brett05
867-5309
- Joined:
- Apr 28, 2009
- Posts:
- 27,226
- Liked Posts:
- 4,579
- Location:
- Hell
I hope not.
Two teams sharing a field would be a disaster on the grounds (grass).
I think you have to ultimately look at the finances. The Cubs spending a year or two at the Cell would give the Sox money, but in the grand scheme of things, the Cubs are the White Sox biggest competitor for money in the summer. If the Sox are the only baseball team in town, that will draw in a lot of people.
Reinsdorf also has the final say, and he has said he won't allow the Cubs to play there because the Cubs wouldn't let the Sox play at Wrigley while they were building the New Comiskey.
1). Baseball does not play havoc like football does
2). There was never a need for Wrigley