- Joined:
- May 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 1,630
- Liked Posts:
- 0
Actually I had to stop reading this thread. Yes, Hull had serious flaws off the ice. But he is not getting a statute as a humanitarian, husband, family man, or model citizen. He was a failure at those. The statue is in honor of his achievements as a Blackhawk. For that he is most deserving of a statue. This is not debatable.
During the 15 years Bobby was a Blackhawk, he was the most exciting and electrifying player in the NHL, and the most beloved athlete in Chicago. For that, he deserves to be honored. The statue is beautiful and a great tribute to a truly great, elite, hockey player. We all have flaws. And we are all better than the worse things we have ever done. Even Bobby Hull.
Of course, Hull's flaws should not be forgotten. But there is a time and place. I do not think his flaws are serious enough to warrant him being totally blacklisted from being honored as a hockey great. Hull has an intense personality. That is often found in people who are very intensely driven to be the VERY BEST at what they do. Hull succeeded at that. Anybody see the 60 Minutes feature on Steve Jobs last night?
This thread is titled, "Hull Mikita statue." Not one word about Mikita. Really?? Wow. Why talk about Stan and his greatness as a Blackhawk when there is lots of mud to be thrown at other people. Someone just told me that the book on Walter Payton is not selling well. Good. It is muckraking. Nothing more, nothing less. Sure, Walter had a dark side. But he was also an icon and the greatest football player of his era, and the greatest Bear ever.
I am a proud Blackhawk fan. The organization has a very rich history, and some of its finest days was back in the ’60s when the Stadium was filled every single night to see Bobby Hull's mesmerizing rushes up the ice and lethal slap shot. It is important to remember history and honor true greatness. That’s all that’s being done here.
-5Minutes
Well said.