Defiant Plan Not-Getters Refuse to Give Up the Ghost

knoxville7

I have the stride of a gazelle
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Jul 12, 2013
Posts:
20,222
Liked Posts:
14,142
Location:
The sewers
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Tennessee Volunteers
Most wins is not best team, especially in the NL with 6 teams being historically bad teams

6 historically bad teams?? I wouldn't go that far. maybe 1 or 2. to be historically bad youre talking like 42 wins...there wont be 6 teams that low in win totals. so really youre talking a pretty normal league outside of 1 or 2 teams IMO :shrug:
 

DanTown

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2009
Posts:
2,446
Liked Posts:
509
I have no issue saying the Cubs will win the most games, wint he NL, win the WS. Saying it is undisputed is that part that is in question.

It was not mentioned that it's undisputed that the Cubs will win the WS, it was said that it was undisputed that the Cubs have the best roster in baseball and to be quite honest, they do. Maybe you can find teams with say a better top 3 of the rotation or a better 3-4-5 hitters or a better backend of the bullpen but in the aggregate, you simply do not see a team that has as many quality depth players as the Cubs do this year.

There were 38 hitters last year who were 4+ WAR players, the Cubs have four players projected to do that (Russell, Bryant, Rizzo, Heyward) and then another (Schwarber) who might get there if he gets the PA.

There were 19 pitchers last year who were 4+ WAR players and the Cubs project to have two of them (Lester, Arrieta).

When you think of elite teams, they're usually as good as their bad players. The worst hitter in the Cubs regular lineup is either Miguel Montero, Jorge Soler, or Addison Russell. Their worst starting pitcher is either Kyle Hendricks or Jason Hammel. Besides the elite players they have at numerous positions, they also don't have glaring holes at the other spots. Javier Baez probably starts on 25 other teams in baseball but he can't start here.

The Cubs currently project to have 15 players (10 H and 5 P) with a WAR of at least 2. So while they have elite top end talent that will compare/be slightly less than other teams top end, their 10th best player will be a solid regular player.

The beauty of this team/roster is that it's not all on the shoulders of one or two guys; if Rizzo struggles then the Cubs have more than enough offense around him to score runs.
 

JosMin

Entirely too much tuna
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Nov 22, 2011
Posts:
8,201
Liked Posts:
3,271
Location:
Jeffersonville, Indiana
drink all the kool aid that you wish. It's your right.

The season hasn't started yet and you're already salty? Glad nothing's changed while I was gone.
 

JosMin

Entirely too much tuna
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Nov 22, 2011
Posts:
8,201
Liked Posts:
3,271
Location:
Jeffersonville, Indiana
I'll have to, since you are apparently incapable or unwilling of engaging in an actual discussion in this thread.



You accusing other people of trolling you in the Cubs forum. That's rich. Here's your first post in this thread:



Oh, you're as pure as the driven snow, you are.

Where have you been all my life <3
 

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
6 historically bad teams?? I wouldn't go that far. maybe 1 or 2. to be historically bad youre talking like 42 wins...there wont be 6 teams that low in win totals. so really youre talking a pretty normal league outside of 1 or 2 teams IMO :shrug:

I think you got 6 teams that struggle for 70 wins. That's historically bad I think. Could be a record.
 

SilenceS

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
21,846
Liked Posts:
9,041
Lulz, people actually engaged this convo?
 

Top