They have added a 37 year old and a 35 year old. You are playing with father time and he always wins. Also, you trade Castro for a guy who is 28 and never went past 131 innings.
Yeah, it's too bad that Zobrist is the only possible guy who can now play 2nd.
We know Father Time wins. Thus the two year commitment to Lackey vs. 6 or 7 to get other pitchers.
I am not saying Lackey is my favorite move or that I hoped that's all they'd do in FA. But it's pretty low risk. And doesn't tie up $ long-term.
Yeah, Zobrist is no spring chicken. And, like lackey, I wasn't praying that we'd sign him. I actually thought we had less need for him than many other teams. But he brings what we are missing. Smart, experienced player. I would have liked to spend the $ on a P or Heyward, but Heyward may get $25 per.
Bottom line is, the Cubs see it as I do. As i have said, Castro makes the plays that kill you. Zobrist brings smarts and OBP. And flexibility - something we already had a lot of, but not something Castro, specifically gave you. (OF possibility, that is).
The wild card here is Warren. I may be overvaluing him, thinking he's a starter with a 3.29 ERA. Most of his appearances were out of the pen, and nobody talks about him like he's Jose Fernandez. But I wouldn't be shocked to see him become a good starter.
The Cubs kept prospects they see as having higher ceilings: Baez and Soler. (Though the team may keep dealing) Castro's ceiling was last Sept. He was great for 7 weeks. But Theo didn't let that fool him.
I wish Starlin well. I hope he keeps piling up the hits. He can accumulate a hell of a lot of them eventually. But he is not a guy this team will miss in 2016.
There is a reason that several teams wanted Zobrist at age 35, and not many cared about Castro.
In other talks, teams were after Baez. These GM's know what they are doing.