it. The first time i counter-n3gged you, you went batshit insane and now more and more people want in on the fun of ruining your day after seeing how crazy this makes you.

You have a serious personality disorder. You're a shitty poster with even worse sports opinions and you've always pointed the finger at everyone else, calling them homos and saying they're obsessed with you. You're legitimately fucked up in the head. Seek help before you kill yourself over this place.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1550950916727111682

 

[Omeletpants]

1-6 denier prefers fascism over the will of the people. With that sig, I can understand the trepidation.

watch out you will get banned for discussing politics in this forum

 

[BearFanJohn]

yeah, ban people for posting opinions on a opinion forum.

your parents donated a ton of stupid to you

I thought you have been banned for racist stuff? I really only notice when you don’t post much. I just assume you pulled another double shift at Arby’s.

 

[JesusHalasChrist]

2 of the 3 people i'd vote for have posted in this thread. The other may have been assassinated by Ray Epps.

 

[PrideisBears]

This board needs more cankle threads.

Also needs a function to tell who people were before they changed their names. Too many name changes around here.

Agreed

 

[Bearly]

watch out you will get banned for discussing politics in this forum

More a reflection of a grasp on reality.

 

[dabears70]

Please keep members names out of this thread. Yes, I know that you're not the 1st but that was by far the most problematic and likely to get my thread tossed. Had to dislike it.

And yet you for some odd reason didn't answer the question, but it's alright because that just tells your answer for you which was already predicted.

Thanks.

 

[Bearly]

And yet you for some odd reason didn't answer the question, but it's alright because that just tells your answer for you which was already predicted.

Thanks.

Been answered a few times. 1 a month by majority consensus doesn't work for your question, pee pants. Thanks for the dislike. Better company.

 

[ZOMBIE@CTESPN]

Been answered a few times. 1 a month by majority consensus doesn't work for your question, pee pants.

His preferred pronoun is dongbears

 

[Bearly]

His preferred pronoun is dongbears

True but he's being childish again. Can't seem to hold it back.

 

[bufordht]

The problem with this line of thought is that all these kids want is attention because, I don't know, their moms didn't breastfeed them or something. So it would just become a competition to see who can be the most annoying and get banned. Then they would just grab their alt and post for the next month. It's kind of just giving him what they want.