- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,922
- Liked Posts:
- 2,701
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
Hawks are in!
- Status
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 26,017
- Liked Posts:
- 3,297
- Location:
- Minnesota
My favorite teams
5-3 Minnesota! We're in now!
- Joined:
- Oct 8, 2010
- Posts:
- 3,194
- Liked Posts:
- 1,463
Yes!!!!!!!!!
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,922
- Liked Posts:
- 2,701
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
Thank you Minny!
- Joined:
- Apr 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 19,670
- Liked Posts:
- 6,438
- Location:
- Chicago
Thank you Wild.
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,922
- Liked Posts:
- 2,701
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
Playoffs are a whole new animal!
Let's treat it like a new season and make a run!
Let's treat it like a new season and make a run!
- Joined:
- Oct 8, 2010
- Posts:
- 3,194
- Liked Posts:
- 1,463
This is fantastic.
So happy.
So happy.
ClydeLee
New member
- Joined:
- Jun 29, 2010
- Posts:
- 14,829
- Liked Posts:
- 4,113
- Location:
- The OP
Time for the 3peat
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2010
- Posts:
- 768
- Liked Posts:
- 128
- Location:
- Los Angeles / OC area
I am stunned!! We made it!!! Here we come Vancouver. Minnesota, I love you!!!
- Joined:
- Apr 17, 2010
- Posts:
- 19,670
- Liked Posts:
- 6,438
- Location:
- Chicago
t-bo should start the new playoffs thread.
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,922
- Liked Posts:
- 2,701
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
I am working on it right now
- Joined:
- Mar 27, 2011
- Posts:
- 5,224
- Liked Posts:
- 1,865
Hopefully it has nothing to do with Stalberg 
- Joined:
- Jan 7, 2011
- Posts:
- 4,302
- Liked Posts:
- 1,402
- Location:
- Bandwagon
- Joined:
- Mar 27, 2011
- Posts:
- 5,224
- Liked Posts:
- 1,865
That's like claiming Teahan is the hidden advantage the White Sox have over everyone else. :doorrofl:
- Joined:
- Jan 7, 2011
- Posts:
- 4,302
- Liked Posts:
- 1,402
- Location:
- Bandwagon
Jokes on you, I don't follow the White Sox so I have no idea who you're referring to.
J
- Joined:
- Jan 7, 2011
- Posts:
- 4,302
- Liked Posts:
- 1,402
- Location:
- Bandwagon
Indeed, hopefully Lord Stanley's stay in Sweet Home Chicago is going to be an extended one.
J
- Joined:
- May 24, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,905
- Liked Posts:
- 1,974
So just how goddamn good does it feel to be Miettenen.
- Joined:
- Oct 8, 2010
- Posts:
- 3,194
- Liked Posts:
- 1,463
Hope he's in a hot tub somewhere with a pair of Finnish models right now.
He's earned it :buttrock:
- Joined:
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts:
- 15,922
- Liked Posts:
- 2,701
- Location:
- Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
snubs his old team...perfect!
- Joined:
- Mar 27, 2011
- Posts:
- 5,224
- Liked Posts:
- 1,865
Originally Posted by Everyday I'm Byfuglien
Perry is great. Bobby Ryan and Claude Girioux are very very good. Good names. That's 3 guys.
Iginla? 7 Mil, 33 years old? Coin toss with neither side being wrong. He brings a lot to the game that Kane doesn't have, but he's older and not as talented a playmaker.
- Completely wrong. He is a much better goal scorer, which is what the Hawks need and is a leader. Kane is too busy drinking and diddling girls to know what a leader is.
St Louis and Selanne? Great players, but a 35 and a 40 year old? Does the concept of Kane being 22 not make sense to you? Would you trade Keith for Lidstrom today? Wait, don't answer that.
- Keith has nothing to do with this and actually I might do that. Keith's game has taken a TREMENDOUS drop, but that is a completely different argument. St. Louis is 10X the playmaker that Kane is. I'll give you Selanne as almost done... but he still had a better year than Kane this year. Kane, a playoff stud, as you admitted, can't outdo an old Selanne? Very impressive year!
Grabner...a rookie. Kane had 72 points as a rookie. I understand that you're in love with goal totals, but come on.
- Grabner is on one of the worst teams in the league. You want young talent, here is it. Grabner is a better scorer then Kane. Sorry if that hurts your feelings.
So you named 3 rock solid choices, 1 coin flip/more expensive older guy, 2 geezers and a rookie. I'm giving you a strong 4 right answers.
- Your count is a little off, based off your jaded opinion. And I just spent 10 minutes looking up people. I am sure I can come up with another 10+ people who have a ridiculously low contract compared to Kane and putting up similar numbers.
That's 4 wingers that could be said are better (all things considered... skill, age, salary etc) than Patrick Kane.
4
Yeah, let's keep bitching about a top 5, 22 year old Stanley Cup winner
- You mean, let's complain about an overpaid winger who has shown very below average forechecking skills. With that in mind, he should be an elite goal scorer, which he isn't. He tries to be this "playmaker," which you keep naming him, waaaay too often and doesn't succeed. And yes, he is young so there is plenty of room for improvement. Unfortunately, this kid likes to chase skirts and get drunk, during the season as well as the offseason, instead of improve his physical stature and his game.
Is Kane good? Sure. Is he worth his contract, no way in hell.
Still waiting.
Perry is great. Bobby Ryan and Claude Girioux are very very good. Good names. That's 3 guys.
Iginla? 7 Mil, 33 years old? Coin toss with neither side being wrong. He brings a lot to the game that Kane doesn't have, but he's older and not as talented a playmaker.
- Completely wrong. He is a much better goal scorer, which is what the Hawks need and is a leader. Kane is too busy drinking and diddling girls to know what a leader is.
St Louis and Selanne? Great players, but a 35 and a 40 year old? Does the concept of Kane being 22 not make sense to you? Would you trade Keith for Lidstrom today? Wait, don't answer that.
- Keith has nothing to do with this and actually I might do that. Keith's game has taken a TREMENDOUS drop, but that is a completely different argument. St. Louis is 10X the playmaker that Kane is. I'll give you Selanne as almost done... but he still had a better year than Kane this year. Kane, a playoff stud, as you admitted, can't outdo an old Selanne? Very impressive year!
Grabner...a rookie. Kane had 72 points as a rookie. I understand that you're in love with goal totals, but come on.
- Grabner is on one of the worst teams in the league. You want young talent, here is it. Grabner is a better scorer then Kane. Sorry if that hurts your feelings.
So you named 3 rock solid choices, 1 coin flip/more expensive older guy, 2 geezers and a rookie. I'm giving you a strong 4 right answers.
- Your count is a little off, based off your jaded opinion. And I just spent 10 minutes looking up people. I am sure I can come up with another 10+ people who have a ridiculously low contract compared to Kane and putting up similar numbers.
That's 4 wingers that could be said are better (all things considered... skill, age, salary etc) than Patrick Kane.
4
Yeah, let's keep bitching about a top 5, 22 year old Stanley Cup winner
- You mean, let's complain about an overpaid winger who has shown very below average forechecking skills. With that in mind, he should be an elite goal scorer, which he isn't. He tries to be this "playmaker," which you keep naming him, waaaay too often and doesn't succeed. And yes, he is young so there is plenty of room for improvement. Unfortunately, this kid likes to chase skirts and get drunk, during the season as well as the offseason, instead of improve his physical stature and his game.
Is Kane good? Sure. Is he worth his contract, no way in hell.
Still waiting.
- Status