Desperate pick from a desperate GM..

mattb78

My threads are FTO !
Joined:
Sep 18, 2012
Posts:
3,992
Liked Posts:
4,482
Location:
Orlando
Warren should have fired Poles last year and now we have a 15-36 GM trying to get above .500 next season to save his job . It will be 4 drafts for Poles with no pass rushers selected at premium spots.

And yesterday we took another non-premium position in an early draft slot. Brock Bowers was a much better prospect than anyone in this years class and even he didn't go until #13.

Yes Loveland helps the coach and scheme, but he is a complete low ceiling player with below average athleticism score for a top 10 pick. How many targets is he really going to get with Moore and Odunze out there, two other guys we paid alot to acquire?
 

1COBearsfan

We’re all mad here
Donator
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
4,298
Liked Posts:
2,452
Location:
Denver, Co
Yes Loveland helps the coach and scheme

This is all anyone needs to see and/or hear. If the person who is going to be coaching the team says he needs player X and that he is super ultra mega important , then the GM’s job is to get player X. That’s what he needs to do to save his job. This seems like Professional Sports 101 to me
 

Szlachcic

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 29, 2020
Posts:
2,100
Liked Posts:
1,952
Location:
Georgia
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Georgia Bulldogs
but he is a complete low ceiling player with below average athleticism score for a top 10 pick.
Where did you got the information from? LOL

There are lots of opinions, but for me, I have no problem with this pick largely because this one was clearly B. Johnson pick, and he is the one that 'cook'..
 

discplayer

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 30, 2012
Posts:
1,532
Liked Posts:
891
Location:
Atlanta
Warren should have fired Poles last year and now we have a 15-36 GM trying to get above .500 next season to save his job . It will be 4 drafts for Poles with no pass rushers selected at premium spots.

And yesterday we took another non-premium position in an early draft slot. Brock Bowers was a much better prospect than anyone in this years class and even he didn't go until #13.

Yes Loveland helps the coach and scheme, but he is a complete low ceiling player with below average athleticism score for a top 10 pick. How many targets is he really going to get with Moore and Odunze out there, two other guys we paid alot to acquire?
"We paid alot" to acquire Odunze?
 

alswank87

Well-known member
Joined:
Jul 15, 2021
Posts:
1,349
Liked Posts:
786
I see what Ben Johnson is doing. DJ Moore and Rome Odunze are pretty big WRs with speed, and we have two good pass catching TEs. We will be able to use size to our advantage.
 

Rise

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
9,951
Liked Posts:
9,659
Location:
Laughing at Tom Brady
He has a high ceiling, if his shoulder allows him to raise his hands up to touch it. He is the ideal “Y” TE that every team wants, again, if he can lift his arms over his head come August.
 

gallagher

Ave Atque Vale
Donator
Joined:
Sep 27, 2010
Posts:
8,159
Liked Posts:
7,247
Location:
Of Semi-Fixed Address
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
  2. Ohio Bobcats
"We paid alot" to acquire Odunze?
We didn't pay to acquire Moore either. The Panthers paid us for 1OA.

The OP also gets other items either incorrect, or they aren't completely thought through. For one, Brock Bowers had 5 QBs go in front of him. Shouldn't a weaker QB draft class then push the other talents up the list? On another item for the same point, last year's draft included a wealth of top WR talents, and this year's draft did not. So a talented receiving weapon of a TE will also naturally rise up the board this year as opposed to last year.

For a second point, I think that crediting only first round picks as premium picks is fishy. Why are 39 and 41 in this year's draft not premium picks? Was drafting Dexter with a second rounder, or trading a second rounder for Sweat, not using premium assets to acquire pass rushers? I'm on the other side of that argument.

Finally, look, crediting a dumpster fire year where the team was objectively cutting dead weight and tanking to the GM is tiresome. Even so, the math doesn't match. You can't go from 15-36 to above .500 in a single year. This is just loaded with assumptions I cannot get behind.
 

Xplosive

*Warning*...^Triggered by Mentioning The Haul...
Joined:
Aug 15, 2013
Posts:
5,825
Liked Posts:
3,114
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
Warren should have fired Poles last year and now we have a 15-36 GM trying to get above .500 next season to save his job . It will be 4 drafts for Poles with no pass rushers selected at premium spots.

And yesterday we took another non-premium position in an early draft slot. Brock Bowers was a much better prospect than anyone in this years class and even he didn't go until #13.

Yes Loveland helps the coach and scheme, but he is a complete low ceiling player with below average athleticism score for a top 10 pick. How many targets is he really going to get with Moore and Odunze out there, two other guys we paid alot to acquire?
In the previous three drafts he's selected WR, OT, and QB all with premium picks. Your entire premise is biased and hyperbolic.

Ignoring free agent acquisitions as if only draft acquisitions matter is also biased. At the end of the day he has found about 3 quality players per draft which is pretty good.

Wins and losses are what matters now and if they win a good amount of games and Loveland is a major contributor, no one will care or remember where he was drafted.
 

discplayer

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 30, 2012
Posts:
1,532
Liked Posts:
891
Location:
Atlanta
We didn't pay to acquire Moore either. The Panthers paid us for 1OA.

The OP also gets other items either incorrect, or they aren't completely thought through. For one, Brock Bowers had 5 QBs go in front of him. Shouldn't a weaker QB draft class then push the other talents up the list? On another item for the same point, last year's draft included a wealth of top WR talents, and this year's draft did not. So a talented receiving weapon of a TE will also naturally rise up the board this year as opposed to last year.

For a second point, I think that crediting only first round picks as premium picks is fishy. Why are 39 and 41 in this year's draft not premium picks? Was drafting Dexter with a second rounder, or trading a second rounder for Sweat, not using premium assets to acquire pass rushers? I'm on the other side of that argument.

Finally, look, crediting a dumpster fire year where the team was objectively cutting dead weight and tanking to the GM is tiresome. Even so, the math doesn't match. You can't go from 15-36 to above .500 in a single year. This is just loaded with assumptions I cannot get behind.
All well put
 

ZOMBIE@CTESPN

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 19, 2012
Posts:
19,729
Liked Posts:
18,458
Location:
MICHIGAN
Poles did the same thing he did with Eberflus-give that coach what he asked for to succeed.

This isn't a desperate pick. It's a GM giving the HC the tools he asked for.
Eberflus told flus he doesn’t need an ol or dl?
 

Top