- Joined:
- Nov 29, 2014
- Posts:
- 15,641
- Liked Posts:
- 18,567
- Location:
- Texas
Arlington Heights Hilbillys? @Montucky
Allegiant Stadium does not have a "retractable roof." It has a translucent roof, meaning allows light in.bears hired the same architects that designed Allegiant Stadium. It was completed in 3 years. Retractable roof and duo field types. This is the standard these guys are capable of.
WOW!
Completed in 3 years? Heck I have seen plenty of highways that have been under construction for longer than that (I'm looking at you I-35 through Waco, TX).hopefully you won't be crippled due to old age and are able to witness this event live when the new gig opens up in 2026.
bears hired the same architects that designed Allegiant Stadium. It was completed in 3 years. Retractable roof and duo field types. This is the standard these guys are capable of.
WOW!
So ... it is your belief that the Bears, basically owners of the Arlington Heights site, is going to build a stadium for an expansion team so that there is competition for future fans in Chicago?Chicago rumored as ideal big city for 1 of 8 NFL expansion teams | CHICITYSPORTS - Chicago Sports Blog - News - Forum - Rumors - Fans
Chicago has been home to two NFL teams at the same time, but not since 1959. Could the Bears be getting a new "little brother" team with NFL expansion in the future?www.chicitysports.com
what do you think of the Bears getting a new little brother on the Arlington Heights campus?
The NFL does not mind slowly adding teams, two at a time, so the impact would not be as great as adding 8 teams at once. Yes, there will be two divisions with one extra team. It has happened before.Sorry, I didn’t read the article. You may have addressed this. How many teams would the NFL have to bring in at a minimum? 8 if they just wanted to add 2 new divisions or more than likely just a new team per division? Otherwise say goodbye to the existing divisions.
I’m not sure they’re capable of making that leap without grossly tainting the talent pool and quality of the existing product (for a few years minimum). That’s a big financial gamble in my opinion.
So ... it is your belief that the Bears, basically owners of the Arlington Heights site, is going to build a stadium for an expansion team so that there is competition for future fans in Chicago?
Imagine an expansion team with a state-of-the-art stadium competing with the Bears in their The-Love-Boat (not space ship) tiny stadium. Seeing how many current fans are fickle, many of them will just become fans of The Bezo Bozos because of the better stadium experience. After all, the difference between a last place team and a bottom 10 team is not that much. Most young people do not care about team history.
It’s my belief that the Bears owners are that cheap that they’d defer costs of the building project if they could.So ... it is your belief that the Bears, basically owners of the Arlington Heights site, is going to build a stadium for an expansion team so that there is competition for future fans in Chicago?
Imagine an expansion team with a state-of-the-art stadium competing with the Bears in their The-Love-Boat (not space ship) tiny stadium. Seeing how many current fans are fickle, many of them will just become fans of The Bezo Bozos because of the better stadium experience. After all, the difference between a last place team and a bottom 10 team is not that much. Most young people do not care about team history.
The way you said it made it seem that you expected the Bears would stay in Soldier Field and would build a stadium for an expansion team in Arlington Heights.It’s my belief that the Bears owners are that cheap that they’d defer costs of the building project if they could.
The Founding Fathers generation, that being the generation that never lived with any rights that the founding fathers didn't also enjoy, beyond being allowed to have weapons of mass destruction.Which next generation is this?
IIRC you're probably not much older than me even though you look a LOT older than me (and larger, etc) hell you might even be younger than me, so are you referring to millenials or zoomers or a generation after that???
That would be fun, but chances are that those games would happen infrequently because of them being in differentI'll support any and all pro-football teams in Chicago. Id love to see the cross-town meatballs meltdown over every loss to the other team.
I don’t disagree with you. But the owners would have to be intelligent.The way you said it made it seem that you expected the Bears would stay in Soldier Field and would build a stadium for an expansion team in Arlington Heights.
Someone needs to tell the McCaskeys that building a state-of-the art stadium probably instantly doubles the value of the stadium. So building a new stadium is not being cheap. It is being intelligent.
Yes, but Arlington Heights is much smaller than Chicago. It could not afford dumping so much tax money on the citizens of the city.I don’t disagree with you. But the owners would have to be intelligent.
Also, a lot of owners like deferring costs of building to the city. The city gets tax revenue, the team gets a building for cheap.
Who Really Has to Pay for New NFL Stadiums?
NFL stadiums are some of the biggest and best venues for sports. But at the end of the day, who winds up paying for them?www.sportscasting.com
Are they too busy building a wall to work on a highway? Green textCompleted in 3 years? Heck I have seen plenty of highways that have been under construction for longer than that (I'm looking at you I-35 through Waco, TX).
Who cares?George Halas is rolling over in his grave.
Not buying it. How many fans support both the Cubs and White Sox? Virtually none. Think the same would happen with football. I can positively say no one supported both the Raiders and Niners.If it were an AFC team, and it most likely would be, it would be pretty easy to support both. I guess once every 4 years or so you'd have to pick a side. And then in the Superbowl if that ever happened in the next 1,000 years.
I guess that's fair...but the whole Cubs / Sox thing has a whole generational and historic thing to it. I'm not sure if that would be the outcome for a brand new franchise. On the flip side, I could definitely see a lot of Chicagoans never supporting another franchise though. Probably only the people who call the Sears Tower, Willis Tower.Not buying it. How many fans support both the Cubs and White Sox? Virtually none. Think the same would happen with football. I can positively say no one supported both the Raiders and Niners.
I guess that I am one of the few.Not buying it. How many fans support both the Cubs and White Sox? Virtually none. Think the same would happen with football. I can positively say no one supported both the Raiders and Niners.
I guess that's fair...but the whole Cubs / Sox thing has a whole generational and historic thing to it. I'm not sure if that would be the outcome for a brand new franchise. On the flip side, I could definitely see a lot of Chicagoans never supporting another franchise though. Probably only the people who call the Sears Tower, Willis Tower.