- Joined:
- May 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 2,745
- Liked Posts:
- 0
Well you can forget the moral bullshit, that's personal and should remain that way. So then what changes the legal standpoint? Because it's happened in these kind of cases all throughout history before. It's people like Kevorkian. People like Rosa Parks, like Martin Luther King, etc. The circumstances and topics are different from each other in my examples of course, but the main point is the same.There are those who must take that initial risk to push the evolution of whatever it is holding us back from progressing, even meaning breaking a law if that be the case. Those first people to take that plunge are almost always demonized, ostracized, persecuted and even killed. Because they chose not to be "normal".
It's the same song and dance, the same routine with how the majority of the "normal" people and especially the media deal with guys like Kevorkian. You've followed it to a tune. We put labels on them, be it creepy, lonely, odd, traitor, ****** lover, hippie, Commie, fascist, Marxist, baby killer, ******, pussy, whatever works. Whatever we'll run with. Whatever it is that best fits the circumstances. Whatever that is most convenient and, more importantly, most polarizing, the one that puts them in as much a negative light as possible, that separates them as much as possible from the "normal" people. Something that might dissuade potential supporters from being associated with that person.
BAH! Commie liberal hippie fubbary!!