Rustysurf83
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Dec 22, 2010
- Posts:
- 1,065
- Liked Posts:
- 536
- Location:
- PNW
x.com
x.com
x.com
- Joined:
- May 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 17,759
- Liked Posts:
- 2,513
That is absolutely insane if even remotely true. And I say that in that I don't mistrust Holmes but the insanity I just have to pause on till confirmed.x.com
- Joined:
- May 31, 2010
- Posts:
- 6,802
- Liked Posts:
- 3,993
Even if I only got it for the Hawks season it's more than a year of ESPN+ and a VPN.
- Joined:
- May 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 17,759
- Liked Posts:
- 2,513
That's absolutely the way to go. The economics of those numbers don't work out because they want to milk fans for the price over the year when we'd unsubscribe for off months. 300 for the year is 8.33 a month per team. So they are hard hedging toward yearly subs. It's ridiculous. Anyone who doesn't want all theee teams are going to be taken up the ass.
LordKOTL
Scratched for Vorobiev
- Joined:
- Dec 8, 2014
- Posts:
- 8,657
- Liked Posts:
- 3,028
- Location:
- PacNW
My favorite teams
And they, and a lot of other networks and providers, wonder why piracy is on the rise.
Thankfully here the only blackout I get is for the Kraken because they are carried by Root sports which is part of the cable/satellite/streaming packages. But even so you'd think they would learn and realize that they stand to make money if fans can see the games and pull in advertising revenue, as opposed to blacking the game out and having piracy happen, which garners them no revenue.