- Joined:
- May 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,024
- Liked Posts:
- 0
He's back.
Is
yet?
Is
He has no history for wreckless play as far as suspensions, warnings or any other rulings. If you'd like to make shit up fee free. His penalty minutes did not result in supliment discipline for wreckless behavior on the ice. You can type as many long winded paragraphs as you like it still won't change the facts.
For the example of Ovechkin's verses Carcillo's, Ovechkin had discipline 2-3 times PRIOR to Campbells hit, which were the direct result of wreckless behavior on the ice. He was given 2 games for that instance and was fined the previous time. Which is what should have happened to Carcillo.
Pay fucking attention. He has no history in the aspect they suspended him for. If you "chose" to use other criteria you are doing something they have said they wouldn't, but did.
Round and round we fucking go. Should have been a fine as a FIRST FUCKING OFFENSE!!!
He has no history for reckless hits on the ice? Hmmm....I think I remember seeing him actually take a player out before by accident. Now just where could I have seen him just bowl someone over...let me think...
Where....
http://www.youtube.c...1&v=hQc1_V3M4G4
Maybe Burish could tell me about it? Maybe at the :13 mark of this video?
Yep..your right...wasn't even called for a penalty
But, if no penalty was called, then nothing was done illegal, correct?
I am sooooo confused.
But, if no penalty was called, then nothing was done illegal, correct?
I am sooooo confused.
I hope he stays far away from any wreckless play. His play on the ice gives this team an edge without the crap they are trying to rid the game of.
I hope he stays far away from any wreckless play. His play on the ice gives this team an edge without the crap they are trying to rid the game of.
One thing for sure, the other teams have had their heads on swivels and aren't taken liberties with the Hawks like they did the past few years.