2323
New member
- Joined:
- May 26, 2013
- Posts:
- 2,228
- Liked Posts:
- 439
Due to a scarcity in offense, a lot of teams have good defense and pitching. A lot of rotations can probably look good against many of these offensively challenged teams.
Please learn about the word....could...Brett, I'm well of the paradigm of which you speak. But your reading comprehension is awful.
And none of that is relativeLol, Strikeouts per game are at all time high. Batting average is the lowest since 1992. Runs per game are the lowest since 1992 and OBP is lowest since 1972. To say hitting isnt at a premium is not watching real time baseball.
And none of that is relative
Please learn about the word....could...
How is it not relative?
What is this in referring to?
because it does not speak to the discussion at hand which is good pitching and defense wins champioships vs a team with all offense and no pitching.
your previous posts saying what could be a change of hitters are needed more than pitching to win championships.
because it does not speak to the discussion at hand which is good pitching and defense wins champioships vs a team with all offense and no pitching.
What do you think of team speed?
But that is just not true.
Good teams win championships. You can be a great hitting team and an average pitching team. Or you can be a great pitching team and an average hitting team. Or you can be a good hitting team and a good pitching team. There's no 1 formula for success. If there was, everyone would be doing that.
But that is just not true.
Good teams win championships. You can be a great hitting team and an average pitching team. Or you can be a great pitching team and an average hitting team. Or you can be a good hitting team and a good pitching team. There's no 1 formula for success. If there was, everyone would be doing that.
Depends. I place more value in OBA and smart base running. Speed in general is of lesser value. You can not steal 1B and stealing home is a risk.
Add to it unless you are stealing at a 80% clip every nab effectively lowers a players OBA value. Just like hitting into a double play.
that said, if you say that a player is well rounded and has solid base running skills which means that he can gamble rounding 3B or out leg a ground ball some times sure but that doesn't outweigh a player that gets on base or a player that can hit one into the stands on any pitch.
It held more value when there was astro turf and the players were on greenies vs being engineered nowadays as athletes.
Ok, so...? You're still struggling to grasp the concept, btw. But just keep parroting some truism that everyone is already familiar with.
But that is just not true.
Good teams win championships. You can be a great hitting team and an average pitching team. Or you can be a great pitching team and an average hitting team. Or you can be a good hitting team and a good pitching team. There's no 1 formula for success. If there was, everyone would be doing that.
There have been many of teams that have won a championship with not stellar pitching. To say pitching wins championship is compelled dependent on how the team is structured
Being the wordsmith that you are....what concept am I missing again? You've yet to state it...