- Joined:
- Jun 19, 2011
- Posts:
- 32,905
- Liked Posts:
- 26,050
yup, good thing we have the whole story and not just some article saying that officials won't comment.
Round and round BB goes, when he'll catch a clue nobody knows.
YouYou said he was guilty and would be convicted
I said he would not be convicted
Now who needs the clue??
Explained this to you before, dolt. Won't be going on that merry-go-round with your dumb ass.Yeah..he was convicted...
No, he's guilty as hell.Only if you want to
BTW...hes not guilty
No, he's guilty as hell.
Not in America he isnt
Legally speaking and only due to the incredible stupidity of the jurors and Americans in general. America leads the way in most vaccines recommended. This damages the brains of the plebs and makes them dummies. I bet you've had more than your fair share of vaccines.
Legally guilty or not does not change the fact that he is guilty. He will forever remain guilty despite the miscarriage of justice. Once you commit the act you are responsible and guilty of it forever. It was obvious to see he had racist tendencies before and also had many incidents that were violent and threatening with weapon in hand both before and after the case. This is a pussy that's pulled guns on women during arguments. Daddy, the judge, gets him preferential treatment but this cowardly loose cannon has never been able to hide the POS despicable mutt he is.That's all we have to go on..Everyone's morals are different...Legally he is Not Guilty, and that's that. If you had information that would convict him, you should have come forward at the appropriate time..Just saying "I know he's guilty" doesn't cut it, and makes you look silly
You can "think" he is guilty or not guilty all day long, but the fact remains..He is NOT GUILTY
How many times and different ways do you have to be told he was found Not Guilty, and therefore he is Not Guilty?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5Foljz84wc
Legally guilty or not does not change the fact that he is guilty. He will forever remain guilty despite the miscarriage of justice. Once you commit the act you are responsible and guilty of it forever. It was obvious to see he had racist tendencies before and also had many incidents that were violent and threatening with weapon in hand both before and after the case. This is a pussy that's pulled guns on women during arguments. Daddy, the judge, gets him preferential treatment but this cowardly loose cannon has never been able to hide the POS despicable mutt he is.
Shut up, Bud. He shot that little unarmed boy for no good reason other than he's one of those freaks who clings to his gun to compensate for his lack of testicular fortitude. As we know, men who cling to guns are evil cowards and all too often too quick to overreact.It most certainly does..In this country if you are tried of a crime and found NOT GUILTY...You are NOT GUILTY..It's just that simple
You can dislike the fact, you can hate the guy..But it is a fact and has been recorded in the court records...
George Zimmerman is NOT GUILTY
" It was obvious to see he had racist tendencies before and also had many incidents that were violent and threatening with weapon in hand both before and after the case. This is a pussy that's pulled guns on women during arguments. Daddy, the judge, gets him preferential treatment but this cowardly loose cannon has never been able to hide the POS despicable mutt he is"
None of that could be used in the trial for manslaughter which he was charged with...And thats exactly why he is NOT GUILTY!
No matter how much you try and spin the facts,there is one fact you cannot spin...He is NOT GUILTY
Could be, especially if in another country and then brought back here, but was it illegal back when he did it? Either way, all I said was it doesn't seem like he intentionally committed any crime.
how did the civil case go though?
So you post the definition of guilty and still miss the fact it doesn't have to be thought of in simply legal terms. How is this possible? All this time you've been acting like it's a word that can only be used if you were actually found guilty in a court of law yet the definition you post doesn't even say that and still you remain clueless.OK..I will break this down do even you can get it
definition of NOT...
https://dictionary.search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0LEV093YUBTJhEAAXlXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTB0OGxtNWtwBHNlYwNzYwRjb2xvA2JmMQR2dGlkA1NNRTQyMV8x?p=not&.sep=
not
Houghton Mifflin
adv.adverb
In no way; to no degree
Dhttp://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/guiltyefinition of guilty
guilty adjective \ˈgil-tē\
: responsible for committing a crime or doing something bad or wrong
Now, we put those 2 together and we have...
In no way; to no degree...responsible for committing a crime or doing something bad or wrong..
That is exactly what the jury said,He is in no way responsible for committing the crime he was charged with
Therefore...he is...
Do you understand that he was found...
NOT GUILTY?
Not Guilty means he isnt Guilty
It means exactly what it says......NOT GUILTY. Do you understand now?
Plus...Even before he was charged he was Not Guilty!
You need a lesson in American Justice