Hawks FA 'Plan'

ClydeLee

New member
Joined:
Jun 29, 2010
Posts:
14,829
Liked Posts:
4,113
Location:
The OP
We would also have Kruger in Rockford for a quick fix at Center

I was thinking that for the likelyhood of Connolly or Bolland getting hurt within the year
 
Last edited:

bobferg

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Oct 16, 2010
Posts:
1,186
Liked Posts:
275
Location:
Indianapolis
No way Morin is an extra skater. That would crush his development.
 

bobferg

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Oct 16, 2010
Posts:
1,186
Liked Posts:
275
Location:
Indianapolis
then (if my situation were real) send him to rockford

Morin > Olesz or however you spell that god awful player's name.

and has a much smaller cap hit.
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
Morin > Olesz or however you spell that god awful player's name.

and has a much smaller cap hit.

From what Bowman said...Olesz is staying
 

ClydeLee

New member
Joined:
Jun 29, 2010
Posts:
14,829
Liked Posts:
4,113
Location:
The OP
He'll likely be injured sometime in the season that can hopefully allow Morin to come up and get playing time.

They either expect him to slov off of Hossa or be a quality Czecher. :)
 

southern_cross_116

New member
Joined:
May 24, 2010
Posts:
1,748
Liked Posts:
1,012
Location:
Australia
Dunno- presuming resiging Campoli, I think if I am coaching -then Seabrook and Keith get split, in order to spread things around more.

Probably Montador- Leddy, Seabrook Hjalmarsson and Campoli - Keith

Reasoning, is maybe Hjalmarsson can regain more physicality by playing with Seabrook, want more experience with Leddy, than Campoli, and Campoli goes on the top line by default...

however, if the team were to decide to go after Hejda, I mightn't resign Campoli.

Connolly/Drury are good- both have some injury questions. Makes for a fairly deep team, would go after Talbot instead of Rupp ... seems to have a better 4th line attitude- but probably could fit all of those guys in -even if you just have to have Rupp.
 

bobferg

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Oct 16, 2010
Posts:
1,186
Liked Posts:
275
Location:
Indianapolis
Dunno- presuming resiging Campoli, I think if I am coaching -then Seabrook and Keith get split, in order to spread things around more.

Probably Montador- Leddy, Seabrook Hjalmarsson and Campoli - Keith

Reasoning, is maybe Hjalmarsson can regain more physicality by playing with Seabrook, want more experience with Leddy, than Campoli, and Campoli goes on the top line by default...

however, if the team were to decide to go after Hejda, I mightn't resign Campoli.

Connolly/Drury are good- both have some injury questions. Makes for a fairly deep team, would go after Talbot instead of Rupp ... seems to have a better 4th line attitude- but probably could fit all of those guys in -even if you just have to have Rupp.


I think the idea is to have a puck moving defender in each pairing.
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
I think the idea is to have a puck moving defender in each pairing.

Yea...they want 1 puck mover and 1 stay at home/bruiser
 

southern_cross_116

New member
Joined:
May 24, 2010
Posts:
1,748
Liked Posts:
1,012
Location:
Australia
Puckmovers:

If that is the case, then the team is short 1 proven "puck mover" no matter how you slice it.

Leddy isn't it (not proven at least), Campoli *might* be one, Montedor is *sorta* one. Seabrook had 39 assists (but didn't sustain it in the playoffs). You could actually argue that the team is short 2 proven "puck movers" in fact, if you don't count Seabrook.

So maybe you are talking about skating mobility instead of passing?
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
Puckmovers:

If that is the case, then the team is short 1 proven "puck mover" no matter how you slice it.

Leddy isn't it (not proven at least), Campoli *might* be one, Montedor is *sorta* one. Seabrook had 39 assists (but didn't sustain it in the playoffs). You could actually argue that the team is short 2 proven "puck movers" in fact, if you don't count Seabrook.

So maybe you are talking about skating mobility instead of passing?

Thats what I meant...

Keith, Campoli, Leddy would be those players IMO
 

Top