- Joined:
- May 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 48,308
- Liked Posts:
- 26,825
Jesus... really? Wasting Carcillo's time with a hearing for that "hit"?
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=598000
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=598000
Jesus... really? Wasting Carcillo's time with a hearing for that "hit"?
http://www.nhl.com/i...s.htm?id=598000
Is there any video of this? I do not remember it from the game.
Oh give me a break... Carcillo bumped into him... Ovechkin SHOVED Campbell.
They wouldn't call a hearing for this unless he is being suspended.
Why? Because there was no misconduct or penalty called on the play, which means it had no purpose of being reviewed unless they were to suspend him at their discretion.
They wouldn't call a hearing for this unless he is being suspended.
Why? Because there was no misconduct or penalty called on the play, which means it had no purpose of being reviewed unless they were to suspend him at their discretion.
Not necessarily. League said it would review all questionable hits, penalty given at the time or not. He could just be fined. As a couple have already had happen.