- Joined:
- Sep 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 41,927
- Liked Posts:
- 15,379
You ruined it, man!Corrected for accuracy
You ruined it, man!Corrected for accuracy
What would be your CoC (Code of Conduct)?
I'll start with my own.
1) Anything goes except for
2) Hall monitors or
3) Drunk authoritarians
4) AnarchoTotalitarianism
Please share your thoughts.
And cruelly confine them all in a village/fishbowl?I'd ban everyone
You done figured it out.
When I was just nine years old, my parents were killed in an alley behind the movie theater we had just seen Hackers at. Shot down in cold blood by some sports related internet message board poster.
I vowed that one day I would post on every sports related internet message board until they made me a moderator just to turn all of your E-lives into E-Hell.
And cruelly confine them all in a village/fishbowl?
What do you mean "you people"?In retrospect...it was a pretty creative route to go. I was finally accepting that I had to leave you people behind when Rush starts trolling my Gmail account.
View attachment 1865
#never4get
What do you mean "you people"?
Fans of various Chicago-based professional sports teams.
You can put that card back into the deck now, New Mexican.
That might not be the worst thing ever...
This is probably more a technical issue than "mod driven".
But there needs to be some checks & balances in place.
For example, on the old board a poster could only give a positive (thumbs up etc.) to another poster only so many times b4 it requested that you "spread it around"......I can't remember the exact verbiage.
Anyway a similar rule should be in place for a poster giving another a "thumbs down".
WHY? bcuz it gets to a point where if one poster doesn't like another poster, then they can just give endless "thumbs down" regardless of whats posted.
I mean a poster can say ' I wanna send everybody send everybody gift cards' and get a thumbs down. Of course, I'm being facetious, but I think we get the point.
Also, if, for what ever reason somebody puts me on a "ignore" or vice versa, then both parties should be restricted from any contact until the initial "ignore" is removed.
In other words, if I'm on a "ignore", I shouldn't be able to still troll and give bad ratings the poster who put me on "ignore" .
I don't know how any of this could be instituted, but there needs to be some type of checks & balance system in place to protect and / or safe guard against continuous abuse of the " thumbs down" feature.
Holy chit u sound like a lil *****.This is probably more a technical issue than "mod driven".
But there needs to be some checks & balances in place.
For example, on the old board a poster could only give a positive (thumbs up etc.) to another poster only so many times b4 it requested that you "spread it around"......I can't remember the exact verbiage.
Anyway a similar rule should be in place for a poster giving another a "thumbs down".
WHY? bcuz it gets to a point where if one poster doesn't like another poster, then they can just give endless "thumbs down" regardless of whats posted.
I mean a poster can say ' I wanna send everybody send everybody gift cards' and get a thumbs down. Of course, I'm being facetious, but I think we get the point.
Also, if, for what ever reason somebody puts me on a "ignore" or vice versa, then both parties should be restricted from any contact until the initial "ignore" is removed.
In other words, if I'm on a "ignore", I shouldn't be able to still troll and give bad ratings the poster who put me on "ignore" .
I don't know how any of this could be instituted, but there needs to be some type of checks & balance system in place to protect and / or safe guard against continuous abuse of the " thumbs down" feature.
This is probably more a technical issue than "mod driven".
But there needs to be some checks & balances in place.
For example, on the old board a poster could only give a positive (thumbs up etc.) to another poster only so many times b4 it requested that you "spread it around"......I can't remember the exact verbiage.
Anyway a similar rule should be in place for a poster giving another a "thumbs down".
WHY? bcuz it gets to a point where if one poster doesn't like another poster, then they can just give endless "thumbs down" regardless of whats posted.
I mean a poster can say ' I wanna send everybody send everybody gift cards' and get a thumbs down. Of course, I'm being facetious, but I think we get the point.
Also, if, for what ever reason somebody puts me on a "ignore" or vice versa, then both parties should be restricted from any contact until the initial "ignore" is removed.
In other words, if I'm on a "ignore", I shouldn't be able to still troll and give bad ratings the poster who put me on "ignore" .
I don't know how any of this could be instituted, but there needs to be some type of checks & balance system in place to protect and / or safe guard against continuous abuse of the " thumbs down" feature.
@run and shoot , if I may, please note post #1, wherein I ask, what would be your Code of Conduct (CoC)? How would you articulate and enforce the rules of your own personal mod-dom? Also, what would be the impetus or seminal reason for your wanting to be a mod in the first place?