- Joined:
- Jul 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 14,948
- Liked Posts:
- 6,826
- Location:
- In the stratosphere
My favorite teams
I would take that bet.He would get 4000 easily
I would take that bet.He would get 4000 easily
I bet he's not.With this OL, he would get decimated. Still a big upgrade, but just not worth it. He’s probably Pace’s #1 guy right now I’m sure.
4000 sacks?He would get 4000 easily
Rumors are just rumors. It's rumor season.Bears are dumpster divers
What else is new?Bears are dumpster divers
Stafford is better than Ryan? How many SB appearances and MVPs does Stafford have again? Does he have 10 4000 yard seasons in a row? FOH.No no Ryan. Watch a lot of Falcons because of where I live. No thanks. He has had the luxury of solid weapons, which is fine. Mahomes does also. But Ryan chokes all the damn time.
Stafford is a much better QB, but some didn’t want him. Well Ryan takes the padding the stats game to a whole new level.
I live in ATL too. Stafford never had near the weapons or the level of coaches/coordinators Ryan did. Ryan would’ve looked like the average QB he’s always been if he’s been on those DET teams. Stafford is no HOF-don’t get me wrong. But he’s sure as shit better than Matt Ryan.Stafford is better than Ryan? How many SB appearances and MVPs does Stafford have again? Does he have 10 4000 yard seasons in a row? FOH.
Stafford is younger that's about it.
I live in Atlanta fwiw.
Calvin Johnson?I live in ATL too. Stafford never had near the weapons or the level of coaches/coordinators Ryan did. Ryan would’ve looked like the average QB he’s always been if he’s been on those DET teams. Stafford is no HOF-don’t get me wrong. But he’s sure as shit better than Matt Ryan.
Julio Jones? Ridley? Of course Stafford had Johnson, but that whole roster and coaching hierarchy has been a shit show for decades. Both have had superstars (Ryan more so), but It takes a whole team and good coaching, play-calling. Ryan has had that on the offensive side of the ball his whole career. Stafford hasn’t.Calvin Johnson?
The Falcons had an absolutely shit O line for many of those 4000yd seasons. Julio been injured since Ridley has been there. We will just have to agree to disagree.. Im not even a Ryan fan but in his prime hes was better IMO.Julio Jones? Ridley? Of course Stafford had Johnson, but that whole roster and coaching hierarchy has been a shit show for decades. Both have had superstars (Ryan more so), but It takes a whole team and good coaching, play-calling. Ryan has had that on the offensive side of the ball his whole career. Stafford hasn’t.
Ryan needs dominant weapons and good protection to put up numbers. Stafford didn’t. Watching them play it is clear to me who’s the better QB. Just my honest opinion.
Wow man. Matt Ryan is Foles now? JFC.I wouldn't do it. Living in Georgia and see him play every Sunday I would pass. He is a mirror image of Foles maybe more durable , but that's about it. I'm sure Falcons would love to trade him because of huge cap hit.
YuckYou might want to start learning the name Teddy Bridgewater.......
You could get him relatively cheap.
Matt Ryan has had a really nice career. No doubt. Seems like a super nice guy too. But he’s getting up there in age. If he was on the Bears roster as currently constructed, I don’t think he would have much more success than Foles did. He’s not the answer. But hey, Stafford probably wasn’t either.Wow man. Matt Ryan is Foles now? JFC.