dougthonus
New member
- Joined:
- Mar 13, 2009
- Posts:
- 2,665
- Liked Posts:
- 9
I see your point, and I would love the 3yr thing, but 1yr is just dumb and pointless. And I'm sorry Doug, but the "who cares?" comment, c'mon, are you telling me you're not gonna care when one of your own kids cheats on a test? It's the "who cares?" attitude that keeps this type of stuff going on in the first place.
It depends on the circumstances. If there is an artificial barrier placed in front of my kids preventing them from fully following their dream and the barrier has nothing to do with that dream and is 100% irrelevant to their life in the future, then no. I would not be upset. Especially if the majority if people following this dream are cheating in some way as well.
For example, say my daughter was going to be a doctor, and for some reason harvard medical decided to institute a rule that all incoming med students had to run a 6 second 40 yard dash, and my daughter could only run a 6.5. I wouldn't be too upset if she figured away to let someone else run for her. The rule is ridiculous for what she wants to do and has no impact on her future life.
I speed everyday. This is illegal, but so does everyone else. I don't see anything wrong with speeding nor do I find it immoral as long as it's within certain bounds. Clearly there is a point where speeding is bad (driving 150 mph in school zone wouldn't be too cool).
The line between legal and moral isn't a perfect line to me. Probably 99% of cheating on tests would be highly immoral to me, but in this case, the test itself is immoral. It serves no purpose except to prevent people from following their dreams, dreams which are not reliant on the test results.