- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 60,067
- Liked Posts:
- 53,128
College coaches get paid when they deserve it.
I'm pretty sure they get paid when they sign a contract and at least 100% of them sign contracts before they become coaches.
College coaches get paid when they deserve it.
I'm pretty sure they get paid when they sign a contract and at least 100% of them sign contracts before they become coaches.
Interesting how some of you will show patience with Lovie at Illinois but had little for Pace with the Bears.
Odd comparison. Only 32 teams in NFL, if you suck you guaranteed a top draft pick and salary cap has every on even playing field. So the NFL model is built for bad teams to get better hence the parity.
By contrast, in college you competing against hundreds of schools, shitty teams don't get first crack at best players, and high profile programs have a massive recruiting advantage.
So it would be like the Pats having the top draft pick every year. Hence why Alabama wins and then gets the best recruits every year.
Or maybe it's just easier being patient when it's not your team?
And plenty of teams turn it around fast in college football.
(turn it around doesn't mean compete with Alabama either)
Well of course it is easier to be patient when it is something you don't care about. Doesn't change the fact the situation is completely different and not comparable at all.
If there are college teams that turn it around fast then compare Lovie to those teams. Comparing him to Pace though makes no sense.
Illinois couldn't have done better than hiring Lovie Smith. No one better wanted the job. The Bears could have done better than hiring Ryan Pace. Compare Lovie's credentials to Pace's credentials. Let me know when the offer Lovie an extension after 3 years of finishing in last place.
I'm waiting...
For what? Do you really require an explanation as to why turning around a college program is different to managing an NFL team? Most of the answer is already in this thread.
So basically you're saying a college team should take 5-6 years to turn around but an NFL team should take what? 2-3 years?
Who was available at that time that wanted the Bears job?
So basically you're saying a college team should take 5-6 years to turn around
Chris Ballard, Chiefs director of player personnel
Morocco Brown, Browns vice president of player personnel
Eric DeCosta, Ravens assistant general manager
Brian Gaine, Texans director of pro personnel
Tom Gamble, Eagles vice president of player personnel
Scot McCloughan, consultant
George Paton, Vikings assistant general manager
Duke Tobin, Bengals director of player personnel
Lionel Vital, Falcons director of player personnel
Eliot Wolf, Packers director of pro personnel
Brian Xanders, Lions senior personnel executive
WHAT? So you think that Power 5 conference standings basically get turned upside down every 5-6 years? 5 years from now we'll have Kansas winning the Big12 and Indiana will be playing Illinois in the Big10 title game while Ohio State and Oklahoma are going 2-10?
For reasons already given, a struggling, lower profile NCAA program is a much bigger and more cumbersome ship to turn around than an NFL franchise, yes. Much more so. Lovie has to get his program to a place where he can begin to persuade prospects and agents that his program is a good place to come to before he can land even good, far less great prospects. He doesn't get to just sign the best defensive player in the country with the stroke of a pen.