FREE AGENCY NO NEWS THREAD

monkforasia

Active member
Joined:
Mar 26, 2016
Posts:
273
Liked Posts:
157
Think market for hunter has moved past what poles is comfortable with. Can see 30m a year for him after what burns got. Pivoting more to trading down from 9 for more draft capital. Get a 2nd tier wr along with Robinson from Missouri.
 

MikeDitkaPolishSausage

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 12, 2013
Posts:
9,095
Liked Posts:
6,916
Location:
Black Rainbow’s Grandma’s house.
Jokes on you, its because they planned to keep fieldss all along and put caleb williams at RB.
Bears will have both on the field at the same time while simultaneously playing QB. Bears fans wanted more shifts/motions at the los. Well they will get it now. No one will f*cking know who is taking the snap. Swift was the biggest smokescreen signing.
 

Spitta Andretti

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
9,738
Liked Posts:
14,312
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
LOL you predicted a trade on March 8 so the irony is it is you that couldn't predict what Rappaport reported.

It wasn't stated what the Bears would do either way so the trading the 1st pick talk is also premature. They still have meetings with the rookies. Bears not knowing what they're doing yet would definitely be a Bears move though
 

truthbedamned

I don't have a party
Donator
Joined:
Aug 31, 2014
Posts:
16,105
Liked Posts:
9,534
Location:
Socialist Republic of California
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
Not as nice as avoiding paying a QB 40m a year when he can't even fetch a 2nd in trade.
I don't believe you are buying into that shit.

Pretty sad.

Got a link?

Edit: Read post below.
 

Xplosive

In the Land of the Blind the One Eyed Fan Is Neggd
Joined:
Aug 15, 2013
Posts:
4,461
Liked Posts:
2,233
Location:
Chicago
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
Not as nice as avoiding paying a QB 40m a year when he can't even fetch a 2nd in trade.
I beg to differ since DE's & WR's are going for $30M AAV each... Furthermore could you explain how a QB that "Isn't worth a second rounder" would command a $40M contract??

Wouldn't the Bears simply match whatever he is offered in free agency?
 

dentfan

No gods! No Masters!
Joined:
Apr 28, 2013
Posts:
5,211
Liked Posts:
4,448
Clown all you want. If the Bears didn’t try to move Fields, da haul is on!

Again, I’m not sure if the NFL medicals are HIPAA protected. It may drag due to Cdubs being Cdubs and not letting everyone get ahold of his medicals during the combine. Seriously, what the fuck kind of move was that? Anyway, dude has his reasons. He’s a business, man, not a businessman.

Get da haul!

1710200074215.jpeg

Big Poles playing Spades!
 

modo

Based
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
29,541
Liked Posts:
24,079
Location:
USA
The next move will be after Williams' physical.

A very reasonable explanation is wanting to get a full physical on Williams...

Claiming the Bears couldn't trade Fields because no one wanted to give up a draft choice just makes you look like a functional tard.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
60,086
Liked Posts:
38,734
I don't believe you are buying into that shit.

Pretty sad.

Got a link?

Edit: Read post below.

I posted the vid of Rappaport's report that you liked so I am aware. Again if a team called offering a 1st or 2nd Fields is likely already gone. Just because Bears haven't tried to trade him doesn't mean they haven't gotten calls on him and know what teams are willing to pay.
 
Last edited:

msadows

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 23, 2012
Posts:
24,869
Liked Posts:
20,142
I posted a vid of Rapport's report. Again if a team called offering a 1st or 2nd Fields is likely already gone. Just because Bears haven't tried to trade him doesn't mean they haven't gotten calls in him and know what teams are willing to pay.

Unless they are trying to keep him to be their in-house PFF analyst.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
60,086
Liked Posts:
38,734
I beg to differ since DE's & WR's are going for $30M AAV each... Furthermore could you explain how a QB that "Isn't worth a second rounder" would command a $40M contract??

Wouldn't the Bears simply match whatever he is offered in free agency?

You can get one of those at 9 so the question is whether a QB on a rookie contract is better or a DE/WR. The obvious answer across the NFL is QB.

If Fields is not worth 40-50m then you most definitely should take a chance on a QB that is. The next elite QB is probably getting 60m a year when their contract us up.
 

modo

Based
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
29,541
Liked Posts:
24,079
Location:
USA
I posted a vid of Rapport's report. Again if a team called offering a 1st or 2nd Fields is likely already gone. Just because Bears haven't tried to trade him doesn't mean they haven't gotten calls in him and know what teams are willing to pay.

This is just a guess like all the tarded guesses that no one was willing to give up a draft choice at all.
 

Leon Sandcastle

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Feb 5, 2013
Posts:
4,329
Liked Posts:
3,521
I posted a vid of Rapport's report. Again if a team called offering a 1st or 2nd Fields is likely already gone. Just because Bears haven't tried to trade him doesn't mean they haven't gotten calls in him and know what teams are willing to pay.
That doesn't fit the narrative of us CW supporters. NOBODY WANTED FIELDS. NOT EVEN WORTH A 6TH. ....Sheesh! Yall will be better off when you just realize these FACTS. Why? I don't know. You just will.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
60,086
Liked Posts:
38,734
This is just a guess like all the tarded guesses that no one was willing to give up a draft choice at all.

Yes it is a guess just like your saying the Bears will keep Fields is a guess. Hence the use of the words "if" and "likely" to signal it is not an absolute statement. Are you the only one allowed to guess?
 

Top