Eh? Who said that?
I said despite having HOF Qbs starting for the last two decades (in other words, despite being completely set at the position), GB has continued to draft QBs because they're important to have, whether for injury replacement or as value in trades. The Bears haven't had a QB worth a shit in decades yet don't bother to draft. As I mentioned earlier, they haven't drafted a QB higher than the 5th round since the Grossman/Orton days. When the most important position on the field is a continued position of need for your team, that's absurd.
Again, who said all of them are? Are you trying to break the CCS record for responding to things nobody said in one post?
Some of them are. You certainly aren't going to get a good one by not bothering.
So what you are saying is lets just keep drafting a QB until we find a hall famer like the Packers keep doing and lets stop drafting below the fourth round because it isn't working? I see
Bart Starr- drafted in the 17th round of the nfl draft
Brett Favre-Not even drafted by he Packers (very nice guy by the way)
Aaron Rodgers- The only packers hall of fame QB drafted higher than the fifth round or drafted by the Pack at all.
Maybe just maybe it doesn't matter what round you draft a QB in, a good QB is a good QB? But hey as long as we draft before the fifth round or just keep drafting them we will eventually get a QB who is better than Cutler (which according to you is everyone and shouldn't be too hard and yet we still haven't been able to do it despite your garbage fifth round argument)
I get that we need to keep looking ad I am for that obviously but again your statement on anyone will do or it will be easy to replace Cutler because anyone is better is false and using the Packers as an example isn't good either