- Joined:
- Nov 30, 2010
- Posts:
- 1,613
- Liked Posts:
- 434
- Location:
- Rocky Top
The bold is the part that I don't think is true. I don't think that you can get anyone in free agency for that -as the guy is also doing ok offensively (as defensemen go).
However I do definitely agree that the guy's trade value is way up there. However the key difference is that he is an RFA not a UFA which means that the ball is really in the Hawks' court as far as Seabrook's retention is concerned.
Well, I specifically left out the offensive part on purpose. I was responding to another post specifically about his defensive ability.