Casey Anthony Trial (merged)

[R K]

Welcome to the ignore list along with your buddy Stu.

Stu will at least grow on you. He's not that bad just over the top sometimes.



The other, well, ya know.



We are just getting old.

 

[winos5]

No doubt she is in some way at the very least partially and more likely directly responsible for the little girls death. I do believe the Grand parents are complicite as well, but to what degree I don't know.



I do know;



The cops bungled the investigation. Apparently some one didn't want to get muddy shoes? There goes any DNA evidene linking her directly to the body.



The prosecuter was swinging for the fences but wiffed. No way he was going to get Murder one without 1)Murder weapon 2) DNA evidence linking perp to the body. 3) Plausible motive. I think the defense explanation floated in the opening statements is probably not far from the truth, and diffused any element for motive they might have had. They should have went after lesser charges and sent her away for awhile.



I think;



The defense called several witneeses I think were very effective regarding the autopsy results and the meter reader in particular.



I also think Grandpas suicide attempt had more to do with complicity than just grief.



I think the jury reached the correct verdict.



I think Mom will at some point get her do. Kharma/fate is a cruel *****.

 

[CaveMan]

I am disgusted at the death and as far as the evidence was presented the right call was made ( I think I just threw up in my mouth). Justice will be between herself and whoever she prays to

 

[jakobeast]

If they wanted to nail her, maybe they should have tried murder 1, then when that blows up, they would have known where they fucked up and gone with a lesser manslaughter charge.

 

[Tater]

At this point, they should probably just set Drew Peterson free.

Why waste money on that trial? Isn't the evidence just as circumstantial?

 

[Tater]

Stu will at least grow on you. He's not that bad just over the top sometimes.



The other, well, ya know.



We are just getting old.

Yeah, like a yeast infection.

 

[klemmer]

My thoughts exactly, Tater.

 

[R K]

My thoughts exactly, Tater.

Get some Monostat 7. It'll clear that shit right up. Either that or bake a loaf of bread!

 

[Kerfuffle]

Wow. Your stupidity extends beyond hockey.

As a father of girls yourself I find your remarks surprising and disgusting. A little girl was murdered and you seem to think it's no big deal.

 

[Kerfuffle]

Circumstantial is the same, no facts just pure speculation and twisting of that speculation into "fact".



But would you feel the same about the result if it was you in place of Casey

No it's not. Hearsay is something you testify to that you heard someone else say. We all the 'telephone game' and how the message someone hears is not the same as the one they tell. Circumstantial means there are facts but no smoking gun. I think if I was Casey I would feel relieved that I got away with murder.

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

As a father of girls yourself I find your remarks surprising and disgusting. A little girl was murdered and you seem to think it's no big deal.

Haven't read the thread but saw this post and have to respond. As a fellow over the top goer every once in awhile... I highly doubt he thinks its "no big deal that a little girl was murdered" that's just an idiotic statement.



Mmmmmmm yeast.

 

[BlackHawkPaul]

As a father of girls yourself I find your remarks surprising and disgusting. A little girl was murdered and you seem to think it's no big deal.

So, parents must automatically convict due to the fact that they have offspring? Nowhere in what I have seen in Klem's (here and other places on the net) posts has he discarded the young girl's death.

Out of the 12 jurors-- I wonder how many had children. By your reasoning, they should all say "guilty" if they're parents-- if not their whole status as a parent should come into question.

I don't know how many different ways some one can tell you that the justice system is different than mob mentality.

 

[klemmer]

As a father of girls yourself I find your remarks surprising and disgusting. A little girl was murdered and you seem to think it's no big deal.

Guilt trips don't work on me.



Apparently, you missed this post.



There are two tragedies in the " Case of the Week"



1. A little girl is dead.

2. The media is going to prostitute her out in the name of ratings.



As citizens, we deserve better. As a society, we fail to demand it for the most part.





Please schedule your optalanalogy ASAP.

 

[Kerfuffle]

Kerfluffle, how the hell do you know the grandmother didnt do the searches? Because the day the searches were written to the hard drive the grandmother was shown as being at work that day. If you followed this from the beginning you would know the grandparents are pretty sleazy and trying to protect their daughter. This was a case of a mother protecting her daughter. How do you know the grandmother didnt kill the kid? Well if that happened then why didn't Casey contact the police? What mother waits a month to report this and goes out and parties during that time. How do you explain that? This is the whole damn point. Please point me to the evidence that beyond a shadow of a doubt says that.....You cant because there isn't any. You're stretching here. The pool drowning theory or grandma killing the kid has no more merit than if they claimed that aliens abducted her and killed the kid. As the prosecutor said, don't let common sense go out the window here. Unfortunately for some of you I'm afraid it did.



You just don't "think" that must be the case, therefore it must be so. You better hope if you or a family member never ends up on trial for a crime they didn't commit and a group of people like you on a jury. You are making the assumption she is innocent. You would be the kind of juror that could never convict anyone unless you had a smoking gun - i.e. a videotape of the mother killing the kid. But even in that case the defense could say the photo was doctored and you may buy into a conspiracy theory. See where I'm going? At what point, if any, would you ever convict in this case?





You are no better than the people that were all screaming for the duke Lacrosse players heads..You couldn't be more wrong about that. From the beginning of that one I felt those guys were innocent. And it turns out they were. The 'victim' in that case had severe credibility issues. (also she's now pending trial for murdering her boyfriend but that's a separate case)











of course he wouldn't. Its easy to be all fire and brimstone, convicting people because your "pretty sure" they did it and locking up or killing innocent people is ok as long as you get all the bad ones (but generally, that basically means the real perp gets away so you still dont get all the bad guys). Again you are saying she is innocent. My, my, my....



That's all well and good until it affects you.





Heres an example. Basically if my ex girlfriend got murdered and dumped somewhere on any given weekday night, im pretty damn sure a prosecutor could make a pretty enticing circumstantial case against me.

answers in blue

 

[Kerfuffle]

So, parents must automatically convict due to the fact that they have offspring? Nowhere in what I have seen in Klem's (here and other places on the net) posts has he discarded the young girl's death.

Out of the 12 jurors-- I wonder how many had children. By your reasoning, they should all say "guilty" if they're parents-- if not their whole status as a parent should come into question.

I don't know how many different ways some one can tell you that the justice system is different than mob mentality.

No, what I found disgusting is that as a parent he does not understand the anger of another parent and the loss of this beautiful little girl. To call me stupid because I said that Casey will have to deal with her own little prison in the real world now showed that he feels differently and that he feels she should not have to deal with that. And that I find shameful.

 

[R K]

everyone is upset over the loss of a child. Any child. Doesn't mean without proof anyone is willing to take another life.



Holy ****.

 

[BlackHawkPaul]

everyone is upset over the loss of a child. Any child. Doesn't mean without proof anyone is willing to take another life.



Holy ****.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pP4P-VgcM4s



Unless you're Macauly Culkin in The Good Son.

That film fed my liberal bias and made me hate children.

 

[klemmer]

No, think it's stupid that you are hanging the mother based on the propaganda you have received from whatever media source you choose unless you sat in the jury box or attended every minute of the trial.



What I don't understand is the mob mentality fueled by the media in its never ending quest for ratings and I refuse to participate in it.



I think it's a matter between the family and whoever they pray to, whether it be God, a Cow, or Jako. No one else.

 

[klemmer]

everyone is upset over the loss of a child. Any child. Doesn't mean without proof anyone is willing to take another life.



Holy ****.

Some people just don't understand that simple concept.

 

[R K]

Some people just don't understand that simple concept.

The pure ingorance of many just floors me. No wonder this country is in the state it is. Nice to know we have Nancy Grace contributing to IHN though.