houheffna
Ignoring Idiots
- Joined:
- May 6, 2009
- Posts:
- 8,673
- Liked Posts:
- 2,711
Dude, haha, I've typed the same thing over and over and over again...
LeBron James does not have a very good post up game... Pippen did. Pippen was also a great post passer (high and low)... LeBron is not.
Obviously LeBron is the most dominant offensive player of the 2 because of his pure passing, athleticism, and finishing ability. I would never argue otherwise.
I guess I keep asking because I am trying to find validity in the statement that if Jordan and Lebron had been together in their primes in the 1990's...
With Lebron as the dominant defensive player, the Cavs had some of the better defensive teams of the decade. Lebron has also been an all league defender. I don't see how that changes with Lebron hypothetically replacing Pippen...Lebron is bigger, stronger, faster than Pippen, I don't think he would have had a hard time being a dominant defensive player.
As far as posting up, the Bulls would win with no post presence in the early 1990's. But is Lebron incapable of getting the ball to the post? No...he is very good at it. So I don't understand the issue there.
Saying that Pippen is better than Lebron in certain areas does not disqualify Lebron from being dominant in that scenario...
The argument can be made that the Bulls could have won more with Lebron, he dominated the league from day one, it took Pippen 3 or 4 years to round into form. Lebron was a killer at 18, imagine what he would have done at 20, 21 after some college! If at 22 year old Lebron comes out in 1987, the Bulls might have won it that year or at least the next. THAT Bulls team might have won 2 or 3 before the actual Bulls would have won 1 title.