I Have Reached Mock Draft *Nirvana*

MDB111™

O Doyle Rules
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Oct 7, 2011
Posts:
21,623
Liked Posts:
15,076
Location:
Dongbears is thee worst!
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Maryland Terrapins
This is the foolproof, balanced mock draft that the Bears need to address as many needs as possible, without trades, to set the team up for a wildcard run in 2023 and deep playoff run in 2024 (pending Fields development, of course).

Pick 9: Darnell Wright, RT, Tenn-In this scenario Wright is the second OT off the board behind PJJ. My logic being that we know Wright can play RT. If we were to draft a young LT like Broderick Jones, or PJJ, if he's available, we'd have both tackle positions learning a "new" position--assuming Braxton moves to RT. Obviously the rookie LT would be adjusting to the NFL game, and Braxton Jones would probably be playing RT for the first time since before college. With Wright at RT, Braxton Jones can continue his development at LT.

Pick 52: Derick Hall, EDGE, Auburn-We need an edge rusher with some juice. Right now we have nobody coming off the edge that can get after the QB. Hall is that.

Pick 61: Gervon Dexter, DT, UF-BIg, long, mean DT. 6'5 315lbs. Excellent run defender that has the tools to develop into a menace inside. Could be our 3T of the future and internal disruptor.

Pick 64: Tyrique Stevenson, CB, Miami-Long, physical CB. 6' 200lbs. Played some safety at UGA before transferring to Miami. Would be an excellent Tampa-2 CB. Would allow Gordon to move inside where he belongs and round out the secondary nicely.

Pick 103: Ricky Stromberg, C, Arkansas-Strong, mean, nasty, athletic, run-blocking center. He could probably start year one, but with Whitehair we won't need him to. Can learn for a year before taking over in 2024.

Pick 133: Braeden Daniels, OG, Utah-Very experienced player with positional versatility. Has played both guard positions and LT so he has some athleticism to his game to be able to play outside--and excel as he was first team all-conference in 2022 as a LT.

Pick 136: Tyjae Spears, RB, Tulane-Board favorite. Good athleticism. One-cut back that would fit very nicely in this zone blocking scheme.

Pick 148: Luke Schoonmaker, TE, Mich-6'5, 250 athletic TE. 9.66 RAs, ran a 4.63 40. Would be a nice compliment to Kmet.

Pick 218: Nesta Jade Silvera, DT, ASU-This is an Eberflus guy. Plays hard every play, mean, nasty. 6'2, 315. Can play NT or 3T in this 4-3 defense. Could develop into a good backup DT.

Pick 258: Tavius Robinson, Edge, Ole Miss-Toolsy developmental DE. 6'6, 257, 4.66 40, 8.76 RAS score. Finished 2022 with the 2nd most forced fumbles with five and had seven sacks. Another player that could develop into a rotational guy with low-end starter upside.

QB: Fields,/ PJ Walker/Peterman
RB: Foreman/Herbert/Spears
WR: Moore/ESB
WR: Claypool/Pettis
WR: Mooney/VJJ
TE: Kmet/Tonyan/Schoonmaker
LT: Jones
LG: Jenkins/Daniels
C: Whitehair/Patrick/Stromberg
RG: Davis/Leatherwood/Carter
RT: Wright/Borom

DE: Walker/Gipson/D. Robinson
DT: Billings/Silvera
DT: Jones/Dexter
DE: R. Green/Hall/T. Robinson
LB: Edwards/Sanborn
LB: Edmunds/Lewis
CB: Johnson/Jones
NB: Gordon
CB: Stevenson/Vildor
S: Bojack
S: Brisker


I'm not as up to speed on a fewof your picks. Here's my take.

Why not trade#9 if PJJ is gone?
Also for RB, I like Duece Vaughn at that spot.
I also like Nathaniel TANK Dell especially as he falls in this draft.

Last, why a TE at all? Bears landed Tonyan and still have Kmet, Allen and Tonges.

I'm not gonna comment on your Dline pucks because I dont really know anything about them.

I like your Stromberg and Daniels picks.
 

JoJoBoxer

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
12,401
Liked Posts:
7,603
This is the foolproof, balanced mock draft that the Bears need to address as many needs as possible, without trades, to set the team up for a wildcard run in 2023 and deep playoff run in 2024 (pending Fields development, of course).

Pick 9: Darnell Wright, RT, Tenn-In this scenario Wright is the second OT off the board behind PJJ. My logic being that we know Wright can play RT. If we were to draft a young LT like Broderick Jones, or PJJ, if he's available, we'd have both tackle positions learning a "new" position--assuming Braxton moves to RT. Obviously the rookie LT would be adjusting to the NFL game, and Braxton Jones would probably be playing RT for the first time since before college. With Wright at RT, Braxton Jones can continue his development at LT.
I believe that everyone besides Skoronski has experience playing on the right side. Now, if you want to make the argument that Paris and Jones will have problems moving to the right side AND playing tackle, not guard, on the right side is going to be some impossible feat, I guess that I can live with that weak argument.

In your scenario, who is going to play LT if Broderick gets sick and cannot play?

In mine, Jones or Paris will be able to move to Fields' blind side.
Pick 52: Derick Hall, EDGE, Auburn-We need an edge rusher with some juice. Right now we have nobody coming off the edge that can get after the QB. Hall is that.
Raw but elite speed. You are going to have to live with some rough edges where drafted. Good pick at 53.
Pick 61: Gervon Dexter, DT, UF-BIg, long, mean DT. 6'5 315lbs. Excellent run defender that has the tools to develop into a menace inside. Could be our 3T of the future and internal disruptor.
I have some important information that everyone must read right now.


" A snail can sleep for three years.

All polar bears are left handed.

It is physically impossible for pigs to look up into the sky.

Hydra – an aquatic creature is the only living creature that never die. It regenerates, replacing its cells with fresh ones.

Elephants are the only animals that can’t jump.

Coca-Cola was originally green because of fresh cocoa leaves.

Honey is the only food that doesn’t spoil

Strawberry is the only fruit with its seeds on the outside.

All other vegetables must be replanted every year except two perennial vegetables; Asparagus and rhubarb that can live to produce on their own for several growing seasons.

There are 366 dimples on a golf ball."

The time it took you to read the above 10 facts is the same amount of time for Gervon Dextor to move AFTER the snap.
Pick 64: Tyrique Stevenson, CB, Miami-Long, physical CB. 6' 200lbs. Played some safety at UGA before transferring to Miami. Would be an excellent Tampa-2 CB. Would allow Gordon to move inside where he belongs and round out the secondary nicely.

Pick 103: Ricky Stromberg, C, Arkansas-Strong, mean, nasty, athletic, run-blocking center. He could probably start year one, but with Whitehair we won't need him to. Can learn for a year before taking over in 2024.
The Bears do NOT want to rely on Whitehair at center. The Bears must take a center who can start, no could and no probably.

Whitehair's best position is backup guard and center. Who else on the team can do that? If Lucas Patrick could, Whitehair would be a trade or cut candidate.
Pick 133: Braeden Daniels, OG, Utah-Very experienced player with positional versatility. Has played both guard positions and LT so he has some athleticism to his game to be able to play outside--and excel as he was first team all-conference in 2022 as a LT.
Sounds like a Poles type of offensive lineman!
Pick 136: Tyjae Spears, RB, Tulane-Board favorite. Good athleticism. One-cut back that would fit very nicely in this zone blocking scheme.
Chances he goes much earlier. There are others who can fall and fit the outside zone scheme.

Chase Brown is just one example of a RB who would fit the outside zone, can block and can be available at 136.
Pick 148: Luke Schoonmaker, TE, Mich-6'5, 250 athletic TE. 9.66 RAs, ran a 4.63 40. Would be a nice compliment to Kmet.
I would prefer someone who is more than just a compliment, thank you very much.

Put in Zack Kuntz for his athleticism or Tucker Kraft for his all around game and you would get a bit more.

Don't be afraid of the small school TE just because the Bears got burnt with one a few years ago.
Pick 218: Nesta Jade Silvera, DT, ASU-This is an Eberflus guy. Plays hard every play, mean, nasty. 6'2, 315. Can play NT or 3T in this 4-3 defense. Could develop into a good backup DT.
Good late round pick.
Pick 258: Tavius Robinson, Edge, Ole Miss-Toolsy developmental DE. 6'6, 257, 4.66 40, 8.76 RAS score. Finished 2022 with the 2nd most forced fumbles with five and had seven sacks. Another player that could develop into a rotational guy with low-end starter upside.
Another good late round pick for the defense.
QB: Fields,/ PJ Walker/Peterman
RB: Foreman/Herbert/Spears
WR: Moore/ESB
WR: Claypool/Pettis
WR: Mooney/VJJ
TE: Kmet/Tonyan/Schoonmaker
LT: Jones
LG: Jenkins/Daniels
C: Whitehair/Patrick/Stromberg
RG: Davis/Leatherwood/Carter
RT: Wright/Borom

DE: Walker/Gipson/D. Robinson
DT: Billings/Silvera
DT: Jones/Dexter
DE: R. Green/Hall/T. Robinson
LB: Edwards/Sanborn
LB: Edmunds/Lewis
CB: Johnson/Jones
NB: Gordon
CB: Stevenson/Vildor
S: Bojack
S: Brisker
You certainly could have done much worse and possibly have done better. Not bad.
 

JoJoBoxer

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
12,401
Liked Posts:
7,603
I've gone back and forth on that too for the fact that he's a RT, but I've come to the conclusion you need two starting tackles in today's league. DCs move their best guys all over now. If your RT is weak, they'll abuse him.

Besides look at Wirfs in TB (13th pick) or Lane Johnson in Philly (4th overall). Do you think either franchise regrets using a high pick on them?

I think if Wright is identified to be a 10+ year starter then the pick is well worth it.
Can Wright play LT if Broderick Braxton is hurt or sick?

I'm such a goofball
 

RiDLer80

First time, long time.
Joined:
Feb 16, 2014
Posts:
4,107
Liked Posts:
3,733
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Miami Hurricanes
  2. Northern Illinois Huskies
I'm not as up to speed on a fewof your picks. Here's my take.

Why not trade#9 if PJJ is gone?
Also for RB, I like Duece Vaughn at that spot.
I also like Nathaniel TANK Dell especially as he falls in this draft.

Last, why a TE at all? Bears landed Tonyan and still have Kmet, Allen and Tonges.

I'm not gonna comment on your Dline pucks because I dont really know anything about them.

I like your Stromberg and Daniels picks.
I'd draft Wright over PJJ if he were available. Plug Wright in at RT and let Jones continue to develop at LT. In this scenario I wouldn't risk trading down and losing Wright. He, PJJ and Broderick Jones could all go top 15.

Re: RB, I'm not tied to any one player. In this scheme we should be able find RBs in the middle rounds.

I think WR will need to be addressed with Mooney and Claypool on the last year of their deals but it's a low need at this point.

Tonyan is on a 1-yr deal and he's 28. Knowing Poles he's not in the long term plans and TEs need time to develop. Schoonmaker will be needed going forward but you can't rely on rookie TEs. He should be TE2 in 2024.
 

JoJoBoxer

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
12,401
Liked Posts:
7,603
I believe he started at LT for one season at Tennessee.
He may be athletic enough to be a RT but would he be athletic enough on Fields' blind side and what would happen to the outside zone scheme if he were to move.

Too much of a risk at 9 and too much to pay for a RT with the #9 pick.

For the Bears, he is more of an I-traded-down-and-now-I-want-fill-the-RT-spot-with-a-good-RT. Think pick 15 or later and getting some draft picks in return.
 

Enasic

Who are the brain police?
Joined:
Mar 17, 2014
Posts:
14,236
Liked Posts:
10,041
Yeah and his big claim to fame is dominating Will Anderson when he went up against him.
That’s a good claim to fame to have but that isn’t his only claim to fame. He’s super athletic and was one of the best pass protectors in college football. I think people get too caught up LT/RT distinctions when picking high. If Wright can be a pro bowl RT and the Bears solidify their OT spots for the next 10 years, it’s a great pick.
 

clenbuterol_clint

Formerly ClintK55
Joined:
Jan 14, 2015
Posts:
2,081
Liked Posts:
2,701
Did you hear about how the band Nirvana ended? This mock will wind up eerily similar
 

Les Grossman

Well-known member
Joined:
Jun 22, 2011
Posts:
15,009
Liked Posts:
13,732
He may be athletic enough to be a RT but would he be athletic enough on Fields' blind side and what would happen to the outside zone scheme if he were to move.

Too much of a risk at 9 and too much to pay for a RT with the #9 pick.

For the Bears, he is more of an I-traded-down-and-now-I-want-fill-the-RT-spot-with-a-good-RT. Think pick 15 or later and getting some draft picks in return.
It’s not too much to pay for a RT actually. Not sure where this fallacy came from.
 

The Big Grabowski

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2010
Posts:
1,804
Liked Posts:
2,260
Location:
Austin
Didn’t he break out at RT this year after not playing so well at LT the previous years?
Yeah, that's why the media largely views him as right, but I've heard some draft analysts say they wouldn't rule out LT.

Wright tested better than expected and it made a lot of people circle back on tape. A lot of his hype is built on the Alabama game and what he did vs Will Anderson, but he was literally built to stop speed to power guys like that (this draft is loaded with them). I think he went up against Will McDonald at the Senior Bowl which is a more telling matchup. IIRC they both took it to each other.
 

JoJoBoxer

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
12,401
Liked Posts:
7,603
It’s not too much to pay for a RT actually. Not sure where this fallacy came from.
No, it is.

Purely RTs, meaning not being able to be moved to LT, can be found in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th rounds.

What people fail to see is that taking a RT at 9 takes away the chance of getting a much more valuable piece at #9.

Let's look at this little example:
  1. The Bears take Carter at #9 and Bergeron at #53.
    1. the engine of the defense is addressed with the top 3 tech in the draft
    2. the RT position is addressed with a really good RT who probably fits the outside zone scheme better than Wright.
      1. Yes, he may be over his head if he has to move to LT because of injury, the same as Wright.
  2. The Bears take Wright at #9 and lose out on the 2nd tier 3 techs and probably end up drafting one of the lighter edge defenders at #53.
    1. Wright is a good RT but he is a bit of a round peg which doesn't quite fit the square hole.
    2. Wright is even worse as a fit for LT duties if it is required due to injuries.
    3. the engine of the defense is basically addressed with a body which has limited chance of being better than the 3 techs on the team from last year.
    4. Adding an edge is nice, but probably won't be effective due to the weakest part of the defense, the engine.
  3. The Bears trade down to mid first and pick up an early 2nd rounder.
    1. The Bears draft an OT:
      1. Jones, Paris, Harrison, Skoronski or Wright (in that order) if one falls.
    2. The Bears get one of the 2nd tier 3 techs early 2nd (White, Ade Ade, Kancey or Tiupulotu)
    3. The Bears get edge, C and CB with the two other 2nd rounders and the third.
Notice how using draft picks wisely, the Bears can draft good players who fit the scheme (with a bit of luck) and who fill most of their most pressing needs. Drafting Wright at #9 is not the wisest thing to do.
 

JoJoBoxer

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 14, 2010
Posts:
12,401
Liked Posts:
7,603
Yeah, that's why the media largely views him as right, but I've heard some draft analysts say they wouldn't rule out LT.

Wright tested better than expected and it made a lot of people circle back on tape. A lot of his hype is built on the Alabama game and what he did vs Will Anderson, but he was literally built to stop speed to power guys like that (this draft is loaded with them). I think he went up against Will McDonald at the Senior Bowl which is a more telling matchup. IIRC they both took it to each other.
Is it possible that Will Anderson is going to be a bit of a letdown, seeing that there will be better offensive tackles in the NFL who will be able to neutralize him just like Wright did?
 

The Big Grabowski

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2010
Posts:
1,804
Liked Posts:
2,260
Location:
Austin
Is it possible that Will Anderson is going to be a bit of a letdown, seeing that there will be better offensive tackles in the NFL who will be able to neutralize him just like Wright did?
It's an interesting question. I think most analysts have been comfortable with his floor as a quality starter. He's solid against the run and, of course, has elite pass rush production, but most acknowledge he isn't an elite athlete. So how does that translate?

He is supposed to be a high character guy with extraordinary intangibles, so it might be a Jalen Hurts situation where work ethic prevails at the NFL level.
 

Top