- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,922
- Liked Posts:
- 2,701
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 26,017
- Liked Posts:
- 3,297
- Location:
- Minnesota
My favorite teams
Hope Not
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,922
- Liked Posts:
- 2,701
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
Edmonton has an awful lot of young forward talent, and our system is stocked with d-men....I would trade him now for some young talent, then look to resign him in the summer if we can
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 26,017
- Liked Posts:
- 3,297
- Location:
- Minnesota
My favorite teams
Re-signing him makes it OK. But can we even afford to re-sign him? Damn salary cap.
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
do it now!
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
the hawks would be insane if they did not explore a trade. I am tired of the hype that the keith/seabrook pairing get all the time. He is going to get paid alot, so no, dont resign him, trade him while you can get a return. we need forwards dammit.
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,922
- Liked Posts:
- 2,701
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
I would absolutely look to get back some forward talent from Edmonton whether we resign him or not
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 26,017
- Liked Posts:
- 3,297
- Location:
- Minnesota
My favorite teams
Ya, I just don't want them throwing in the towel on this season just yet.
- Joined:
- Apr 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 19,670
- Liked Posts:
- 6,438
- Location:
- Chicago
Too bad the Oilers wouldn't take Soupy's shit contract.
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 26,017
- Liked Posts:
- 3,297
- Location:
- Minnesota
My favorite teams
Ya, if he's a FA after the season (right?), why would Edmonton even want him?
- Joined:
- Apr 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 19,670
- Liked Posts:
- 6,438
- Location:
- Chicago
No, Soupy has 4 years left on it.
7.1 mil for a guy putting up nothing on offense.
7.1 mil for a guy putting up nothing on offense.
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 26,017
- Liked Posts:
- 3,297
- Location:
- Minnesota
My favorite teams
Oh, people were talking about signing him in FA, threw me off.
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,922
- Liked Posts:
- 2,701
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
Soupy is Campbell, not Seabrook JNTG...Seabrook is a FA this summer
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 26,017
- Liked Posts:
- 3,297
- Location:
- Minnesota
My favorite teams
Sorry, I'm sick, not thinking clearly. Thanks.
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 26,017
- Liked Posts:
- 3,297
- Location:
- Minnesota
My favorite teams
I saw that they were working on an extension as of January 24 though.
- Joined:
- May 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,905
- Liked Posts:
- 1,974
I have a tough time putting any stock in this. This doesn't make sense unless the organization really believes Hammer is ready to step up and pair with Keith. Maybe this was cooked up because of his dumbass running of the mouth yesterday to put a stupid fright in him (or the rest of the team for that matter). I mean, he's a young, physical top pairing D-man who already has chemistry with one of the best PMD in the league. This shouldn't be taken lightly. Are we getting back a physical D prospect closer to the NHL than Olsen to step into a vacant top 4 role...because flipping him adds a hole to our D-corps even next year. Sure they have some nice looking young forwards, but we'll need to acquire a top 4 in his absence next year.
He's restricted and Edmonton has a lot of space available next year with a lot of players already signed - seems very improbable to be able to re-attain via offersheet.
Sure, call me a homer, but if this is the Stan's stance that we're going to flip Seabs then we might as well flip Hossa, too. Then we could completely rebuild around Toews, Kane, Keith.
Sorry if I'm all over the place - i am so sick right now.
Edit: Fuckit, trade Sharp too...if you thought his value was high last offseason, it's gotta be skyhigh this season.
He's restricted and Edmonton has a lot of space available next year with a lot of players already signed - seems very improbable to be able to re-attain via offersheet.
Sure, call me a homer, but if this is the Stan's stance that we're going to flip Seabs then we might as well flip Hossa, too. Then we could completely rebuild around Toews, Kane, Keith.
Sorry if I'm all over the place - i am so sick right now.
Edit: Fuckit, trade Sharp too...if you thought his value was high last offseason, it's gotta be skyhigh this season.
Last edited:
- Joined:
- May 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,905
- Liked Posts:
- 1,974
Me, too! This flu season has kicked my ass...twice!! I'm so pissed.
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 26,017
- Liked Posts:
- 3,297
- Location:
- Minnesota
My favorite teams
I have a tough time putting any stock in this. This doesn't make sense unless the organization really believes Hammer is ready to step up and pair with Keith. Maybe this was cooked up because of his dumbass running of the mouth yesterday to put a stupid fright in him (or the rest of the team for that matter). I mean, he's a young, physical top pairing D-man who already has chemistry with one of the best PMD in the league. This shouldn't be taken lightly. Are we getting back a physical D prospect closer to the NHL than Olsen to step into a vacant top 4 role...because flipping him adds a hole to our D-corps even next year. Sure they have some nice looking young forwards, but we'll need to acquire a top 4 in his absence next year.
He's restricted and Edmonton has a lot of space available next year with a lot of players already signed - seems very improbable to be able to re-attain via offersheet.
Sure, call me a homer, but if this is the Stan's stance that we're going to flip Seabs then we might as well flip Hossa, too. Then we could completely rebuild around Toews, Kane, Keith, and Sharp.
Sorry if I'm all over the place - i am so sick right now.
It was already shot down in one of the links that were posted here, there was nothing to it.
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 29,059
- Liked Posts:
- 7,249
I have a tough time putting any stock in this. This doesn't make sense unless the organization really believes Hammer is ready to step up and pair with Keith. Maybe this was cooked up because of his dumbass running of the mouth yesterday to put a stupid fright in him (or the rest of the team for that matter). I mean, he's a young, physical top pairing D-man who already has chemistry with one of the best PMD in the league. This shouldn't be taken lightly. Are we getting back a physical D prospect closer to the NHL than Olsen to step into a vacant top 4 role...because flipping him adds a hole to our D-corps even next year. Sure they have some nice looking young forwards, but we'll need to acquire a top 4 in his absence next year.
He's restricted and Edmonton has a lot of space available next year with a lot of players already signed - seems very improbable to be able to re-attain via offersheet.
Sure, call me a homer, but if this is the Stan's stance that we're going to flip Seabs then we might as well flip Hossa, too. Then we could completely rebuild around Toews, Kane, Keith.
Sorry if I'm all over the place - i am so sick right now.
Edit: Fuckit, trade Sharp too...if you thought his value was high last offseason, it's gotta be skyhigh this season.
here is my response sickboy
Assets:
Kane
Toews
Hossa
Keith
Sharp
Leave those 5 alone, and build around them.
with bonuses coming off the books, and if they do not re sign seabrook, and can find a suitor for campbell we can build a pretty damn good team.
Staff online NOW
-
bamainatlantaYou wake him up, you keep him up -
Penny Traitorバカでも才能は一つ