- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 16,062
- Liked Posts:
- 13,668
No one is taking your bait and clicking on that link. Piss the fuck off.
No one is taking your bait and clicking on that link. Piss the fuck off.
elbandido
Active member
- Joined:
- Dec 23, 2019
- Posts:
- 302
- Liked Posts:
- 100
My favorite teams
And again, welcome to la-la land...
- Joined:
- Dec 9, 2013
- Posts:
- 13,103
- Liked Posts:
- 4,275
#AnyoneButTrubisky
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 29,518
- Liked Posts:
- 24,051
- Location:
- USA
that's fine too...goodbye roquan
- Joined:
- Aug 29, 2012
- Posts:
- 4,291
- Liked Posts:
- 2,597
- Location:
- Fort Myers, FL
This "article" is so really dumb that I hate to even bump this thread, since it's just more offseason clickbait fodder and the only media coverage outside of McCaskey death lately.
Sure, RW is better than any QB Bears have currently. Should they blow the future equity AND cap to get him vs. other options and lose other good players to do it? hell no. Esp. until OL is fixed in a major f'in way. Bring in OL early & often next draft & FA once Massie & Leno's contracts are dumpable if they don't pull a complete 180 from "shit to shinola" (as my old school HS coach used to say).
Sure, RW is better than any QB Bears have currently. Should they blow the future equity AND cap to get him vs. other options and lose other good players to do it? hell no. Esp. until OL is fixed in a major f'in way. Bring in OL early & often next draft & FA once Massie & Leno's contracts are dumpable if they don't pull a complete 180 from "shit to shinola" (as my old school HS coach used to say).
anotheridiot
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jul 15, 2016
- Posts:
- 5,935
- Liked Posts:
- 791
not sure mitch has to beat out Foles. Foles is best as the backup, watch what goes wrong and be able to change it. He was not setting the world on fire as a franchise quarterback in Jacksonville.well Wilson is 31 and Rogers is 36. I'm good with either. But No to Stafford ? Hopefully Mitch can raise his game and beat out Foles
- Joined:
- Jun 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 45,402
- Liked Posts:
- 34,635
My favorite teams
Sure it's not going to happen, but please do give the clicks.
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 59,836
- Liked Posts:
- 38,463
And this would be a problem why? Roquan is not elite and likely never will be.
- Joined:
- Aug 22, 2012
- Posts:
- 10,561
- Liked Posts:
- 6,879
- Location:
- Indiana
Oh, I don’t know about that, let’s see what this brings.
Payton!34
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Apr 18, 2013
- Posts:
- 2,525
- Liked Posts:
- 1,303
We need to draft our own great qb, oh wait, haven’t been able to do that EVER!
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 59,836
- Liked Posts:
- 38,463
Sure I could be proven wrong but I doubt it. Time will tell.
- Joined:
- Aug 10, 2013
- Posts:
- 36,473
- Liked Posts:
- 33,418
- Location:
- Cumming
Toast88
Well-known member
- Joined:
- May 10, 2014
- Posts:
- 13,277
- Liked Posts:
- 13,064
Big difference between a "trade rumor" and "Here's what we speculatively think the Bears could give up for Wilson."
circusboy666
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Nov 10, 2013
- Posts:
- 1,076
- Liked Posts:
- 685
Peter King just said on ProFootball Talk with Mike Florio that Mack and 3 1’s would get it done. He throws shit on every wall though.
legendxofxlink
Whistle Dixie
- Joined:
- Apr 25, 2014
- Posts:
- 10,761
- Liked Posts:
- 10,854
- Location:
- Tennessee
My favorite teams
- Joined:
- Aug 10, 2013
- Posts:
- 36,473
- Liked Posts:
- 33,418
- Location:
- Cumming
Seattle would definitely want Mack. They have literally no pass rush for the last couple of years. The trade for Dunlap helped but it wasn't enough.
circusboy666
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Nov 10, 2013
- Posts:
- 1,076
- Liked Posts:
- 685
I’d give 3 1’s and ANY defensive player they want.
- Joined:
- Aug 10, 2013
- Posts:
- 36,473
- Liked Posts:
- 33,418
- Location:
- Cumming
Wonder who they can get on the market to replace Mack. Watt is wanting too much.
DB012031
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jan 15, 2019
- Posts:
- 727
- Liked Posts:
- 722
So I am torn on Russ when we throw out 1st Round Picks. We look at 1st round picks and freak out but the flip of that argument is that IF we added Russ, over the next three years, we are probably a playoff contender and would always be drafting where we are today or even further down (so 20th pick or later). Once you get to those later 1st rounders, the "value" isn't as great.
What I would consider, if I were the Bears is if they want the 1st rounders, we exclude this years pick because we desperately need to build the O-line back up. would they go for 22, 23, 24 1st rounders and a player or two. This way they get what they want and actually that 24 first rounder could be a solid pick if Russ falls off a cliff but also allows us to set up for future success.
What I would consider, if I were the Bears is if they want the 1st rounders, we exclude this years pick because we desperately need to build the O-line back up. would they go for 22, 23, 24 1st rounders and a player or two. This way they get what they want and actually that 24 first rounder could be a solid pick if Russ falls off a cliff but also allows us to set up for future success.
circusboy666
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Nov 10, 2013
- Posts:
- 1,076
- Liked Posts:
- 685
