Free Agency Talk & Rumors - Bears get Dalman 3/$42M, Josh Allen is RICH ($330M contract), DK is a Steeler, Mack back to LAC

hester247

hester247

Active member
Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
Posts:
449
Liked Posts:
152
Location:
Illinois
Xplosive said:
On top of being 4 years younger...
Demarcus Walker has 33" Arms.... Dayo has 35" Arms... No matter if you guys don't want to believe it, and no matter what she tells you...

Size Matters.
Click to expand...
THEN WHY HASN'T HE PRODUCED? 3 sacks for 35" arms...damn imagine if he had 37' arms he might get 5 sacks
 
DefNextYear

DefNextYear

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 21, 2024
Posts:
3,172
Liked Posts:
2,988
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
I wonder if Dalman reportedly taking less money had anything to do with bringing in his teammate Jarrett? Probably not, but taking paycuts for teams you have no loyalty to is otherwise odd.
 
Beast15

Beast15

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 5, 2012
Posts:
2,749
Liked Posts:
2,673
oso4lyf said:
Tiger can't change his stripes.

I'm sure you were fapping last year when Flus grew a beard and thought it changed the fact he can't coach his way out of wet paper bag.
Click to expand...
Nope. But you should cry like a ***** over moves just made and don’t give a chance to see on the field first.
 
Nelly

Nelly

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 13, 2018
Posts:
7,638
Liked Posts:
8,975
It's weird to see the Bears recognize a shortcoming of their team and really hit it hard. Other than Smythe at TE (who's role is to block though), every move we've made is trenches.
 
Les Grossman

Les Grossman

Well-known member
Joined:
Jun 22, 2011
Posts:
16,109
Liked Posts:
15,080
DefNextYear said:
I wonder if Dalman reportedly taking less money had anything to do with bringing in his teammate Jarrett? Probably not, but taking paycuts for teams you have no loyalty to is otherwise odd.
Click to expand...
It’s probably semantics and actually took more guaranteed money but less “total” money or something like that
 
pseudonym

pseudonym

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jan 11, 2014
Posts:
7,144
Liked Posts:
4,530
Location:
Chicago
I've said all year that I would only go Jeanty at #10 if we improved the OL. We've done that, PLUS the DL and a blocking TE. I'm totally okay taking Jeanty at #10. He is a blue chipper, has the HIGHEST ranking on NFL.COM. If he is Gibbs for Ben, then you take him. I would prefer we don't trade up to get him. If he goes to LVR at #6 then you re-evaluate—LT, DE, DT, G, C. Probably Membou as we aren't sure what Braxton is. Maybe with improved IOL he plays better. I feel like our OL isn't a sieve any more.
 
oso4lyf

oso4lyf

Well-known member
Joined:
Sep 13, 2021
Posts:
1,342
Liked Posts:
1,392
Location:
Cooper City, FL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Miami Hurricanes
Beast15 said:
Nope. But you should cry like a ***** over moves just made and don’t give a chance to see on the field first.
Click to expand...
Soooo edgy lolol

"Why can't you just blindly celebrate signing a 31 year old DT coming off his worst year and a 3 sack DE??" is how I'm reading this
 
Bears_Almighty

Bears_Almighty

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Mar 21, 2022
Posts:
343
Liked Posts:
557
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  2. North Carolina Tar Heels
Nelly said:
If you're wanting a RB that bad then yea, trade down a bit and take Hampton around #20. Dude's got some serious Matt Forte vibes. Use the other assets you pick up to continue to build the pipeline with talent.
Click to expand...
I was just thinking this same thing!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

10,946members
96,244threads
4,566,775posts
490online users

Members online NOW

  • Member
  • Admin
  • Mod
  • Donor
  • HOF
Total: 490 (members: 26, guests: 464)

Staff online NOW

Top