ESPN not drinking the Kool Aid

[Myk]

People keep assuming that Daniels is the center of the future (myself included) even though some scouts believed he could end up being a guard in the NFL. Remember, he was a guard before becoming a center.

Then we need a center ASAP :bowrofl:

 

[Speed]

Doesn’t bother me. Fuck the projections it’s finally time to prove it on the field.

 

[SugarWalls]

And you don't think ESPN takes those things into account? Are you playing the same teams as last year, and do those teams have the same rosters? Newflash, the answer is no. Your looking at the Bears under a microscope, because you believe you know the Bears better than any ESPN analyst. Maybe you do, but here is the catch that everyone forgets to think about. How well do you know the teams that the Bears play this year? Not very well is my guess. And that is where they have the edge over you in predicting games. All the other crap you posted is just pure speculation on your part, nothing more.

1. Every year there are teams that do worse, and then there are teams that do better. I've seen you say this before that "all teams have made improvements in the off season." That is factually not true. All teams have made changes, but not all of those are for the better.

2. ESPN's predictions are 'pure speculation.' What is wrong with disagreeing with their speculation with your own thoughts and speculation?

 

[nc0gnet0]

1. Every year there are teams that do worse, and then there are teams that do better. I've seen you say this before that "all teams have made improvements in the off season." That is factually not true. All teams have made changes, but not all of those are for the better.

2. ESPN's predictions are 'pure speculation.' What is wrong with disagreeing with their speculation with your own thoughts and speculation?

2) There is nothing wrong with disagreeing with there predictions, but I called WestcoastIdiot out because he labeled them as Bears haters, when in fact they have been rather generous with there predictions in regards to the Bears in the past.

1) I can agree with that, but the Bears themselves fall into that category until we see results on the field, which is the general consensus from most reasonable people.